Local-regional therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and lenvatinib versus immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.

Shuofeng Li, Guanhua Yu, Mingming Wang, Shi Feng, An Zhang, Yu Wu, Zixiang Zhou, Shanshan Wang, Yihong Zhang, Mingjian Piao, Chengjie Li, Ziyu Xun, Boyu Sun, Jiongyuan Li, Nan Zhang, Hu Li, Yongliang Sun, Wen Zhang, Zhenyu Zhu, Haitao Zhao
{"title":"Local-regional therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and lenvatinib versus immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Shuofeng Li, Guanhua Yu, Mingming Wang, Shi Feng, An Zhang, Yu Wu, Zixiang Zhou, Shanshan Wang, Yihong Zhang, Mingjian Piao, Chengjie Li, Ziyu Xun, Boyu Sun, Jiongyuan Li, Nan Zhang, Hu Li, Yongliang Sun, Wen Zhang, Zhenyu Zhu, Haitao Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-04129-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains the first-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) but is limited by suboptimal efficacy. While local-regional therapy plus ICIs and lenvatinib (triple therapy) has demonstrated antitumor activity in biliary tract cancers, its role in ICC remains unclear. This multicenter study compared the effectiveness and tolerability of this triple therapy versus chemotherapy plus ICIs in advanced ICC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Advanced ICC patients receiving first-line local-regional therapy (radiotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or transarterial chemoembolization) plus ICIs and lenvatinib or chemotherapy plus ICIs were screened. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 patients receiving triple therapy and 70 patients receiving chemotherapy plus ICIs were included. The triple therapy group exhibited significantly prolonged median PFS (10.8 vs. 7.6 months, P = 0.011) and median OS (18.5 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.040), along with higher ORR (51.3% vs. 27.1%) and DCR (85.9% vs. 81.4%). Grade 3-4 AEs occurred more frequently in the triple therapy group (60.3% vs. 58.6%), this difference lacked statistical significance (P = 0.968). No grade 5 events were reported, and all AEs were manageable. Multivariate analysis identified CEA as an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local-regional therapy plus ICIs and lenvatinib demonstrated superior efficacy and manageable toxicity, establishing it as a viable first-line regimen for advanced ICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":"74 8","pages":"271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04129-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains the first-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) but is limited by suboptimal efficacy. While local-regional therapy plus ICIs and lenvatinib (triple therapy) has demonstrated antitumor activity in biliary tract cancers, its role in ICC remains unclear. This multicenter study compared the effectiveness and tolerability of this triple therapy versus chemotherapy plus ICIs in advanced ICC.

Methods: Advanced ICC patients receiving first-line local-regional therapy (radiotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or transarterial chemoembolization) plus ICIs and lenvatinib or chemotherapy plus ICIs were screened. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs).

Results: A total of 78 patients receiving triple therapy and 70 patients receiving chemotherapy plus ICIs were included. The triple therapy group exhibited significantly prolonged median PFS (10.8 vs. 7.6 months, P = 0.011) and median OS (18.5 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.040), along with higher ORR (51.3% vs. 27.1%) and DCR (85.9% vs. 81.4%). Grade 3-4 AEs occurred more frequently in the triple therapy group (60.3% vs. 58.6%), this difference lacked statistical significance (P = 0.968). No grade 5 events were reported, and all AEs were manageable. Multivariate analysis identified CEA as an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS.

Conclusion: Local-regional therapy plus ICIs and lenvatinib demonstrated superior efficacy and manageable toxicity, establishing it as a viable first-line regimen for advanced ICC.

局部联合免疫检查点抑制剂和lenvatinib与免疫检查点抑制剂加化疗治疗晚期肝内胆管癌:一项多中心队列研究
背景:化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)仍然是晚期肝内胆管癌(ICC)的一线治疗方法,但其疗效并不理想。虽然局部局部治疗加ICIs和lenvatinib(三联治疗)已显示出对胆道癌症的抗肿瘤活性,但其在ICC中的作用尚不清楚。这项多中心研究比较了三联疗法与化疗加ICIs治疗晚期ICC的有效性和耐受性。方法:筛选接受一线局部区域治疗(放疗、肝动脉输注化疗或经动脉化疗栓塞)加ICIs和lenvatinib或化疗加ICIs的晚期ICC患者。结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、不良事件(ae)。结果:共纳入三联治疗患者78例,化疗加ICIs患者70例。三联治疗组的中位PFS (10.8 vs. 7.6个月,P = 0.011)和中位OS (18.5 vs. 15.0个月,P = 0.040)均显著延长,ORR (51.3% vs. 27.1%)和DCR (85.9% vs. 81.4%)均较高。三联治疗组3-4级不良事件发生率更高(60.3%比58.6%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.968)。无5级事件报告,所有ae均可控制。多因素分析表明CEA是PFS和OS的独立预后因素。结论:局部区域联合ICIs和lenvatinib治疗显示出优越的疗效和可控的毒性,使其成为晚期ICC可行的一线治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信