A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy of High Frequency Nasal Oxygenation with Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Postoperative Oxygenation in Patients Undergoing Exploratory Laparotomies.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Geetanjali T Chilkoti, Poonam Sehrawat, Medha Mohta, Michell Gulabani
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy of High Frequency Nasal Oxygenation with Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Postoperative Oxygenation in Patients Undergoing Exploratory Laparotomies.","authors":"Geetanjali T Chilkoti, Poonam Sehrawat, Medha Mohta, Michell Gulabani","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.251895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) is one of the leading causes of poor surgical outcome leading to longer hospital or intensive care unit stay and mortality especially with upper abdominal surgeries having long duration. High-frequency nasal oxygenation (HFNO) has recently been employed for postoperative oxygenation following extubation in surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consenting adult patients aged 18-65 years of either sex scheduled for exploratory abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia (GA) with Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score ≥ 26 i.e., moderate to high risk were enrolled. After instituting all routine the American Society of Anesthesiologists recommended monitoring, baseline haemodynamic parameters were recorded. Patients were preoxygenated with 100% oxygen and GA was administered as per standard institutional protocol. Following extubation, patients were randomly allocated into one of the groups comprising 25 patients each where Group C and Group H received conventional oxygen therapy via simple face mask and HFNO respectively. The FiO<sub>2</sub> was titrated (from 45% to 100%) by the anaesthesiologist to maintain a SpO<sub>2</sub> of 95% or more. Arterial blood samples were collected after extubation at various designated time points i.e. 2<sup>nd</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup>,12<sup>th</sup> and 24<sup>th</sup> hr, The P/F ratio, PaO<sub>2</sub>, PaCO<sub>2</sub>, S/F ratio along with haemodynamic parameters, incidence of PPCs/acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), atelectasis and comfort score were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvement in all oxygenation parameters following the use of HFNO for postoperative oxygenation; however, PaCO<sub>2</sub>, haemodynamic variables, complications, incidence of PPCs/AHRF and atelectasis remained comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preventive use of HFNO for post operative oxygenation amongst moderate to high-risk patients scheduled for exploratory abdominal surgery improves oxygenation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.251895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) is one of the leading causes of poor surgical outcome leading to longer hospital or intensive care unit stay and mortality especially with upper abdominal surgeries having long duration. High-frequency nasal oxygenation (HFNO) has recently been employed for postoperative oxygenation following extubation in surgical patients.

Methods: Fifty consenting adult patients aged 18-65 years of either sex scheduled for exploratory abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia (GA) with Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score ≥ 26 i.e., moderate to high risk were enrolled. After instituting all routine the American Society of Anesthesiologists recommended monitoring, baseline haemodynamic parameters were recorded. Patients were preoxygenated with 100% oxygen and GA was administered as per standard institutional protocol. Following extubation, patients were randomly allocated into one of the groups comprising 25 patients each where Group C and Group H received conventional oxygen therapy via simple face mask and HFNO respectively. The FiO2 was titrated (from 45% to 100%) by the anaesthesiologist to maintain a SpO2 of 95% or more. Arterial blood samples were collected after extubation at various designated time points i.e. 2nd, 6th,12th and 24th hr, The P/F ratio, PaO2, PaCO2, S/F ratio along with haemodynamic parameters, incidence of PPCs/acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), atelectasis and comfort score were also recorded.

Results: Significant improvement in all oxygenation parameters following the use of HFNO for postoperative oxygenation; however, PaCO2, haemodynamic variables, complications, incidence of PPCs/AHRF and atelectasis remained comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: Preventive use of HFNO for post operative oxygenation amongst moderate to high-risk patients scheduled for exploratory abdominal surgery improves oxygenation.

一项随机对照研究,比较高频鼻氧合与常规氧治疗对剖腹探查术后氧合的疗效。
目的:术后肺部并发症(PPC)是导致手术效果不佳的主要原因之一,导致住院或重症监护时间延长和死亡率增加,尤其是上腹部手术时间长。高频鼻氧合(HFNO)最近被用于外科患者拔管后的术后氧合。方法:纳入50例18-65岁的成人患者,年龄不分性别,均同意在全身麻醉(GA)下进行腹部探查手术,加泰罗尼亚手术患者呼吸风险评估评分≥26分,即中度至高风险。在制定了美国麻醉医师协会推荐的所有常规监测后,记录基线血流动力学参数。患者用100%氧气预充氧,并按照标准机构方案给予GA。拔管后,将患者随机分为两组,每组25例,其中C组和H组分别通过简单面罩和HFNO进行常规氧疗。麻醉医师滴定FiO2(从45%到100%)以保持SpO2≥95%。拔管后于第2、6、12、24小时采集动脉血,记录P/F、PaO2、PaCO2、S/F及血流动力学参数、PPCs/急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)发生率、肺不张及舒适评分。结果:采用HFNO进行术后氧合后,各氧合参数均有显著改善;然而,PaCO2、血流动力学变量、并发症、PPCs/AHRF发生率和肺不张在两组之间保持可比性。结论:腹探查手术中高危患者术后预防性使用高氧一氧化氮可改善术后氧合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信