Talking about sexual health in primary care: Results of a cross-sectional study among general practitioners in Germany.

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Josephine Solbach, Christine Kersting, Achim Mortsiefer
{"title":"Talking about sexual health in primary care: Results of a cross-sectional study among general practitioners in Germany.","authors":"Josephine Solbach, Christine Kersting, Achim Mortsiefer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical and psychological problems related to sexual health are a highly relevant health topic. Although general practitioners (GPs) are usually the first point of contact for patients, studies show that they rarely talk about sexual health. This study explored whether German GPs consider sexual health an important health issue and feel a responsibilty to address patient concerns in this regard, how often they discuss sexual health topics with their patients, and what hampers or facilitates conversations about sexual health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among German GPs (11/2021-06/2022). Data were analyzed in SPSS using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 249 participating GPs consider sexual health an important topic (68.8 %, n = 159) and feel responsible for their patients' sexual health (74.5 %, n = 176). Nearly one-half of respondents (48.1 %, n = 112) report that they address sexual issues less often than medically indicated. The main barriers include lack of time, language barriers, and the presence of relatives; the patients' own initiative and a good and/or long-term doctor-patient relationship have the effect of facilitating conversation. In-depth analysis revealed that the perception of hampering and supportive factors as well as the frequency with which sexual health topics are addressed is influenced by the following GP characteristics: higher age group, male gender, longer duration of practice, non-heterosexual orientation, specialization, and positive experiences with talking about this sensitive topic.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although sexual health is an important issue in primary care, it is discussed less often than medically indicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured communication and a high competence regarding sexual health issues can contribute to improving patient care and should therefore be more strongly represented in medical school curricula and GP training courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.06.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physical and psychological problems related to sexual health are a highly relevant health topic. Although general practitioners (GPs) are usually the first point of contact for patients, studies show that they rarely talk about sexual health. This study explored whether German GPs consider sexual health an important health issue and feel a responsibilty to address patient concerns in this regard, how often they discuss sexual health topics with their patients, and what hampers or facilitates conversations about sexual health.

Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among German GPs (11/2021-06/2022). Data were analyzed in SPSS using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

Results: Most of the 249 participating GPs consider sexual health an important topic (68.8 %, n = 159) and feel responsible for their patients' sexual health (74.5 %, n = 176). Nearly one-half of respondents (48.1 %, n = 112) report that they address sexual issues less often than medically indicated. The main barriers include lack of time, language barriers, and the presence of relatives; the patients' own initiative and a good and/or long-term doctor-patient relationship have the effect of facilitating conversation. In-depth analysis revealed that the perception of hampering and supportive factors as well as the frequency with which sexual health topics are addressed is influenced by the following GP characteristics: higher age group, male gender, longer duration of practice, non-heterosexual orientation, specialization, and positive experiences with talking about this sensitive topic.

Discussion: Although sexual health is an important issue in primary care, it is discussed less often than medically indicated.

Conclusion: Structured communication and a high competence regarding sexual health issues can contribute to improving patient care and should therefore be more strongly represented in medical school curricula and GP training courses.

谈论初级保健中的性健康:德国全科医生横断面研究的结果。
导读:与性健康相关的生理和心理问题是一个高度相关的健康话题。尽管全科医生通常是患者的第一个接触点,但研究表明他们很少谈论性健康。这项研究探讨了德国全科医生是否认为性健康是一个重要的健康问题,是否有责任解决患者在这方面的担忧,他们与患者讨论性健康话题的频率,以及是什么阻碍或促进了性健康的对话。方法:对德国全科医生(2021年11月- 2022年6月)进行定量、横断面在线调查。数据在SPSS中采用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归进行分析。结果:249名参与调查的全科医生中,大多数认为性健康是一个重要的话题(68.8% %,n = 159),并对患者的性健康感到负责(74.5 %,n = 176)。近一半的答复者(48.1 %,n = 112)报告说,他们处理性问题的频率低于医学指示。主要障碍包括缺乏时间、语言障碍和亲戚的存在;患者自身的主动性和良好或长期的医患关系具有促进对话的作用。深入分析表明,对阻碍和支持因素的看法以及讨论性健康主题的频率受到以下全科医生特征的影响:年龄较大、男性、执业时间较长、非异性恋取向、专业化以及谈论这一敏感话题的积极经验。讨论:尽管性健康在初级保健中是一个重要问题,但它的讨论频率低于医学指征。结论:关于性健康问题的结构化沟通和高能力有助于改善患者护理,因此应在医学院课程和全科医生培训课程中得到更多的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信