The Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Helicobacter Pylori Screening to the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Protocol for a Cost-Effectiveness Modeling Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Seowoo Bae, Joon Sung Kim, Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Young-Il Kim, Woon Tae Jung, Gwang Ho Baik, Beom Jin Kim, Joongyub Lee, Mina Suh, Jae Gyu Kim
{"title":"The Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Helicobacter Pylori Screening to the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Protocol for a Cost-Effectiveness Modeling Study.","authors":"Seowoo Bae, Joon Sung Kim, Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Young-Il Kim, Woon Tae Jung, Gwang Ho Baik, Beom Jin Kim, Joongyub Lee, Mina Suh, Jae Gyu Kim","doi":"10.2196/72228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Korea, the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was implemented in 1999 and provides biennial endoscopy for adults aged ≥40 years. The NCSP has contributed to the early detection of gastric cancer and reduction of associated mortality in Korea. Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of gastric cancer. Screening for and eradication of H pylori reduces the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer. Previous studies have reported that screening for H pylori is a cost-saving intervention that can significantly decrease gastric cancer burden in areas with a high prevalence of H pylori infection. However, no study has examined whether incorporating H pylori screening into national endoscopic screening is cost effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating H pylori screening into Korea's National Gastric Cancer Screening Program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have developed a Markov model to compare two strategies: (1) endoscopy screening every 2 years starting at the age of 40 years (conventional screening), and (2) H pylori screening at the age of 40 years followed by continuous endoscopy screening every 2 years. We will also conduct a comparative analysis by varying the age at which the H pylori screening is performed. The primary outcome is the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the two strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed to test the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness results. A sensitivity analysis will identify the most influential variables for cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome parameter is the cost-effectiveness of adding H pylori testing to the current NCSP, which is expressed as the ICUR. Costs and utilities are discounted at an annual rate of 4.5%. The ICUR threshold is set at KRW 50 million (US $36,719), which is the South Korean gross domestic product per capita. This research has been funded by a Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant RS-2024-00398474). This study will analyze and synthesize previously published information and is thus exempt from institutional review board approval. Data collection started in June 2024 and was completed in May 2025. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences throughout 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We will examine whether introducing H pylori testing and eradication therapy into the NCSP is a more cost-effective strategy for reducing gastric cancer risk than conventional endoscopy-based screening. Our study also examines the optimal age for H pylori screening, as well as the optimal screening frequency.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/72228.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e72228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Korea, the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was implemented in 1999 and provides biennial endoscopy for adults aged ≥40 years. The NCSP has contributed to the early detection of gastric cancer and reduction of associated mortality in Korea. Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of gastric cancer. Screening for and eradication of H pylori reduces the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer. Previous studies have reported that screening for H pylori is a cost-saving intervention that can significantly decrease gastric cancer burden in areas with a high prevalence of H pylori infection. However, no study has examined whether incorporating H pylori screening into national endoscopic screening is cost effective.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating H pylori screening into Korea's National Gastric Cancer Screening Program.

Methods: We have developed a Markov model to compare two strategies: (1) endoscopy screening every 2 years starting at the age of 40 years (conventional screening), and (2) H pylori screening at the age of 40 years followed by continuous endoscopy screening every 2 years. We will also conduct a comparative analysis by varying the age at which the H pylori screening is performed. The primary outcome is the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the two strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed to test the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness results. A sensitivity analysis will identify the most influential variables for cost-effectiveness.

Results: The primary outcome parameter is the cost-effectiveness of adding H pylori testing to the current NCSP, which is expressed as the ICUR. Costs and utilities are discounted at an annual rate of 4.5%. The ICUR threshold is set at KRW 50 million (US $36,719), which is the South Korean gross domestic product per capita. This research has been funded by a Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant RS-2024-00398474). This study will analyze and synthesize previously published information and is thus exempt from institutional review board approval. Data collection started in June 2024 and was completed in May 2025. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences throughout 2025.

Conclusions: We will examine whether introducing H pylori testing and eradication therapy into the NCSP is a more cost-effective strategy for reducing gastric cancer risk than conventional endoscopy-based screening. Our study also examines the optimal age for H pylori screening, as well as the optimal screening frequency.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/72228.

在韩国国家胃癌筛查项目中加入幽门螺杆菌筛查的成本-效果:成本-效果模型研究的方案。
背景:在韩国,国家癌症筛查计划(NCSP)于1999年实施,为≥40岁的成年人提供两年一次的内窥镜检查。国家胃癌计划为韩国胃癌的早期发现和相关死亡率的降低做出了贡献。幽门螺杆菌是胃癌的主要病因。筛查和根除幽门螺杆菌可降低胃癌的发病率和死亡率。先前的研究报道,幽门螺杆菌筛查是一种节省成本的干预措施,可以显著降低幽门螺杆菌感染高发地区的胃癌负担。然而,没有研究调查将幽门螺杆菌筛查纳入国家内窥镜筛查是否具有成本效益。目的:本研究旨在评估将幽门螺杆菌筛查纳入韩国国家胃癌筛查计划的成本效益。方法:我们建立了一个马尔可夫模型来比较两种策略:(1)从40岁开始每2年进行一次内窥镜筛查(常规筛查),(2)在40岁时进行幽门螺杆菌筛查,然后每2年进行一次连续的内窥镜筛查。我们还将通过改变进行幽门螺杆菌筛查的年龄进行比较分析。主要结果是增量成本效用比(ICUR),通过将增量成本除以两种策略之间的增量质量调整寿命年(QALYs)来计算。将进行概率敏感性分析,以检验成本效益结果的不确定性。敏感性分析将确定对成本效益影响最大的变量。结果:主要结局参数是在现行NCSP中加入幽门螺杆菌检测的成本-效果,以ICUR表示。成本和公用事业按4.5%的年折现率计算。ICUR的门槛设定为5000万韩元(36719美元),这是韩国的人均国内生产总值。本研究由大韩民国卫生福利部以患者为中心的临床研究协调中心资助(授权RS-2024-00398474)。这项研究将分析和综合以前发表的信息,因此不需要机构审查委员会的批准。数据收集始于2024年6月,于2025年5月完成。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在2025年期间在国内和国际会议上发表。结论:我们将研究在NCSP中引入幽门螺杆菌检测和根除治疗是否比传统的基于内窥镜的筛查更能降低胃癌风险。我们的研究还探讨了幽门螺杆菌筛查的最佳年龄,以及最佳筛查频率。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/72228。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信