Comparisons Between Robbery and Break-And-Enter: Area-Specific Trends, Socioeconomic Risk Factors, and Hotspots Analysis Using a Bayesian Spatial and Spatiotemporal Approach

IF 4.3 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Jane Law, Abu Yousuf Md Abdullah
{"title":"Comparisons Between Robbery and Break-And-Enter: Area-Specific Trends, Socioeconomic Risk Factors, and Hotspots Analysis Using a Bayesian Spatial and Spatiotemporal Approach","authors":"Jane Law,&nbsp;Abu Yousuf Md Abdullah","doi":"10.1111/gean.12421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Robbery and break-and-enter (BE) crimes require investigations into how these contrasting crimes co-occur. Utilizing robbery and BE data from the City of Toronto in Canada, this study analyzed the mean and area-specific crime trends, their risk factors, and the shared and crime-specific risk and hotspot areas. Results suggest an increase in robbery (0.23, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.17–0.29) and BE (0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.12) crimes during 2021–2022, revealing the most prominent area-specific trends in northwest and northeastern Toronto. The findings suggest that spatially lagged variables can offer deeper insights into complex spatial interactions of real-life factors that influence crime. Robberies were positively associated with the household and dwellings indicator (2021 Ontario Marginalization Index) but not its spatial lag, while BE crimes had no direct association with it but showed a positive association with its spatial lag. Neighborhoods in northwestern, northeastern, and southcentral parts of Toronto were hotspots of robberies, while southcentral and northwestern parts were at elevated risk due to BE. The findings demonstrate the complexities associated with the co-occurrence of multiple crime types and highlight the need for more unified and integrated theories to contextualize neighborhood effects of crime determinants and their impact on crimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"463-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.12421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.12421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robbery and break-and-enter (BE) crimes require investigations into how these contrasting crimes co-occur. Utilizing robbery and BE data from the City of Toronto in Canada, this study analyzed the mean and area-specific crime trends, their risk factors, and the shared and crime-specific risk and hotspot areas. Results suggest an increase in robbery (0.23, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.17–0.29) and BE (0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.12) crimes during 2021–2022, revealing the most prominent area-specific trends in northwest and northeastern Toronto. The findings suggest that spatially lagged variables can offer deeper insights into complex spatial interactions of real-life factors that influence crime. Robberies were positively associated with the household and dwellings indicator (2021 Ontario Marginalization Index) but not its spatial lag, while BE crimes had no direct association with it but showed a positive association with its spatial lag. Neighborhoods in northwestern, northeastern, and southcentral parts of Toronto were hotspots of robberies, while southcentral and northwestern parts were at elevated risk due to BE. The findings demonstrate the complexities associated with the co-occurrence of multiple crime types and highlight the need for more unified and integrated theories to contextualize neighborhood effects of crime determinants and their impact on crimes.

Abstract Image

基于贝叶斯时空方法的抢劫与入室抢劫的区域趋势、社会经济风险因素及热点分析
抢劫和非法闯入犯罪需要调查这两种截然不同的犯罪是如何共同发生的。本研究利用加拿大多伦多市的抢劫和BE数据,分析了平均和特定区域的犯罪趋势,其危险因素,以及共同和特定犯罪风险和热点地区。结果表明,在2021-2022年期间,抢劫(0.23,95%可信区间(CI): 0.17-0.29)和BE (0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.12)犯罪增加,揭示了多伦多西北部和东北部最突出的区域特定趋势。研究结果表明,空间滞后变量可以更深入地了解影响犯罪的现实生活因素的复杂空间相互作用。抢劫与家庭和住宅指标(2021年安大略省边缘化指数)呈正相关,但与空间滞后无关,而BE犯罪与家庭和住宅指标无直接关联,但与空间滞后呈正相关。多伦多西北部、东北部和中南部地区是抢劫的热点地区,而中南部和西北部地区则因BE而处于高风险状态。研究结果显示了多种犯罪类型同时发生的复杂性,并强调需要更统一和综合的理论来分析犯罪决定因素的邻里效应及其对犯罪的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信