Can femoral neck-shaft angle predict timing of contralateral second hip fracture? A 7-year retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral centre for trauma.

Q1 Medicine
Ezanul Harriz Abd Wahab, Colum Downey, Ben Murphy, Sophie Lawlor, Patrick O'kelly, Conor Shortt, John F Quinlan
{"title":"Can femoral neck-shaft angle predict timing of contralateral second hip fracture? A 7-year retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral centre for trauma.","authors":"Ezanul Harriz Abd Wahab, Colum Downey, Ben Murphy, Sophie Lawlor, Patrick O'kelly, Conor Shortt, John F Quinlan","doi":"10.1007/s12306-025-00908-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previously published literature from our institution found that patients with a fragility hip fracture were estimated to have a 4-10% risk of sustaining a second contralateral hip fracture. A follow-up, multi-centre study found that 1 in 11 (9.1%) patients sustained a contralateral hip fracture within three years of index hip fracture. Previous studies have examined the anatomic geometry of the hip joint as a risk factor for hip fractures. Our study aimed to establish a relationship between the neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the contralateral hip in patients who had already suffered a hip fragility fracture in terms of timing to second hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 7-year, single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients that presented with a second contralateral fragility hip fracture from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were all patients 60 years old and above who suffered a second contralateral hip fracture. Exclusion criteria were all patients who were aged less than 60 years old, high-energy injuries or those who suffered peri-prosthetic fractures. The NSA was calculated by measuring the intersection of the femoral neck axis and the femoral shaft axis of the hip. Age, gender, surgery type and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) score were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four patients were suitable for analysis. NSA ranged from 113 to 146.5 degrees with an average of 130.2 degrees. Female patients had an average NSA of 129.7 degrees compared to 131.3 degrees in male patients. Average time to second hip fracture was 3.5 years, ranging from 0.08 years (29 days) to 20 years (7326 days). There was a 2.3:1 ratio of female-to-male presentations. Patient age ranged from 60 to 100 years old. The largest age group included patients aged 80-89 years, with 38 patients (28 females and 10 males). Correlation analysis performed showed no statistical significance between NSA and timing of second contralateral hip fracture with a p value of 0.235. There was an association between fracture type, specifically intracapsular hip fractures, and time to second hip fracture, but this was not statistically significant (p value 0.052).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no statistically significant association between femoral NSA and time to second fragility hip fracture. As we have excluded NSA as an independent risk factor, further studies may now be carried out to look for other potential predictors of timing to second hip fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-025-00908-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previously published literature from our institution found that patients with a fragility hip fracture were estimated to have a 4-10% risk of sustaining a second contralateral hip fracture. A follow-up, multi-centre study found that 1 in 11 (9.1%) patients sustained a contralateral hip fracture within three years of index hip fracture. Previous studies have examined the anatomic geometry of the hip joint as a risk factor for hip fractures. Our study aimed to establish a relationship between the neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the contralateral hip in patients who had already suffered a hip fragility fracture in terms of timing to second hip fracture.

Methods: A 7-year, single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients that presented with a second contralateral fragility hip fracture from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were all patients 60 years old and above who suffered a second contralateral hip fracture. Exclusion criteria were all patients who were aged less than 60 years old, high-energy injuries or those who suffered peri-prosthetic fractures. The NSA was calculated by measuring the intersection of the femoral neck axis and the femoral shaft axis of the hip. Age, gender, surgery type and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) score were also examined.

Results: Ninety-four patients were suitable for analysis. NSA ranged from 113 to 146.5 degrees with an average of 130.2 degrees. Female patients had an average NSA of 129.7 degrees compared to 131.3 degrees in male patients. Average time to second hip fracture was 3.5 years, ranging from 0.08 years (29 days) to 20 years (7326 days). There was a 2.3:1 ratio of female-to-male presentations. Patient age ranged from 60 to 100 years old. The largest age group included patients aged 80-89 years, with 38 patients (28 females and 10 males). Correlation analysis performed showed no statistical significance between NSA and timing of second contralateral hip fracture with a p value of 0.235. There was an association between fracture type, specifically intracapsular hip fractures, and time to second hip fracture, but this was not statistically significant (p value 0.052).

Conclusion: There is no statistically significant association between femoral NSA and time to second fragility hip fracture. As we have excluded NSA as an independent risk factor, further studies may now be carried out to look for other potential predictors of timing to second hip fracture.

股骨颈轴角能否预测对侧第二次髋部骨折的时机?在创伤三级转诊中心进行的一项7年回顾性队列研究。
导读:我们机构先前发表的文献发现,脆性髋部骨折的患者估计有4-10%的风险再次发生对侧髋部骨折。一项多中心随访研究发现,每11名患者中就有1名(9.1%)在髋部骨折后3年内发生对侧髋部骨折。先前的研究已经检查了髋关节的解剖几何形状作为髋部骨折的危险因素。我们的研究旨在建立对侧髋关节颈轴角(NSA)与髋关节易碎性骨折患者发生第二次髋骨折时间的关系。方法:对2013年至2019年第二次对侧脆性髋部骨折患者进行为期7年的单机构回顾性队列研究。纳入标准是所有60岁及以上的第二次对侧髋部骨折患者。排除标准为年龄小于60岁、高能损伤或假体周围骨折的患者。通过测量股骨颈轴与髋关节股骨轴的交点计算NSA。年龄、性别、手术类型和美国麻醉医师协会身体状态分类(ASA)评分也被检查。结果:94例患者适合分析。NSA的范围从113度到146.5度,平均为130.2度。女性患者的平均NSA为129.7度,而男性患者为131.3度。至第二次髋部骨折的平均时间为3.5年,范围为0.08年(29天)至20年(7326天)。女性和男性的比例是2.3:1。患者年龄60 - 100岁。最大年龄组为80 ~ 89岁,38例(女性28例,男性10例)。经相关分析,NSA与对侧髋部第二次骨折时间的相关性无统计学意义,p值为0.235。骨折类型(尤其是髋囊内骨折)与发生第二次髋部骨折的时间相关,但无统计学意义(p值0.052)。结论:股骨NSA与发生第二次脆性髋骨折的时间无统计学意义。由于我们已经排除了NSA作为一个独立的危险因素,现在可以进行进一步的研究,以寻找其他潜在的预测第二次髋部骨折时间的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信