Effectiveness of telehealth interventions for family caregivers of older adults with multiple diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mariana Ortiz-Piña, M Encarnación Martín-Franco, Pablo Molina-García, Rafael Prieto-Moreno, Marta Mora-Traverso, Trevor Russell, Patrocinio Ariza-Vega
{"title":"Effectiveness of telehealth interventions for family caregivers of older adults with multiple diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mariana Ortiz-Piña, M Encarnación Martín-Franco, Pablo Molina-García, Rafael Prieto-Moreno, Marta Mora-Traverso, Trevor Russell, Patrocinio Ariza-Vega","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251357054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTelehealth may offer a valuable resource for family caregivers' physical and psychological well-being; however, understanding its effectiveness is crucial to determining its true potential. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of telehealth interventions focused on family caregivers' physical and psychological well-being, along with other factors during the care of older adults with various diseases (such as neurocognitive disorders, chronic conditions, and musculoskeletal diseases).MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies that investigated the effects of telehealth on family caregivers of older adults with any disease and a comparison group receiving any type of intervention were selected. Two independent reviewers carried out the study selection and data extraction. We conducted a meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) to pool the continuous outcomes included. Heterogeneity (<i>I</i>² and Tau²), publication bias (Egger's test and funnel plots), risk of bias (Joanna Briggs Institute tool), potential mediators (meta-regressions), and robustness (leave-one-out method) were also assessed.ResultsTwenty-six studies were selected (23 randomized controlled trial and 3 quasi-experimental studies), including a total of 2932 family caregivers. Telehealth was more effective than usual care in improving psychological well-being (SMD = 0.21; <i>p</i> = 0.006), caregiving competence (SMD, 0.73; <i>p</i> = 0.007), and reducing caregiver burden (SMD = -0.26; <i>p</i> = 0.01) in a follow-up shorter than 4 months. It was not effective in reducing anxiety or depression (SMD = -0.18 and -0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.08 and 0.20, respectively), nor in improving physical fitness (SMD = -0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.460). Considering a follow-up period of 4-12 months, the only outcome in favor of telehealth was the improvement in managing patients' problematic behaviors (SMD = -1.27; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). It was not effective for psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, or caregiver burden (SMD = 0.15, 0.22, 0.08, and -0.33; <i>p</i> = 0.290, 0.260, 0.550, and 0.550, respectively).ConclusionTelehealth may be a valuable option for supporting family caregivers of older adults in improving psychological well-being, caregiving competence, and reducing burden, but the benefits may not last long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251357054"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251357054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTelehealth may offer a valuable resource for family caregivers' physical and psychological well-being; however, understanding its effectiveness is crucial to determining its true potential. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of telehealth interventions focused on family caregivers' physical and psychological well-being, along with other factors during the care of older adults with various diseases (such as neurocognitive disorders, chronic conditions, and musculoskeletal diseases).MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies that investigated the effects of telehealth on family caregivers of older adults with any disease and a comparison group receiving any type of intervention were selected. Two independent reviewers carried out the study selection and data extraction. We conducted a meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) to pool the continuous outcomes included. Heterogeneity (I² and Tau²), publication bias (Egger's test and funnel plots), risk of bias (Joanna Briggs Institute tool), potential mediators (meta-regressions), and robustness (leave-one-out method) were also assessed.ResultsTwenty-six studies were selected (23 randomized controlled trial and 3 quasi-experimental studies), including a total of 2932 family caregivers. Telehealth was more effective than usual care in improving psychological well-being (SMD = 0.21; p = 0.006), caregiving competence (SMD, 0.73; p = 0.007), and reducing caregiver burden (SMD = -0.26; p = 0.01) in a follow-up shorter than 4 months. It was not effective in reducing anxiety or depression (SMD = -0.18 and -0.40; p = 0.08 and 0.20, respectively), nor in improving physical fitness (SMD = -0.16; p = 0.460). Considering a follow-up period of 4-12 months, the only outcome in favor of telehealth was the improvement in managing patients' problematic behaviors (SMD = -1.27; p < 0.0001). It was not effective for psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, or caregiver burden (SMD = 0.15, 0.22, 0.08, and -0.33; p = 0.290, 0.260, 0.550, and 0.550, respectively).ConclusionTelehealth may be a valuable option for supporting family caregivers of older adults in improving psychological well-being, caregiving competence, and reducing burden, but the benefits may not last long term.

远程医疗干预对患有多种疾病的老年人家庭照顾者的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
远程医疗可以为家庭照顾者的身心健康提供宝贵的资源;然而,了解其有效性对于确定其真正潜力至关重要。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究远程医疗干预的有效性,重点关注家庭照顾者的身心健康,以及患有各种疾病(如神经认知障碍、慢性病和肌肉骨骼疾病)的老年人护理过程中的其他因素。方法检索spubmed、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library数据库。选择了调查远程保健对患有任何疾病的老年人的家庭照顾者的影响的研究和接受任何类型干预的对照组。两名独立的审稿人进行了研究选择和数据提取。我们使用标准化平均差异(SMDs)进行了荟萃分析,以汇总纳入的连续结果。异质性(I²和Tau²)、发表偏倚(Egger检验和漏斗图)、偏倚风险(Joanna Briggs研究所工具)、潜在的中介因素(meta回归)和稳健性(留一法)也进行了评估。结果共纳入26项研究,其中23项为随机对照研究,3项为准实验研究,共纳入2932名家庭照顾者。远程医疗在改善心理健康方面比常规护理更有效(SMD = 0.21;p = 0.006)、护理能力(SMD, 0.73;p = 0.007),减轻照顾者负担(SMD = -0.26;P = 0.01),随访时间短于4个月。在减少焦虑或抑郁方面没有效果(SMD = -0.18和-0.40;p分别= 0.08和0.20),在改善身体素质方面也没有作用(SMD = -0.16;p = 0.460)。考虑到4-12个月的随访期,唯一有利于远程医疗的结果是对患者问题行为管理的改善(SMD = -1.27;P = 0.290, 0.260, 0.550, 0.550)。结论远程医疗可能是支持老年人家庭照顾者改善心理健康、护理能力和减轻负担的一种有价值的选择,但其效果可能不会持续很长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信