Long Term Survivors of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A Genomic Predictive Model.

Benjamin C Greenspun, Daniel Aryeh Metzger, Sally Lee, Bradley E Pearson, Jin H Li, Shuibing Chen, Rasa Zarnegar, Thomas J Fahey Iii, Brendan M Finnerty
{"title":"Long Term Survivors of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A Genomic Predictive Model.","authors":"Benjamin C Greenspun, Daniel Aryeh Metzger, Sally Lee, Bradley E Pearson, Jin H Li, Shuibing Chen, Rasa Zarnegar, Thomas J Fahey Iii, Brendan M Finnerty","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Longer-term survival is possible for some patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (ATC). However, genomic factors associated with improved survival are poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a mathematical model to predict mutation-based survival risk in ATC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 204 ATC samples from the cBioPortal database, divided into 80% training and 20% validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis identified prognostic genes, used to construct a point-based risk model. KEGG pathway enrichment and BRAF subanalyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional, international genomic database.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Samples were included if sequencing and survival data were available (N=204).</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The prespecified primary outcome was overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen genes were associated with increased risk - TET1, MAPK12, ATP10A, PIK3CA, MUC4, PNPLA2, PLD4, EGLN2, BSN, FLNC, RADIL, ZMYND8, FRAS1, RECQL4. More aggressive (n=37) and less aggressive cohorts (n=128) were determined using the maximally selected rank statistic, yielding a point threshold of 0.27. The predictive performance of the risk model demonstrated a C-index of 0.74. On Kaplan Meier analysis, 1-year survival differed for more aggressive patients (0%) compared to less aggressive patients (32%). For the validation cohort, survival remained significantly different between risk cohorts and on BRAF subanalysis. Each risk cohort subsequently underwent KEGG pathway enrichment analysis which showed significantly increased enrichment across several pathways for more aggressive tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model identifies mutated genes that are associated with the most aggressive ATCs and thus may aid in preoperative risk assessment when evaluating patients for surgery for curative intent.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Longer-term survival is possible for some patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (ATC). However, genomic factors associated with improved survival are poorly characterized.

Objective: To develop a mathematical model to predict mutation-based survival risk in ATC.

Design: Retrospective cohort study of 204 ATC samples from the cBioPortal database, divided into 80% training and 20% validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis identified prognostic genes, used to construct a point-based risk model. KEGG pathway enrichment and BRAF subanalyses were performed.

Setting: Multi-institutional, international genomic database.

Patients or other participants: Samples were included if sequencing and survival data were available (N=204).

Intervention(s): Not applicable.

Main outcome measure(s): The prespecified primary outcome was overall survival.

Results: Fourteen genes were associated with increased risk - TET1, MAPK12, ATP10A, PIK3CA, MUC4, PNPLA2, PLD4, EGLN2, BSN, FLNC, RADIL, ZMYND8, FRAS1, RECQL4. More aggressive (n=37) and less aggressive cohorts (n=128) were determined using the maximally selected rank statistic, yielding a point threshold of 0.27. The predictive performance of the risk model demonstrated a C-index of 0.74. On Kaplan Meier analysis, 1-year survival differed for more aggressive patients (0%) compared to less aggressive patients (32%). For the validation cohort, survival remained significantly different between risk cohorts and on BRAF subanalysis. Each risk cohort subsequently underwent KEGG pathway enrichment analysis which showed significantly increased enrichment across several pathways for more aggressive tumors.

Conclusions: This model identifies mutated genes that are associated with the most aggressive ATCs and thus may aid in preoperative risk assessment when evaluating patients for surgery for curative intent.

间变性甲状腺癌的长期幸存者:一个基因组预测模型。
背景:对于一些间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)患者来说,长期生存是可能的。然而,与提高生存率相关的基因组因素尚未被充分描述。目的:建立预测ATC患者突变生存风险的数学模型。设计:回顾性队列研究来自cbiopportal数据库的204例ATC样本,分为80%的训练组和20%的验证组。多变量分析确定了预后基因,用于构建基于点的风险模型。进行KEGG通路富集和BRAF亚群分析。环境:多机构、国际基因组数据库。患者或其他参与者:如果有测序和生存数据,则纳入样本(N=204)。干预措施:不适用。主要结局指标:预先设定的主要结局为总生存期。结果:TET1、MAPK12、ATP10A、PIK3CA、MUC4、PNPLA2、PLD4、EGLN2、BSN、FLNC、RADIL、ZMYND8、FRAS1、RECQL4等14个基因与风险增加相关。使用最大选择的rank统计来确定更具侵略性(n=37)和更弱侵略性的队列(n=128),产生0.27的点阈值。该风险模型的预测性能c指数为0.74。Kaplan Meier分析显示,攻击性较强的患者(0%)与攻击性较弱的患者(32%)的1年生存率存在差异。对于验证队列,风险队列和BRAF亚分析之间的生存率仍有显著差异。每个风险队列随后进行了KEGG通路富集分析,结果显示,在侵袭性更强的肿瘤中,多个通路的富集显著增加。结论:该模型确定了与最具侵袭性ATCs相关的突变基因,因此在评估患者手术治疗意图时可能有助于术前风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信