Decision-Making Support for People Living With Dementia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Diverse Long-Term Care Settings in Japan.

IF 1.7
Ayane Komatsu, Tami Saito, Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Sanae Takanashi, Reiko Ishiyama, Kaoruko Aita, Hisayuki Miura
{"title":"Decision-Making Support for People Living With Dementia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Diverse Long-Term Care Settings in Japan.","authors":"Ayane Komatsu, Tami Saito, Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Sanae Takanashi, Reiko Ishiyama, Kaoruko Aita, Hisayuki Miura","doi":"10.1111/psyg.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of decision-making support for people living with dementia (PLWD) has been pointed out, but the actual situation has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to describe the implementation of decision-making support for PLWD in three long-term care settings in Japan: hospitals, facilities, and homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1000 randomly selected long-term care wards in hospitals (LTCHs), geriatric health service facilities (GHSFs), and home care nursing services (HNSs) between November 2022 and January 2023. Responses were collected using the 15-item decision-making support originally developed. In addition to calculating the implementation rate, the bivariate association between decision-making support implementation and facility characteristics was examined for items with low implementation rates. All analyses were conducted based on the facility type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study received 97 (9.7%), 164 (16.4%), and 215 (21.5%) valid responses from LTCHs, GHSFs, and HNSs, respectively. Across all care settings, 'confirm key family's wishes' was the most implemented aspect. In contrast, over half of the facilities did not implement 'support conducting a life review' and 'support expression and execution of wishes' in LTCHs and GHSFs. The implementation rate of these items was higher among facilities providing training on decision-making support and advanced care planning training for staff members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In all care settings, prioritizing family wishes occurred without assessing the decision-making capacity of PLWD. Training in decision-making support and advanced care planning showed potential for encouraging the implementation of decision-making support for PLWD. However, further investigation is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The importance of decision-making support for people living with dementia (PLWD) has been pointed out, but the actual situation has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to describe the implementation of decision-making support for PLWD in three long-term care settings in Japan: hospitals, facilities, and homes.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1000 randomly selected long-term care wards in hospitals (LTCHs), geriatric health service facilities (GHSFs), and home care nursing services (HNSs) between November 2022 and January 2023. Responses were collected using the 15-item decision-making support originally developed. In addition to calculating the implementation rate, the bivariate association between decision-making support implementation and facility characteristics was examined for items with low implementation rates. All analyses were conducted based on the facility type.

Results: The study received 97 (9.7%), 164 (16.4%), and 215 (21.5%) valid responses from LTCHs, GHSFs, and HNSs, respectively. Across all care settings, 'confirm key family's wishes' was the most implemented aspect. In contrast, over half of the facilities did not implement 'support conducting a life review' and 'support expression and execution of wishes' in LTCHs and GHSFs. The implementation rate of these items was higher among facilities providing training on decision-making support and advanced care planning training for staff members.

Conclusions: In all care settings, prioritizing family wishes occurred without assessing the decision-making capacity of PLWD. Training in decision-making support and advanced care planning showed potential for encouraging the implementation of decision-making support for PLWD. However, further investigation is necessary.

痴呆患者的决策支持:日本不同长期护理机构的全国性横断面研究
背景:虽然已经指出了痴呆患者决策支持的重要性,但实际情况并未得到充分的阐明。本研究旨在描述日本三种长期照护环境(医院、设施和家庭)对PLWD决策支持的实施情况。方法:于2022年11月至2023年1月,随机抽取1000家医院长期护理病房、老年卫生服务机构和家庭护理机构进行问卷调查。使用最初开发的15项决策支持收集反馈。除了计算执行率外,对于执行率较低的项目,还检查了决策支持执行与设施特征之间的双变量关联。所有的分析都是基于设施类型进行的。结果:ltch、ghsf和HNSs的有效回复分别为97(9.7%)、164(16.4%)和215(21.5%)。在所有护理设置中,“确认关键家庭的愿望”是执行得最多的方面。相比之下,超过一半的设施没有在ltch和ghsf中实施“支持进行生命回顾”和“支持表达和执行愿望”。在为工作人员提供决策支助培训和高级护理规划培训的设施中,这些项目的执行率较高。结论:在所有的护理环境中,优先考虑家庭意愿发生在没有评估PLWD决策能力的情况下。决策支持和高级护理规划方面的培训显示了鼓励对PLWD实施决策支持的潜力。然而,进一步的调查是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信