Discontinuity of social support among US adults with cognitive impairment before and after the confirmed diagnosis of dementia: a matched ambidirectional cohort study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Huanyu Zhang, Benjamin R Underwood, Sabina London, Huitong Zhao, Jiazhou Yu, Da Feng, Shanquan Chen
{"title":"Discontinuity of social support among US adults with cognitive impairment before and after the confirmed diagnosis of dementia: a matched ambidirectional cohort study.","authors":"Huanyu Zhang, Benjamin R Underwood, Sabina London, Huitong Zhao, Jiazhou Yu, Da Feng, Shanquan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04264-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increased attention on dementia, much remains unknown about the integration of clinical and non-clinical care, particularly regarding long-term social support, a primary source of non-clinical care. This study uniquely examines the effect of receiving a formal dementia diagnosis on the continuity of social support, an understudied transition point in dementia care pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this ambidirectional cohort study, we examined ten waves of data from the Health and Retirement Survey(HRS) for US adults over 50 through 2000-2018. Eligibility was limited to participants with cognitive impairment. The exposure group were people with a confirmed dementia diagnosis (N = 1261), and the control group were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and survey wave, but without a confirmed diagnosis (N = 12,604). Unmet social support was defined as reporting physical disability without receiving corresponding social support. Physical disability was assessed using measures of basic activities of daily living (BADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). The data were fitted using controlled interrupted time series analysis to explore the continuity of unmet social support before and after a diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After dementia diagnosis, adults experienced a significant increase in unmet IADL support needs (coef = 0.10, 95% CI [0.07, 0.13]), particularly for making phone calls (coef = 0.74, 95% CI [0.16, 1.33]). By race/ethnicity, Hispanics showed a significant rise in unmet BADL support needs (coef = 0.74, 95% CI [0.03, 1.46]), especially for eating assistance (coef = 1.58, 95% CI [0.17, 2.99]). Blacks experienced increased unmet BADL needs in toileting (coef = 1.52, 95% CI [0.57, 2.47]) and IADL support (coef = 0.09, 95% CI [0.00, 0.17]). Sex disparities were also identified, with females showing decreased unmet BADL support(coef =  - 0.55, 95% CI [- 1.03, - 0.06]) but increased unmet IADL support (coef = 0.08, 95% CI [0.04, 0.11]), while males experienced increased unmet toileting (coef = 0.78, 95% CI [0.03, 1.53]) and IADLs support (coef = 0.14, 95% CI [0.10, 0.18]).</p><p><strong>Conslusions: </strong>Our study identifies a disconnect in the care provided to individuals with dementia before and after their diagnosis. Notably, post-diagnosis, we observed substantial disparities in unmet social support needs across various racial groups. This highlights the need for more cohesive and equitable care strategies in the dementia care continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"428"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04264-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite increased attention on dementia, much remains unknown about the integration of clinical and non-clinical care, particularly regarding long-term social support, a primary source of non-clinical care. This study uniquely examines the effect of receiving a formal dementia diagnosis on the continuity of social support, an understudied transition point in dementia care pathways.

Methods: In this ambidirectional cohort study, we examined ten waves of data from the Health and Retirement Survey(HRS) for US adults over 50 through 2000-2018. Eligibility was limited to participants with cognitive impairment. The exposure group were people with a confirmed dementia diagnosis (N = 1261), and the control group were matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and survey wave, but without a confirmed diagnosis (N = 12,604). Unmet social support was defined as reporting physical disability without receiving corresponding social support. Physical disability was assessed using measures of basic activities of daily living (BADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). The data were fitted using controlled interrupted time series analysis to explore the continuity of unmet social support before and after a diagnosis.

Results: After dementia diagnosis, adults experienced a significant increase in unmet IADL support needs (coef = 0.10, 95% CI [0.07, 0.13]), particularly for making phone calls (coef = 0.74, 95% CI [0.16, 1.33]). By race/ethnicity, Hispanics showed a significant rise in unmet BADL support needs (coef = 0.74, 95% CI [0.03, 1.46]), especially for eating assistance (coef = 1.58, 95% CI [0.17, 2.99]). Blacks experienced increased unmet BADL needs in toileting (coef = 1.52, 95% CI [0.57, 2.47]) and IADL support (coef = 0.09, 95% CI [0.00, 0.17]). Sex disparities were also identified, with females showing decreased unmet BADL support(coef =  - 0.55, 95% CI [- 1.03, - 0.06]) but increased unmet IADL support (coef = 0.08, 95% CI [0.04, 0.11]), while males experienced increased unmet toileting (coef = 0.78, 95% CI [0.03, 1.53]) and IADLs support (coef = 0.14, 95% CI [0.10, 0.18]).

Conslusions: Our study identifies a disconnect in the care provided to individuals with dementia before and after their diagnosis. Notably, post-diagnosis, we observed substantial disparities in unmet social support needs across various racial groups. This highlights the need for more cohesive and equitable care strategies in the dementia care continuum.

美国成年认知障碍患者在痴呆确诊前后的社会支持中断:一项匹配的双向队列研究
背景:尽管人们对痴呆症的关注越来越多,但关于临床和非临床护理的整合,特别是长期社会支持(非临床护理的主要来源),仍有许多未知之处。本研究独特地考察了接受正式痴呆症诊断对社会支持连续性的影响,这是痴呆症护理途径中一个未充分研究的过渡点。方法:在这项双向队列研究中,我们检查了2000-2018年美国50岁以上成年人健康与退休调查(HRS)的十波数据。资格仅限于有认知障碍的参与者。暴露组是确诊为痴呆的人(N = 1261),对照组根据年龄、性别、种族/民族和调查浪潮进行匹配,但没有确诊(N = 12604)。未满足的社会支持定义为报告身体残疾而没有得到相应的社会支持。使用基本日常生活活动(BADLs)和工具性日常生活活动(IADLs)来评估身体残疾。数据采用控制中断时间序列分析来探讨诊断前后未满足的社会支持的连续性。结果:痴呆诊断后,成年人未满足的IADL支持需求显著增加(coef = 0.10, 95% CI[0.07, 0.13]),特别是打电话(coef = 0.74, 95% CI[0.16, 1.33])。按种族/民族划分,西班牙裔患者未满足的BADL支持需求显著增加(coef = 0.74, 95% CI[0.03, 1.46]),尤其是饮食援助(coef = 1.58, 95% CI[0.17, 2.99])。黑人在如厕(coef = 1.52, 95% CI[0.57, 2.47])和IADL支持(coef = 0.09, 95% CI[0.00, 0.17])方面的BADL未满足需求增加。性别差异也被发现,女性的未满足BADL支持减少(coef = - 0.55, 95% CI[- 1.03, - 0.06]),但未满足IADL支持增加(coef = 0.08, 95% CI[0.04, 0.11]),而男性的未满足如厕(coef = 0.78, 95% CI[0.03, 1.53])和IADL支持增加(coef = 0.14, 95% CI[0.10, 0.18])。结论:我们的研究确定了对痴呆症患者诊断前后的护理脱节。值得注意的是,在诊断后,我们观察到不同种族群体在未满足的社会支持需求方面存在巨大差异。这突出了在痴呆症护理连续体中需要更有凝聚力和公平的护理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信