Identifying Opportunities for Fluid Balance Optimization in Critically Ill Children.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Denise C Hasson, Ami Shah, Chloe G Braun, Ulka Kothari, Steve Drury, Heda Dapul, Julie C Fitzgerald, Celeste Dixon, Andrew Barbera, James Odum, Nina Terry, Scott L Weiss, Susan D Martin, Adam C Dziorny
{"title":"Identifying Opportunities for Fluid Balance Optimization in Critically Ill Children.","authors":"Denise C Hasson, Ami Shah, Chloe G Braun, Ulka Kothari, Steve Drury, Heda Dapul, Julie C Fitzgerald, Celeste Dixon, Andrew Barbera, James Odum, Nina Terry, Scott L Weiss, Susan D Martin, Adam C Dziorny","doi":"10.1177/08850666251359543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionFluid overload (FO), a state of pathologic positive cumulative fluid balance (CFB), is common in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) and associated with morbidity and mortality. Because different PICUs may have unique needs, barriers, and limitations to accurately report fluid balance (FB) and reduce FO, understanding the drivers of positive FB is needed. We hypothesize CFB >5% and >10% is common on ICU days 1 and 2, but that reasons for high %CFB will vary across sites, as will barriers to accurate FB recording and opportunities to improve FB recording/management.MethodsConcurrent mixed methods study utilizing a retrospective observational cohort design and prospective interview and survey design performed at four tertiary pediatric ICUs. FB data were extracted from the electronic health record. A federated data collection framework allowed for rapid data aggregation. The primary outcome was %CFB on ICU days 1 and 2, defined as total intake minus total output divided by ICU admission weight. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared results across and within sites.ResultsAmongst 3,071 ICU encounters, day 2 CFB >5% varied from 39% to 54% (p = 0.03) and day 2 CFB >10% varied from 16% to 25% (p = 0.04) across sites. Urine occurrence recordings and patients receiving >100% Holliday-Segar fluids on Day 1 differed across sites (p < 0.001). Sites discussed overall FB and specific FB goals on rounds with differing frequency (42-73% and 19-39%, respectively), but they reported similar barriers to accurate FB reporting and achievable opportunities to improve FB measurements, including patients/families not saving urine/stool, patients not tracking oral intake, and lack of standardized charting of flushes.ConclusionDay 2 CFB >5% and >10% was common among pediatric ICU encounters but proportion of patients varied significantly across ICUs. Individual ICUs have different drivers of FO that must be targeted to improve FB management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251359543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251359543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionFluid overload (FO), a state of pathologic positive cumulative fluid balance (CFB), is common in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) and associated with morbidity and mortality. Because different PICUs may have unique needs, barriers, and limitations to accurately report fluid balance (FB) and reduce FO, understanding the drivers of positive FB is needed. We hypothesize CFB >5% and >10% is common on ICU days 1 and 2, but that reasons for high %CFB will vary across sites, as will barriers to accurate FB recording and opportunities to improve FB recording/management.MethodsConcurrent mixed methods study utilizing a retrospective observational cohort design and prospective interview and survey design performed at four tertiary pediatric ICUs. FB data were extracted from the electronic health record. A federated data collection framework allowed for rapid data aggregation. The primary outcome was %CFB on ICU days 1 and 2, defined as total intake minus total output divided by ICU admission weight. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared results across and within sites.ResultsAmongst 3,071 ICU encounters, day 2 CFB >5% varied from 39% to 54% (p = 0.03) and day 2 CFB >10% varied from 16% to 25% (p = 0.04) across sites. Urine occurrence recordings and patients receiving >100% Holliday-Segar fluids on Day 1 differed across sites (p < 0.001). Sites discussed overall FB and specific FB goals on rounds with differing frequency (42-73% and 19-39%, respectively), but they reported similar barriers to accurate FB reporting and achievable opportunities to improve FB measurements, including patients/families not saving urine/stool, patients not tracking oral intake, and lack of standardized charting of flushes.ConclusionDay 2 CFB >5% and >10% was common among pediatric ICU encounters but proportion of patients varied significantly across ICUs. Individual ICUs have different drivers of FO that must be targeted to improve FB management.

确定危重儿童液体平衡优化的机会。
体液超载(FO)是一种病理性累积体液平衡阳性(CFB)状态,在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)很常见,并与发病率和死亡率相关。由于不同的picu在准确报告液体平衡(FB)和降低FO方面可能有不同的需求、障碍和限制,因此需要了解FB阳性的驱动因素。我们假设在ICU第1天和第2天,CFB >5%和>0 %是常见的,但高CFB %的原因因地点而异,准确记录FB的障碍和改善FB记录/管理的机会也各不相同。方法采用回顾性观察队列设计、前瞻性访谈和调查设计的并行混合方法,在4个儿科三级icu进行研究。FB数据从电子健康记录中提取。联邦数据收集框架支持快速数据聚合。主要终点是ICU第1天和第2天的CFB %,定义为总摄入减去总输出除以ICU入院重量。卡方检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了站点间和站点内的结果。结果在3071例ICU就诊中,不同地点的第2天CFB >(5%)和第2天CFB >(10%)的差异分别为39% ~ 54% (p = 0.03)和16% ~ 25% (p = 0.04)。尿发生记录和患者在第1天接受>100% Holliday-Segar液体的情况在不同部位存在差异(在儿科ICU就诊中,>为5%,>为10%),但不同ICU的患者比例差异显著。个体icu有不同的FO驱动因素,必须有针对性地改善FB管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信