Smartphone-based digital templating using presentation software enhances accuracy in equalizing leg length and femoral offset during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Anuwat Pongkunakorn, Siravat Teerasukakul, Siripong Tahwang, Wongsapat Prayatkul
{"title":"Smartphone-based digital templating using presentation software enhances accuracy in equalizing leg length and femoral offset during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.","authors":"Anuwat Pongkunakorn, Siravat Teerasukakul, Siripong Tahwang, Wongsapat Prayatkul","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05976-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restoring femoral offset (FO) and equalizing leg lengths are essential for optimal outcomes and preventing leg length discrepancy (LLD) in bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for femoral neck fractures (FNF) in elderly patients. However, evidence on the benefits of digital templating remains limited. This study evaluates the accuracy of a smartphone-based digital templating method for equalizing leg length and FO in BHA compared to the conventional intraoperative method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 210 patients aged ≥ 60 years with FNF who underwent BHA between June 2018 and May 2023. The templating group (n = 70) used preoperative digital templating with Keynote presentation software on an iPhone, incorporating femoral prosthesis templates. The conventional group (n = 140) relied on intraoperative visual estimation, palpation, and the shuck test. Postoperative LLD and FO differences were assessed radiographically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 74.9 ± 7.3 years (range: 60-95), with 180 (85.7%) women. The templating group achieved a mean LLD of 1.8 ± 3.5 mm (range: -5.6 to 10.2 mm), significantly better than 3.5 ± 5.5 mm (range: -10.9 to 18.4 mm) in the conventional group (p = 0.023). LLD within ± 6 mm was observed in 87.1% (61 cases) of the templating group versus 59.3% (83 cases) in the conventional group (p < 0.001). FO differences averaged 0.8 ± 2.6 mm (range: -7.2 to 6.1 mm) in the templating group, compared to -0.8 ± 3.7 mm (range: -9.8 to 5.7 mm) in the conventional group (p = 0.005). FO differences within ± 5 mm occurred in 92.9% (65 cases) of the templating group versus 82.1% (115 cases) in the conventional group (p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The smartphone-based digital templating method using presentation software enhances the accuracy of leg length and FO equalization during BHA for elderly FNF patients, offering significant advantages over conventional techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05976-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Restoring femoral offset (FO) and equalizing leg lengths are essential for optimal outcomes and preventing leg length discrepancy (LLD) in bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for femoral neck fractures (FNF) in elderly patients. However, evidence on the benefits of digital templating remains limited. This study evaluates the accuracy of a smartphone-based digital templating method for equalizing leg length and FO in BHA compared to the conventional intraoperative method.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 210 patients aged ≥ 60 years with FNF who underwent BHA between June 2018 and May 2023. The templating group (n = 70) used preoperative digital templating with Keynote presentation software on an iPhone, incorporating femoral prosthesis templates. The conventional group (n = 140) relied on intraoperative visual estimation, palpation, and the shuck test. Postoperative LLD and FO differences were assessed radiographically.

Results: The mean patient age was 74.9 ± 7.3 years (range: 60-95), with 180 (85.7%) women. The templating group achieved a mean LLD of 1.8 ± 3.5 mm (range: -5.6 to 10.2 mm), significantly better than 3.5 ± 5.5 mm (range: -10.9 to 18.4 mm) in the conventional group (p = 0.023). LLD within ± 6 mm was observed in 87.1% (61 cases) of the templating group versus 59.3% (83 cases) in the conventional group (p < 0.001). FO differences averaged 0.8 ± 2.6 mm (range: -7.2 to 6.1 mm) in the templating group, compared to -0.8 ± 3.7 mm (range: -9.8 to 5.7 mm) in the conventional group (p = 0.005). FO differences within ± 5 mm occurred in 92.9% (65 cases) of the templating group versus 82.1% (115 cases) in the conventional group (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: The smartphone-based digital templating method using presentation software enhances the accuracy of leg length and FO equalization during BHA for elderly FNF patients, offering significant advantages over conventional techniques.

Level of evidence: III.

使用演示软件的基于智能手机的数字模板提高了股骨颈骨折双极半关节置换术中平衡腿长和股骨偏移的准确性。
背景:在老年患者股骨颈骨折(FNF)双极半关节置换术(BHA)中,恢复股骨偏置(FO)和平衡腿长对于获得最佳结果和防止腿长差异(LLD)至关重要。然而,关于数字模板的好处的证据仍然有限。本研究评估了与传统术中方法相比,基于智能手机的数字模板方法用于平衡BHA的腿长和FO的准确性。方法:对2018年6月至2023年5月期间接受BHA治疗的210例年龄≥60岁FNF患者进行回顾性队列研究。模板组(n = 70)术前在iPhone上使用Keynote演示软件进行数字模板,合并股骨假体模板。常规组(n = 140)依靠术中视觉评估、触诊和脱皮试验。术后LLD和FO的影像学差异评估。结果:患者平均年龄74.9±7.3岁(60 ~ 95岁),女性180例(85.7%)。模板组平均LLD为1.8±3.5 mm(范围:-5.6 ~ 10.2 mm),显著优于常规组的3.5±5.5 mm(范围:-10.9 ~ 18.4 mm) (p = 0.023)。模板组的LLD在±6 mm以内的比例为87.1%(61例),而传统组为59.3%(83例)。(p)结论:基于智能手机的数字模板方法使用呈现软件提高了老年FNF患者BHA时腿长和FO平衡的准确性,与传统技术相比具有显著优势。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信