Louis-Paul Berthelot, Ludivine Martin, Nourredine Benchir, Bernard Gloanec, Fabien Boulière, Raïssa Braguet, Yann-Pierre Codet, Luc Corbel, Emmanuel Della Negra, Grégoire Léon, François Tariel, Céline Bescond, Claire Richard
{"title":"Decarbonizing urology: Carbon footprint assessment of a minimally invasive vasectomy in a French private hospital.","authors":"Louis-Paul Berthelot, Ludivine Martin, Nourredine Benchir, Bernard Gloanec, Fabien Boulière, Raïssa Braguet, Yann-Pierre Codet, Luc Corbel, Emmanuel Della Negra, Grégoire Léon, François Tariel, Céline Bescond, Claire Richard","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the carbon footprint of a complete care pathway for minimally invasive vasectomy and to identify the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions, with the aim of proposing concrete strategies for reduction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Carbon emissions were calculated using the Bilan Carbone® methodology (ADEME), incorporating the following components: energy consumption, procurement, patient and staff transportation, food services, infrastructure and capital equipment, fugitive emissions, freight transport and waste management. Each stage of the care pathway - clinical consultations, surgical procedure, and postoperative semen analysis - was modeled. Emissions were expressed in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq), based on emission factors from the Base Empreinte® and the Carebone® tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean carbon footprint of a vasectomy care pathway was estimated at 73.42kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq. Patient transportation accounted for the largest share of emissions (69.7%), followed by medical consumables (21.5%). The remaining categories, energy use, waste management, food, and staff transport, contributed less than 10% of total emissions combined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive vasectomy is associated with a relatively low carbon footprint, primarily attributable to patient transportation and disposable medical supplies. Streamlining the care pathway - by performing the surgery in a procedure room, promoting teleconsultation, utilizing reusable equipment, and eliminating non-mandatory steps - could further reduce its environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the carbon footprint of a complete care pathway for minimally invasive vasectomy and to identify the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions, with the aim of proposing concrete strategies for reduction.
Materials and methods: Carbon emissions were calculated using the Bilan Carbone® methodology (ADEME), incorporating the following components: energy consumption, procurement, patient and staff transportation, food services, infrastructure and capital equipment, fugitive emissions, freight transport and waste management. Each stage of the care pathway - clinical consultations, surgical procedure, and postoperative semen analysis - was modeled. Emissions were expressed in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO2eq), based on emission factors from the Base Empreinte® and the Carebone® tool.
Results: The mean carbon footprint of a vasectomy care pathway was estimated at 73.42kgCO2eq. Patient transportation accounted for the largest share of emissions (69.7%), followed by medical consumables (21.5%). The remaining categories, energy use, waste management, food, and staff transport, contributed less than 10% of total emissions combined.
Conclusion: Minimally invasive vasectomy is associated with a relatively low carbon footprint, primarily attributable to patient transportation and disposable medical supplies. Streamlining the care pathway - by performing the surgery in a procedure room, promoting teleconsultation, utilizing reusable equipment, and eliminating non-mandatory steps - could further reduce its environmental impact.