Miguel Ariza-Prota, Javier Pérez-Pallarés, Lucía García Alfonso, Lanza Martínez Angela, Héctor Torres-Rivas, Luis Fernández-Fernández, María de la Paz González Gutiérrez, Mario Berríos-Hernández, Marta García-Clemente, Francisco López-González
{"title":"Mediastinal restaging in non-small cell lung cancer: comparing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and mediastinal cryobiopsy following neoadjuvant therapy.","authors":"Miguel Ariza-Prota, Javier Pérez-Pallarés, Lucía García Alfonso, Lanza Martínez Angela, Héctor Torres-Rivas, Luis Fernández-Fernández, María de la Paz González Gutiérrez, Mario Berríos-Hernández, Marta García-Clemente, Francisco López-González","doi":"10.21037/med-25-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate mediastinal restaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment planning. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), the standard technique, has limitations such as low diagnostic yield and false negatives, often requiring invasive mediastinoscopy. This study evaluates the performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) as a potential alternative to EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal restaging following neoadjuvant therapy. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC, specifically focusing on diagnostic yield, false-negative rates, sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analyses, as well as the potential need for mediastinoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted on 22 NSCLC patients undergoing mediastinal restaging after neoadjuvant therapy from September 2023 to October 2024. Each patient underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC in the same procedure. Mediastinoscopy was performed only in cases where both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC results were negative or non-diagnostic, serving as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EBUS-TMC demonstrated superior diagnostic sensitivity (95.45% <i>vs.</i> 63.63%) and achieved sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analysis in 94.11% of cases compared to 29.41% for EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TMC identified six additional malignancy cases and had fewer non-diagnostic results (4.5% <i>vs.</i> 22.7%). No complications were reported for any procedure, and mediastinoscopy confirmed all negative EBUS-TMC cases as true negatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EBUS-TMC significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy for restaging NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy, reducing the need for mediastinoscopy. Its integration into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes, lower healthcare costs, and support personalized treatment strategies. This is the first study to demonstrate EBUS-TMC's transformative potential in thoracic oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74139,"journal":{"name":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","volume":"9 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/med-25-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Accurate mediastinal restaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment planning. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), the standard technique, has limitations such as low diagnostic yield and false negatives, often requiring invasive mediastinoscopy. This study evaluates the performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) as a potential alternative to EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal restaging following neoadjuvant therapy. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC, specifically focusing on diagnostic yield, false-negative rates, sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analyses, as well as the potential need for mediastinoscopy.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 22 NSCLC patients undergoing mediastinal restaging after neoadjuvant therapy from September 2023 to October 2024. Each patient underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC in the same procedure. Mediastinoscopy was performed only in cases where both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC results were negative or non-diagnostic, serving as the reference standard.
Results: EBUS-TMC demonstrated superior diagnostic sensitivity (95.45% vs. 63.63%) and achieved sample adequacy for molecular and immunohistochemical analysis in 94.11% of cases compared to 29.41% for EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TMC identified six additional malignancy cases and had fewer non-diagnostic results (4.5% vs. 22.7%). No complications were reported for any procedure, and mediastinoscopy confirmed all negative EBUS-TMC cases as true negatives.
Conclusions: EBUS-TMC significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy for restaging NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy, reducing the need for mediastinoscopy. Its integration into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes, lower healthcare costs, and support personalized treatment strategies. This is the first study to demonstrate EBUS-TMC's transformative potential in thoracic oncology.
背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在新辅助治疗后准确的纵隔重新定位对治疗计划至关重要。支气管超声引导下经支气管针抽吸(EBUS-TBNA)是标准技术,但存在诊断率低和假阴性等局限性,通常需要侵入性纵隔镜检查。本研究评估了超声引导下经支气管纵隔低温活检(EBUS-TMC)作为新辅助治疗后纵隔再定位EBUS-TBNA的潜在替代方案的性能。本研究比较了EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC的诊断准确性,特别关注诊断率、假阴性率、分子和免疫组织化学分析的样本充足性,以及对纵隔镜检查的潜在需求。方法:本前瞻性研究于2023年9月至2024年10月对22例接受新辅助治疗后纵隔再分期的NSCLC患者进行研究。每位患者在同一手术中同时接受EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC。仅在EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-TMC结果均为阴性或无法诊断的情况下进行纵隔镜检查,作为参考标准。结果:EBUS-TMC表现出更高的诊断灵敏度(95.45% vs. 63.63%), 94.11%的病例实现了分子和免疫组织化学分析的样本充分性,而EBUS-TBNA为29.41%。EBUS-TMC发现了6例额外的恶性病例,非诊断结果较少(4.5%对22.7%)。任何手术均无并发症报告,纵隔镜检查证实所有阴性EBUS-TMC病例为真阴性。结论:EBUS-TMC显著提高了新辅助治疗后NSCLC再分期的诊断准确性和样本充分性,减少了纵隔镜检查的需要。将其整合到临床实践中可以提高患者的治疗效果,降低医疗保健成本,并支持个性化治疗策略。这是首个证明EBUS-TMC在胸部肿瘤学领域具有变革潜力的研究。