{"title":"Introducing and evaluating a performance-based approach to coping flexibility: assessing repertoire breadth and situation-strategy fit.","authors":"Brianna Preiser, L E Bradley, Anthony Papa","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2529829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Cognitive Transactional Model of Coping suggests coping is maximized when individuals respond flexibly to situational demands. Directly testing the coping flexibility hypothesis is contingent on developing measures to capture the person-situation transactional process of coping. This study assessed the validity of a new performance-based approach to measuring coping flexibility and examined its contribution to predicting life satisfaction and psychological distress above existing measures.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>343 participants (52% male, 68% white) presented with two stressor scenarios were asked to describe how they would respond. Qualitative responses were coded to assess the breadth of individual coping repertoires and fit between the situation and strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurement approach effectively captured the varying demands of the stressor scenarios. Situation-strategy fit predicted increased life satisfaction and decreased psychological distress above existing coping flexibility measures. Contrary to prediction, the breadth of coping repertoires predicted decreased life satisfaction and increased psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study introduced a performance-based approach for coping flexibility and supported situation-strategy fit as an important component. A more sophisticated operationalization of repertoire is needed to delineate variability in coping responses that indicate flexibility from haphazard coping.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2529829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: The Cognitive Transactional Model of Coping suggests coping is maximized when individuals respond flexibly to situational demands. Directly testing the coping flexibility hypothesis is contingent on developing measures to capture the person-situation transactional process of coping. This study assessed the validity of a new performance-based approach to measuring coping flexibility and examined its contribution to predicting life satisfaction and psychological distress above existing measures.
Design and methods: 343 participants (52% male, 68% white) presented with two stressor scenarios were asked to describe how they would respond. Qualitative responses were coded to assess the breadth of individual coping repertoires and fit between the situation and strategy.
Results: The measurement approach effectively captured the varying demands of the stressor scenarios. Situation-strategy fit predicted increased life satisfaction and decreased psychological distress above existing coping flexibility measures. Contrary to prediction, the breadth of coping repertoires predicted decreased life satisfaction and increased psychological distress.
Conclusions: The current study introduced a performance-based approach for coping flexibility and supported situation-strategy fit as an important component. A more sophisticated operationalization of repertoire is needed to delineate variability in coping responses that indicate flexibility from haphazard coping.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.