Mortality of severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone versus hydrocortisone: a propensity-matched analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Takuya Sato, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Ryota Inokuchi, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Kent Doi
{"title":"Mortality of severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone versus hydrocortisone: a propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Takuya Sato, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Ryota Inokuchi, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Kent Doi","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.

Results: Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).

Conclusion: No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.

甲泼尼龙与氢化可的松治疗重症肺炎的死亡率:倾向匹配分析
背景:皮质类固醇可改善重症肺炎的预后;然而,最有效的类型仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们比较了甲泼尼龙治疗与氢化可的松治疗的重症肺炎患者的死亡率。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们利用日本全国诊断程序联合住院患者数据库,纳入2017年4月至2022年3月期间住院并接受甲基强的松或氢化可的松治疗的成年重症肺炎患者。倾向评分匹配用于调整测量的混杂因素,以住院死亡率为主要结局。结果:在5084例符合条件的患者中,分析了623对配对。氢化可的松组住院死亡率为23.9%,甲基强的松龙组住院死亡率为19.4%(风险差异[RD], 4.5%;95%置信区间[CI] -0.082 ~ 9.1;p = 0.054)。休克患者的亚组分析显示,氢化可的松组的死亡率明显高于甲基强的松组(44.7% vs 30.1%;理查德·道金斯,14.6%;95% ci 1.4-27.8;p = 0.031)。结论:甲泼尼龙与氢化可的松治疗重症肺炎患者住院死亡率无显著差异。然而,经历严重肺炎引起的感染性休克的患者可能从甲基强的松龙治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信