Prescription of ACE-Is/ARBs in patients with cardio-renal disease: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from the REPOSI registry.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paolo Lido, Silvia Cantiero, Antonio Galluccio, Annalisa Noce, Luca Di Lullo, Roberto Bei, Ferdinando Iellamo, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Alessandro Nobili, Mauro Tettamanti
{"title":"Prescription of ACE-Is/ARBs in patients with cardio-renal disease: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from the REPOSI registry.","authors":"Paolo Lido, Silvia Cantiero, Antonio Galluccio, Annalisa Noce, Luca Di Lullo, Roberto Bei, Ferdinando Iellamo, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Alessandro Nobili, Mauro Tettamanti","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04026-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardio-renal disease is a common clinical condition leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the cornerstone of treatment of chronic cardio-renal disease. Using data from the REPOSI register, we performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective study to determine which factors are associated with the non-prescription or discontinuation of ACE-Is/ARBS in a cohort of 889 cardio-renal patients hospitalized in 109 Italian internal medicine and geriatric wards. Only 55% of the patients with cardio-renal disease of the investigated cohort were on treatment with ACE-Is or ARBs at admission. The primary end point was ACE-Is/ARBs use at discharge. Patients with lower probability of receiving ACE-Is/ARBs at discharge were older and hospitalized for longer periods. Furthermore, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (advanced CKD: eGFR ≤ 29 mL/min/1.73m²) had a much lower (54%) probability of being discharged or continuing ACE-Is/ARBs treatment than those with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m². A more prominent lower probability was found comparing advanced CKD patients with G3 stage CKD patients (eGFR: 59-30 mL/min/1.73m²) in multivariate analyses (OR and 95%CI: 0.37, 0.24-0.57. multivariate p-value < 0.001). The probability of stopping treatment in patients already on treatment with ACE-Is/ARBs at hospital admission (secondary end point) almost reached a threefold increase (OR and 95%CI: 2.82, 1.69-4.71. multivariate p-value < 0.001) when the advanced CKD group was compared with G3 CKD patients. The data of our study are not in line with the recently published updated KDIGO 2024 Guidelines, which recommend patients with advanced CKD to continue treatment with ACE-Is/ARBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04026-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardio-renal disease is a common clinical condition leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the cornerstone of treatment of chronic cardio-renal disease. Using data from the REPOSI register, we performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective study to determine which factors are associated with the non-prescription or discontinuation of ACE-Is/ARBS in a cohort of 889 cardio-renal patients hospitalized in 109 Italian internal medicine and geriatric wards. Only 55% of the patients with cardio-renal disease of the investigated cohort were on treatment with ACE-Is or ARBs at admission. The primary end point was ACE-Is/ARBs use at discharge. Patients with lower probability of receiving ACE-Is/ARBs at discharge were older and hospitalized for longer periods. Furthermore, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (advanced CKD: eGFR ≤ 29 mL/min/1.73m²) had a much lower (54%) probability of being discharged or continuing ACE-Is/ARBs treatment than those with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m². A more prominent lower probability was found comparing advanced CKD patients with G3 stage CKD patients (eGFR: 59-30 mL/min/1.73m²) in multivariate analyses (OR and 95%CI: 0.37, 0.24-0.57. multivariate p-value < 0.001). The probability of stopping treatment in patients already on treatment with ACE-Is/ARBs at hospital admission (secondary end point) almost reached a threefold increase (OR and 95%CI: 2.82, 1.69-4.71. multivariate p-value < 0.001) when the advanced CKD group was compared with G3 CKD patients. The data of our study are not in line with the recently published updated KDIGO 2024 Guidelines, which recommend patients with advanced CKD to continue treatment with ACE-Is/ARBs.

心肾疾病患者ACE-Is/ arb处方:来自REPOSI注册中心的多中心回顾性队列研究
心肾疾病是一种常见的临床疾病,导致发病率和死亡率增加。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-Is)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)是治疗慢性心肾疾病的基石。使用来自REPOSI登记的数据,我们进行了一项多中心、观察性、回顾性研究,以确定在109个意大利内科和老年病房住院的889名心肾患者中,哪些因素与非处方或停药ACE-Is/ARBS相关。在被调查的队列中,只有55%的心肾疾病患者在入院时接受了ACE-Is或arb治疗。主要终点是出院时ACE-Is/ arb的使用情况。出院时接受ACE-Is/ arb可能性较低的患者年龄较大,住院时间较长。此外,晚期慢性肾病患者(晚期CKD: eGFR≤29 mL/min/1.73m²)出院或继续ACE-Is/ arb治疗的概率远低于eGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73m²的患者(54%)。在多变量分析中,晚期CKD患者与G3期CKD患者比较(eGFR: 59-30 mL/min/1.73m²)的概率更低(OR和95%CI: 0.37, 0.24-0.57)。多变量假定值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信