A Preliminary Assessment on Reproducibility of Triggered Electromyography During Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy.

Bo Xiao, Wenbin Jiang, Nobuhito Morota, Samuel R Browd, Shlomi Constantini, Rong Mei, Min Wei, Wang Junlu, Yunhai Song, Rui Wang, Qijia Zhan
{"title":"A Preliminary Assessment on Reproducibility of Triggered Electromyography During Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy.","authors":"Bo Xiao, Wenbin Jiang, Nobuhito Morota, Samuel R Browd, Shlomi Constantini, Rong Mei, Min Wei, Wang Junlu, Yunhai Song, Rui Wang, Qijia Zhan","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) reduces spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). Intraoperative neurophysiology, triggered electromyography (trigger-EMG) is crucial in guiding sensory rootlet selection, but its reproducibility during SDR surgery has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of trigger-EMG during SDR performed in children with spastic CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for cases where dorsal roots were stimulated twice 1 to 2 minutes apart during SDR using a specific protocol. With single-pulse stimulation of 0.2 ms width having a gradually increasing intensity from 0.01 mA until the EMG amplitude is >200 μV. Criteria were established to evaluate trigger-EMG reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study showed that the reproducibility of trigger-EMG was excellent, as the most responsive channels in the second stimulation trial were the same as those in the first one in 90.1% of the roots stimulated. In addition, the 3 most responsive channels were mostly the same between the first and second stimulation trials in 96.9% of the roots tested. Furthermore, when comparing the evoked EMG pattern since the beginning to the end point between the 2 stimulation trials in all 131 roots, the amplitudes of trigger-EMG in 3 most responsive channels were similar to each other, particularly the most responsive one. Amplitudes of each phase in each EMG evoked were also similar to each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The excellent reproducibility of trigger-EMG, as demonstrated by its consistent activation of specific spinal motor circuits, provides a solid foundation for future research. Further investigation into the underlying electrophysiological mechanisms of this reproducibility could inform the development of more refined stimulation protocols and data analysis techniques. These advancements hold promise for enhancing the accuracy of dorsal root selection during SDR and ultimately improving clinical outcomes for patients with spastic CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"29 2","pages":"255-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) reduces spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). Intraoperative neurophysiology, triggered electromyography (trigger-EMG) is crucial in guiding sensory rootlet selection, but its reproducibility during SDR surgery has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of trigger-EMG during SDR performed in children with spastic CP.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for cases where dorsal roots were stimulated twice 1 to 2 minutes apart during SDR using a specific protocol. With single-pulse stimulation of 0.2 ms width having a gradually increasing intensity from 0.01 mA until the EMG amplitude is >200 μV. Criteria were established to evaluate trigger-EMG reproducibility.

Results: This study showed that the reproducibility of trigger-EMG was excellent, as the most responsive channels in the second stimulation trial were the same as those in the first one in 90.1% of the roots stimulated. In addition, the 3 most responsive channels were mostly the same between the first and second stimulation trials in 96.9% of the roots tested. Furthermore, when comparing the evoked EMG pattern since the beginning to the end point between the 2 stimulation trials in all 131 roots, the amplitudes of trigger-EMG in 3 most responsive channels were similar to each other, particularly the most responsive one. Amplitudes of each phase in each EMG evoked were also similar to each other.

Conclusion: The excellent reproducibility of trigger-EMG, as demonstrated by its consistent activation of specific spinal motor circuits, provides a solid foundation for future research. Further investigation into the underlying electrophysiological mechanisms of this reproducibility could inform the development of more refined stimulation protocols and data analysis techniques. These advancements hold promise for enhancing the accuracy of dorsal root selection during SDR and ultimately improving clinical outcomes for patients with spastic CP.

选择性背根切断术中触发肌电图再现性的初步评价。
背景和目的:选择性背侧神经根切断术(SDR)可减少痉挛性脑瘫(CP)患儿的痉挛。术中神经生理学、触发肌电图(trigger-EMG)在指导感觉神经根选择中至关重要,但其在SDR手术中的可重复性尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是评估痉挛性cp患儿在特别提款权期间触发肌电图的再现性。方法:回顾性回顾在特别提款权期间使用特定方案刺激背根两次,间隔1至2分钟的病例。单脉冲刺激宽度为0.2 ms,刺激强度从0.01 mA逐渐增大,直至肌电幅值达到100 ~ 200 μV。建立了评估触发肌电图再现性的标准。结果:本研究显示触发肌电图的重现性很好,在90.1%的刺激根中,第二次刺激试验中反应最灵敏的通道与第一次相同。此外,96.9%的被测根在第一次和第二次刺激试验中反应最灵敏的3个通道基本相同。此外,在比较两种刺激试验中131根神经从开始到结束的诱发肌电图时,3个最敏感通道的触发肌电图幅值相似,尤其是最敏感通道。各诱发肌电图的各相振幅也相似。结论:触发肌电图具有良好的再现性,其对特定脊髓运动回路的激活具有一致性,为后续研究提供了坚实的基础。进一步研究这种可重复性的潜在电生理机制,可以为开发更精细的刺激方案和数据分析技术提供信息。这些进展有望提高SDR期间背根选择的准确性,并最终改善痉挛性脑瘫患者的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信