Impacts of salt restriction on nutritional status, sarcopenia, and mortality of cirrhotic patients with ascites.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Maha Elsabaawy, Mohammed Ragab, Madiha Naguib, Eman Kamal, Maymona Al-Khalifa, Khaled Gamil, Marwa Elfayoumy
{"title":"Impacts of salt restriction on nutritional status, sarcopenia, and mortality of cirrhotic patients with ascites.","authors":"Maha Elsabaawy, Mohammed Ragab, Madiha Naguib, Eman Kamal, Maymona Al-Khalifa, Khaled Gamil, Marwa Elfayoumy","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03830-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salt restriction is a cornerstone in managing ascites in cirrhotic patients; however, its impact on nutritional status, sarcopenia, and mortality remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a salt-restricted diet (SRD) on ascites control, body composition, sarcopenia development, and patient survival in cirrhotic patients with decompensated liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 102 patients with grade III ascites, categorized into two groups based on dietary adherence: Salt-Restricted Diet (SRD), (n = 46) and Salt-Unrestricted Diet (SUD) (n = 56). Sodium intake was assessed using the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) and spot urine Na/K ratio. Nutritional status, sarcopenia, ascites control, and six-month mortality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SRD group showed better ascites control, with fewer paracentesis sessions per month (1.57 ± 0.65 vs. 4.07 ± 1.43, p < 0.001). Sarcopenia was more prevalent in the SRD group (p < 0.001), with lower SMI (4.88 ± 7.13 vs. 16.7 ± 544.8, p < 0.001) and TR PMM (19.03 ± 3.68 vs. 71.92 ± 191.9, p < 0.001). Higher nutritional risk was significantly associated with SRD (p = 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the SRD group (67.4%) compared to the SUD group (35.7%), p = 0.001. Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia (OR = 2.684, p = 0.006) and SRD (OR = 1.65, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While effective in ascites control, sodium restriction may compromise nutritional status, heighten sarcopenia risk, and increase mortality, highlighting the need for a more individualized dietary approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03830-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Salt restriction is a cornerstone in managing ascites in cirrhotic patients; however, its impact on nutritional status, sarcopenia, and mortality remains unclear.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of a salt-restricted diet (SRD) on ascites control, body composition, sarcopenia development, and patient survival in cirrhotic patients with decompensated liver disease.

Methods: This prospective study included 102 patients with grade III ascites, categorized into two groups based on dietary adherence: Salt-Restricted Diet (SRD), (n = 46) and Salt-Unrestricted Diet (SUD) (n = 56). Sodium intake was assessed using the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) and spot urine Na/K ratio. Nutritional status, sarcopenia, ascites control, and six-month mortality were evaluated.

Results: The SRD group showed better ascites control, with fewer paracentesis sessions per month (1.57 ± 0.65 vs. 4.07 ± 1.43, p < 0.001). Sarcopenia was more prevalent in the SRD group (p < 0.001), with lower SMI (4.88 ± 7.13 vs. 16.7 ± 544.8, p < 0.001) and TR PMM (19.03 ± 3.68 vs. 71.92 ± 191.9, p < 0.001). Higher nutritional risk was significantly associated with SRD (p = 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the SRD group (67.4%) compared to the SUD group (35.7%), p = 0.001. Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia (OR = 2.684, p = 0.006) and SRD (OR = 1.65, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion: While effective in ascites control, sodium restriction may compromise nutritional status, heighten sarcopenia risk, and increase mortality, highlighting the need for a more individualized dietary approach.

限盐对肝硬化腹水患者营养状况、肌肉减少症和死亡率的影响。
背景:限盐是处理肝硬化患者腹水的基石;然而,它对营养状况、肌肉减少症和死亡率的影响尚不清楚。目的:评价限盐饮食(SRD)对肝硬化失代偿性肝病患者腹水控制、体成分、肌肉减少症发展和患者生存的影响。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入102例III级腹水患者,根据饮食依从性分为两组:限盐饮食(SRD)组(n = 46)和无盐饮食(SUD)组(n = 56)。采用膳食钠限制问卷(DSRQ)和尿样钠钾比评估钠摄入量。评估营养状况、肌肉减少症、腹水控制和6个月死亡率。结果:SRD组腹水控制较好,每月穿刺次数较少(1.57±0.65 vs 4.07±1.43,p < 0.001)。肌肉减少症在SRD组更为普遍(p < 0.001), SMI(4.88±7.13比16.7±544.8,p < 0.001)和TR PMM(19.03±3.68比71.92±191.9,p < 0.001)较低。较高的营养风险与SRD显著相关(p = 0.001)。SRD组的死亡率(67.4%)明显高于SUD组(35.7%),p = 0.001。多因素分析发现肌肉减少症(OR = 2.684, p = 0.006)和SRD (OR = 1.65, p < 0.001)是死亡率的独立预测因子。结论:虽然对腹水控制有效,但钠限制可能会损害营养状况,增加肌肉减少症的风险,并增加死亡率,因此需要更个性化的饮食方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信