Does the posterior-only approach provide adequate treatment for cervical spine metastases with severe vertebral body compromise?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zhehuang Li, Panhong Zhang, Xiaoying Niu, Po Li, Xu Liu, Weitao Yao, Jing Wen, Suxia Luo, Peng Zhang
{"title":"Does the posterior-only approach provide adequate treatment for cervical spine metastases with severe vertebral body compromise?","authors":"Zhehuang Li, Panhong Zhang, Xiaoying Niu, Po Li, Xu Liu, Weitao Yao, Jing Wen, Suxia Luo, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09127-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess posterior-only surgery for cervical spine metastases with severe vertebral compromise, characterized by severe compression fracture, ventral epidural compression, and extensive osteolytic destruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with C1-T1 metastases meeting severe compromise criteria: compression fracture with > 50% height collapse or local kyphosis, severe ventral compression with the epidural spinal cord compression scale > 1b, or extensive osteolytic destruction involving > 50% of the vertebral body. Comprehensive clinical assessments included pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), neurological function (Frankel grading system), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG). Radiographic evaluation focused on cervical sagittal alignment parameters. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed in pain (NRS: 6.1 ± 2.0 to 2.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), neurological function (90% of deficit patients improved ≥ 1 Frankel grade), and performance status (ECOG:3.1 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). Cervical sagittal alignment was significantly restored in compression fracture cases. The surgical approach exhibited favorable stability with no instances of instrumentation failure during follow-up. Survival analysis indicated median overall survival of 11.0 months, with survival rates of 87.1%, 67.7%, and 48.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The posterior-only surgical approach can effectively addresses severe vertebral body compromise in cervical metastases, providing durable pain relief, neurological preservation, and stability with acceptable morbidity. Future studies should develop evidence-based algorithms integrating tumor characteristics and patient factors to guide surgical decisions in metastatic cervical spine disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09127-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess posterior-only surgery for cervical spine metastases with severe vertebral compromise, characterized by severe compression fracture, ventral epidural compression, and extensive osteolytic destruction.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with C1-T1 metastases meeting severe compromise criteria: compression fracture with > 50% height collapse or local kyphosis, severe ventral compression with the epidural spinal cord compression scale > 1b, or extensive osteolytic destruction involving > 50% of the vertebral body. Comprehensive clinical assessments included pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), neurological function (Frankel grading system), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG). Radiographic evaluation focused on cervical sagittal alignment parameters. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in pain (NRS: 6.1 ± 2.0 to 2.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), neurological function (90% of deficit patients improved ≥ 1 Frankel grade), and performance status (ECOG:3.1 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). Cervical sagittal alignment was significantly restored in compression fracture cases. The surgical approach exhibited favorable stability with no instances of instrumentation failure during follow-up. Survival analysis indicated median overall survival of 11.0 months, with survival rates of 87.1%, 67.7%, and 48.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively.

Conclusion: The posterior-only surgical approach can effectively addresses severe vertebral body compromise in cervical metastases, providing durable pain relief, neurological preservation, and stability with acceptable morbidity. Future studies should develop evidence-based algorithms integrating tumor characteristics and patient factors to guide surgical decisions in metastatic cervical spine disease.

单纯后路入路是否能为严重椎体损害的颈椎转移瘤提供足够的治疗?
目的:评估颈椎转移性严重椎体损害的单纯后路手术治疗,其特征是严重压缩性骨折、腹侧硬膜外压迫和广泛的溶骨破坏。方法:我们回顾性分析了31例符合严重妥协标准的C1-T1转移患者:压缩性骨折伴> 50%高度塌陷或局部后凸,伴硬膜外脊髓压迫量表> 1b的严重腹侧压迫,或伴> 50%椎体的广泛溶骨性破坏。综合临床评估包括疼痛严重程度(数字评定量表,NRS),神经功能(Frankel评分系统)和性能状态(东部肿瘤合作小组,ECOG)。影像学评价主要集中在颈椎矢状位对准参数上。采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。结果:疼痛有明显改善(NRS: 6.1±2.0至2.3±1.2,P)结论:单纯后路手术可有效解决颈椎转移患者严重的椎体损害,提供持久的疼痛缓解,神经保护和稳定性,发病率可接受。未来的研究应发展基于证据的算法,整合肿瘤特征和患者因素,以指导转移性颈椎疾病的手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信