A Strict-Contiguity Criterion for Preventing County Splits in Redistricting

IF 4.3 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Eric Rosenberg, Brendan Ruskey
{"title":"A Strict-Contiguity Criterion for Preventing County Splits in Redistricting","authors":"Eric Rosenberg,&nbsp;Brendan Ruskey","doi":"10.1111/gean.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The splitting of political subdivisions (in particular, counties) is a contentious aspect of the redistricting process. Though sometimes necessary, county-splitting districts are generally thought to be undesirable, and are typically prohibited by legislation unless required, e.g., to achieve equality of district populations. Some county-splitting districts are clear examples of gerrymandering, taking awkward non-compact shapes and stretching across several counties. However, even reasonably compact districts can exhibit county splits, and we provide five examples of reasonably compact districts exhibiting county splits. Thus there is a need for a criterion, unrelated to compactness, for evaluating whether a county-splitting district should be allowed. To disallow splits, we introduce a <i>strict contiguity</i> constraint specifying that a county can be used on a path between two precincts in a district only if the fraction of the county population assigned to the district exceeds a user-specified parameter <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ρ</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\rho \\in \\left(0,1\\right] $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. We provide a mathematical formulation of redistricting with strict contiguity and illustrate its numerical solution. Our definition of strict continuity is not limited to county splits; it can apply to any grouping of geographical units, or in a redistricting setting other than within the U.S.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"445-462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The splitting of political subdivisions (in particular, counties) is a contentious aspect of the redistricting process. Though sometimes necessary, county-splitting districts are generally thought to be undesirable, and are typically prohibited by legislation unless required, e.g., to achieve equality of district populations. Some county-splitting districts are clear examples of gerrymandering, taking awkward non-compact shapes and stretching across several counties. However, even reasonably compact districts can exhibit county splits, and we provide five examples of reasonably compact districts exhibiting county splits. Thus there is a need for a criterion, unrelated to compactness, for evaluating whether a county-splitting district should be allowed. To disallow splits, we introduce a strict contiguity constraint specifying that a county can be used on a path between two precincts in a district only if the fraction of the county population assigned to the district exceeds a user-specified parameter ρ ( 0 , 1 ] $$ \rho \in \left(0,1\right] $$ . We provide a mathematical formulation of redistricting with strict contiguity and illustrate its numerical solution. Our definition of strict continuity is not limited to county splits; it can apply to any grouping of geographical units, or in a redistricting setting other than within the U.S.

防止选区划分中县分裂的严格邻接标准
政治分区(特别是县)的分裂是重新划分选区过程中一个有争议的方面。虽然有时是必要的,但分裂县的地区通常被认为是不可取的,并且通常被立法禁止,除非有必要,例如,实现地区人口的平等。一些分裂县的选区是不公正划分选区的明显例子,它们采用了尴尬的不紧凑的形状,并延伸到几个县。然而,即使是相当紧凑的地区也会出现县分裂,我们提供了五个合理紧凑的地区出现县分裂的例子。因此,有必要制定一个与紧凑性无关的标准来评估是否应该允许分县的地区。为了禁止分裂,我们引入了一个严格的邻近约束,指定只有当分配给该地区的县人口的比例超过用户指定的参数ρ∈(0,1]$$ \rho \in \left(0,1\right] $$时,才能在一个地区的两个区域之间的路径上使用该县。给出了严格邻接重划的数学公式,并举例说明了其数值解。我们对严格连续性的定义并不局限于国家分裂;它可以适用于任何地理单位分组,或在美国以外的重新划分设置
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信