Denise C Hasson, Ami Shah, Chloe G Braun, Ulka Kothari, Steve Drury, Heda Dapul, Julie C Fitzgerald, Celeste Dixon, Andrew Barbera, James Odum, Nina Terry, Scott L Weiss, Susan D Martin, Adam C Dziorny
{"title":"Identifying Opportunities for Fluid Balance Optimization in Critically Ill Children.","authors":"Denise C Hasson, Ami Shah, Chloe G Braun, Ulka Kothari, Steve Drury, Heda Dapul, Julie C Fitzgerald, Celeste Dixon, Andrew Barbera, James Odum, Nina Terry, Scott L Weiss, Susan D Martin, Adam C Dziorny","doi":"10.1177/08850666251359543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionFluid overload (FO), a state of pathologic positive cumulative fluid balance (CFB), is common in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) and associated with morbidity and mortality. Because different PICUs may have unique needs, barriers, and limitations to accurately report fluid balance (FB) and reduce FO, understanding the drivers of positive FB is needed. We hypothesize CFB >5% and >10% is common on ICU days 1 and 2, but that reasons for high %CFB will vary across sites, as will barriers to accurate FB recording and opportunities to improve FB recording/management.MethodsConcurrent mixed methods study utilizing a retrospective observational cohort design and prospective interview and survey design performed at four tertiary pediatric ICUs. FB data were extracted from the electronic health record. A federated data collection framework allowed for rapid data aggregation. The primary outcome was %CFB on ICU days 1 and 2, defined as total intake minus total output divided by ICU admission weight. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared results across and within sites.ResultsAmongst 3,071 ICU encounters, day 2 CFB >5% varied from 39% to 54% (p = 0.03) and day 2 CFB >10% varied from 16% to 25% (p = 0.04) across sites. Urine occurrence recordings and patients receiving >100% Holliday-Segar fluids on Day 1 differed across sites (p < 0.001). Sites discussed overall FB and specific FB goals on rounds with differing frequency (42-73% and 19-39%, respectively), but they reported similar barriers to accurate FB reporting and achievable opportunities to improve FB measurements, including patients/families not saving urine/stool, patients not tracking oral intake, and lack of standardized charting of flushes.ConclusionDay 2 CFB >5% and >10% was common among pediatric ICU encounters but proportion of patients varied significantly across ICUs. Individual ICUs have different drivers of FO that must be targeted to improve FB management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251359543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251359543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionFluid overload (FO), a state of pathologic positive cumulative fluid balance (CFB), is common in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) and associated with morbidity and mortality. Because different PICUs may have unique needs, barriers, and limitations to accurately report fluid balance (FB) and reduce FO, understanding the drivers of positive FB is needed. We hypothesize CFB >5% and >10% is common on ICU days 1 and 2, but that reasons for high %CFB will vary across sites, as will barriers to accurate FB recording and opportunities to improve FB recording/management.MethodsConcurrent mixed methods study utilizing a retrospective observational cohort design and prospective interview and survey design performed at four tertiary pediatric ICUs. FB data were extracted from the electronic health record. A federated data collection framework allowed for rapid data aggregation. The primary outcome was %CFB on ICU days 1 and 2, defined as total intake minus total output divided by ICU admission weight. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared results across and within sites.ResultsAmongst 3,071 ICU encounters, day 2 CFB >5% varied from 39% to 54% (p = 0.03) and day 2 CFB >10% varied from 16% to 25% (p = 0.04) across sites. Urine occurrence recordings and patients receiving >100% Holliday-Segar fluids on Day 1 differed across sites (p < 0.001). Sites discussed overall FB and specific FB goals on rounds with differing frequency (42-73% and 19-39%, respectively), but they reported similar barriers to accurate FB reporting and achievable opportunities to improve FB measurements, including patients/families not saving urine/stool, patients not tracking oral intake, and lack of standardized charting of flushes.ConclusionDay 2 CFB >5% and >10% was common among pediatric ICU encounters but proportion of patients varied significantly across ICUs. Individual ICUs have different drivers of FO that must be targeted to improve FB management.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.