Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Time-To-Event Data.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro, Ana Luiza Rocha Soares Menegat, Brenda Luana Rocha Soares Menegat, Isabela Junger Meirelles Aguiar, Pedro Henrique de Souza Wagner, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Time-To-Event Data.","authors":"Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro, Ana Luiza Rocha Soares Menegat, Brenda Luana Rocha Soares Menegat, Isabela Junger Meirelles Aguiar, Pedro Henrique de Souza Wagner, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01271-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract, most commonly originating in the stomach or small intestine, and driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive technique to detect and monitor circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics and treatment response. Specifically, detecting KIT/PDGFRA mutations in ctDNA may aid in assessing prognosis, therapeutic response, and resistance. However, the clinical utility of this approach remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic relevance of ctDNA mutations in GIST patients by comparing survival outcomes between those with KIT/PDGFRA mutations and those with wild-type profiles or no detectable ctDNA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies evaluating overall survival (OS) at different time points in patients with GIST, stratified by ctDNA status (ctDNA-negative vs. ctDNA-positive). Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted or calculated, and Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software, version 4.2.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included seven eligible studies comprising a total of 2024 histologically confirmed GIST patients, of whom 1610 were classified as ctDNA-positive and 414 had no detectable ctDNA mutations. OS at different time points was consistently more favorable in the ctDNA-negative group compared to the ctDNA-positive group (reference). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) were as follows: at 1year, HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%); at 2years, HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 20%); at 3years, HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 28.2%); and at 5years, HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.73; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 70.8%). At maximum follow-up (mean follow-up of 7.5months), OS showed a 49% reduction in survival in the ctDNA-positive group (HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40-0.64; p < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 79.9%). Additionally, in a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier data from patients with the KIT exon 11 (KIT11) mutation, the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model estimated an HR of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007), favoring the ctDNA-positive group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the potential of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in GIST, showing that its presence is consistently associated with poorer survival outcomes across mutational subtypes. These findings support the integration of ctDNA analysis into clinical practice as a minimally invasive tool for disease monitoring, contributing to more personalized and precise management of GIST patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01271-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract, most commonly originating in the stomach or small intestine, and driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive technique to detect and monitor circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics and treatment response. Specifically, detecting KIT/PDGFRA mutations in ctDNA may aid in assessing prognosis, therapeutic response, and resistance. However, the clinical utility of this approach remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic relevance of ctDNA mutations in GIST patients by comparing survival outcomes between those with KIT/PDGFRA mutations and those with wild-type profiles or no detectable ctDNA.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies evaluating overall survival (OS) at different time points in patients with GIST, stratified by ctDNA status (ctDNA-negative vs. ctDNA-positive). Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted or calculated, and Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software, version 4.2.3.

Results: This study included seven eligible studies comprising a total of 2024 histologically confirmed GIST patients, of whom 1610 were classified as ctDNA-positive and 414 had no detectable ctDNA mutations. OS at different time points was consistently more favorable in the ctDNA-negative group compared to the ctDNA-positive group (reference). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) were as follows: at 1year, HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%); at 2years, HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88; p < 0.01; I2 = 20%); at 3years, HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81; p < 0.01; I2 = 28.2%); and at 5years, HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.73; p < 0.01; I2 = 70.8%). At maximum follow-up (mean follow-up of 7.5months), OS showed a 49% reduction in survival in the ctDNA-positive group (HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40-0.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 79.9%). Additionally, in a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier data from patients with the KIT exon 11 (KIT11) mutation, the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model estimated an HR of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007), favoring the ctDNA-positive group.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis highlights the potential of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in GIST, showing that its presence is consistently associated with poorer survival outcomes across mutational subtypes. These findings support the integration of ctDNA analysis into clinical practice as a minimally invasive tool for disease monitoring, contributing to more personalized and precise management of GIST patients.

胃肠道间质瘤循环肿瘤DNA突变的预后意义:基于事件时间数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:胃肠道间质瘤(胃肠道间质瘤)是一种罕见的消化道间质肿瘤,最常发源于胃或小肠,由KIT或PDGFRA基因激活突变驱动。液体活检已经成为一种很有前途的微创技术,用于检测和监测循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA),提供对肿瘤动态和治疗反应的实时洞察。具体来说,检测ctDNA中的KIT/PDGFRA突变可能有助于评估预后、治疗反应和耐药性。然而,这种方法的临床应用尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,通过比较KIT/PDGFRA突变与野生型或未检测到ctDNA的患者的生存结果,来评估GIST患者ctDNA突变与预后的相关性。方法:在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行全面的系统搜索,以确定根据ctDNA状态(ctDNA阴性与ctDNA阳性)对GIST患者不同时间点的总生存期(OS)进行评估的研究。提取或计算风险比(hr),并使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型重建Kaplan-Meier曲线,置信区间为95%。p值结果:本研究包括7项符合条件的研究,共包括2024例组织学证实的GIST患者,其中1610例为ctDNA阳性,414例未检测到ctDNA突变。与ctdna阳性组相比,ctdna阴性组不同时间点的OS始终更有利(参考文献)。合并风险比(HR)如下:1年时,HR为0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93;p 2 = 0%);2年时,HR为0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88;p 2 = 20%);3年时,HR为0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81;p 2 = 28.2%);5年时,HR为0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.73;p 2 = 70.8%)。在最长随访时间(平均随访7.5个月),OS显示ctdna阳性组的生存率降低49% (HR 0.51;95% ci: 0.40-0.64;p 2 = 79.9%)。此外,在KIT外显子11 (KIT11)突变患者的Kaplan-Meier数据汇总分析中,调整后的Cox比例风险模型估计HR为0.66 (95% CI: 0.49-0.89;p = 0.007),有利于ctdna阳性组。结论:该荟萃分析强调了ctDNA作为GIST预后生物标志物的潜力,表明其存在始终与突变亚型中较差的生存结果相关。这些发现支持将ctDNA分析作为疾病监测的微创工具整合到临床实践中,有助于对GIST患者进行更个性化和更精确的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信