Long Thoracic Nerve Decompression and Transfer: Single-Center Case Series of Clinical and Electromyographic Outcomes.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1177/15589447251343240
Martin Li, Jvalant N Parekh, Devanshi Jimulia, Liron S Duraku, Tahseen Chaudhry, Dominic M Power
{"title":"Long Thoracic Nerve Decompression and Transfer: Single-Center Case Series of Clinical and Electromyographic Outcomes.","authors":"Martin Li, Jvalant N Parekh, Devanshi Jimulia, Liron S Duraku, Tahseen Chaudhry, Dominic M Power","doi":"10.1177/15589447251343240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long thoracic nerve (LTN) decompression is considered in recalcitrant scapular winging secondary to chronic LTN palsy. Nerve transfer, typically from the thoracodorsal nerve (TDN), is suggested if, despite adequate decompression, intraoperative nerve stimulation demonstrates no improvement. Literature concerning transfer is scarce. To evaluate and compare these 2 procedures' clinical and electrical outcomes, we performed a single-center, retrospective case series of all LTN decompression patients with or without transfer for chronic LTN palsy, examining postoperative adapted Medical Research Council (MRC) grades as a primary and electromyography (EMG) stimulation thresholds as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 11 decompression-only and 6 patients undergoing additional transfer over an 8-year period, confirmed with preoperative serratus anterior EMG. Decompression involved proximal and distal neurolysis, with transfer, typically the lateral branch of TDN, reserved for irresponsiveness to intraoperative stimulation following decompression. Adapted pre- and postoperative serratus anterior MRC values were evaluated using a 2-tailed Student <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative adapted MRC grades for all 17 patients was 0; at median 12-month follow-up, this reached 3. The decompression-only preoperative median was 0 and final grade 3; for the transfers, these were 0 and 3.5 respectively, which were insignificantly different. However, time to first recovery, the first clinical evidence of serratus anterior contraction, was significantly different between the decompression-only cohort, at 3 weeks, and transfer, 7 months. Preoperative EMG thresholds were 1.0 mA pre- and 0.1 mA postoperatively; they did not impact final adapted MRC grades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude nerve transfers achieve comparable long-term outcomes where decompression alone did not improve intraoperative nerve stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251343240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251343240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long thoracic nerve (LTN) decompression is considered in recalcitrant scapular winging secondary to chronic LTN palsy. Nerve transfer, typically from the thoracodorsal nerve (TDN), is suggested if, despite adequate decompression, intraoperative nerve stimulation demonstrates no improvement. Literature concerning transfer is scarce. To evaluate and compare these 2 procedures' clinical and electrical outcomes, we performed a single-center, retrospective case series of all LTN decompression patients with or without transfer for chronic LTN palsy, examining postoperative adapted Medical Research Council (MRC) grades as a primary and electromyography (EMG) stimulation thresholds as a secondary outcome.

Methods: We identified 11 decompression-only and 6 patients undergoing additional transfer over an 8-year period, confirmed with preoperative serratus anterior EMG. Decompression involved proximal and distal neurolysis, with transfer, typically the lateral branch of TDN, reserved for irresponsiveness to intraoperative stimulation following decompression. Adapted pre- and postoperative serratus anterior MRC values were evaluated using a 2-tailed Student t test.

Results: Preoperative adapted MRC grades for all 17 patients was 0; at median 12-month follow-up, this reached 3. The decompression-only preoperative median was 0 and final grade 3; for the transfers, these were 0 and 3.5 respectively, which were insignificantly different. However, time to first recovery, the first clinical evidence of serratus anterior contraction, was significantly different between the decompression-only cohort, at 3 weeks, and transfer, 7 months. Preoperative EMG thresholds were 1.0 mA pre- and 0.1 mA postoperatively; they did not impact final adapted MRC grades.

Conclusions: We conclude nerve transfers achieve comparable long-term outcomes where decompression alone did not improve intraoperative nerve stimulation.

胸长神经减压和转移:临床和肌电图结果的单中心病例系列。
背景:长胸神经(LTN)减压被认为是继发于慢性LTN麻痹的顽固性肩胛骨翅膀。神经转移,通常从胸背神经(TDN),建议如果,尽管充分的减压,术中神经刺激没有改善。关于迁移的文献很少。为了评估和比较这两种手术的临床和电结果,我们对所有LTN减压患者进行了单中心回顾性病例系列研究,这些患者有或没有转移慢性LTN麻痹,以术后适应医学研究委员会(MRC)分级为主要指标,以肌电刺激阈值为次要指标。方法:我们确定了11例仅减压和6例在8年内接受额外转移的患者,术前前锯肌肌电图证实了这一点。减压涉及近端和远端神经松解,转移,典型的TDN侧支,在减压后对术中刺激无反应。采用双尾Student t检验评估前锯肌术前和术后的MRC值。结果:17例患者术前适应MRC分级均为0;在中位12个月的随访中,这一数字达到3。单纯减压术前中位评分为0分,最终评分为3分;对于转移,二者分别为0和3.5,差异不显著。然而,第一次恢复的时间(前锯肌收缩的第一个临床证据)在单纯减压组(3周)和转移组(7个月)之间有显著差异。术前肌电阈值为术前1.0 mA,术后0.1 mA;他们不影响最终改编的MRC成绩。结论:我们得出结论,神经移植在单纯减压不能改善术中神经刺激的情况下取得了相当的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信