Machine Learning Analysis of Intensity Profiles and Key Indicators in Standard Microcycle of Professional Male Soccer Players.

IF 1.6
Guglielmo Pillitteri, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Tindaro Bongiovanni, Marco Petrucci, Antonino Bianco, Marco Beato, Giuseppe Battaglia
{"title":"Machine Learning Analysis of Intensity Profiles and Key Indicators in Standard Microcycle of Professional Male Soccer Players.","authors":"Guglielmo Pillitteri, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Tindaro Bongiovanni, Marco Petrucci, Antonino Bianco, Marco Beato, Giuseppe Battaglia","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2025.2521495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined intensity profiles and key load indicators across different Match Days (MD) and playing positions within a standard microcycle in professional soccer. Longitudinal observational study with a machine learning-based analytical approach. Twenty-nine Italian Serie B players (25.9 ± 4.2 years) were monitored across 91 training sessions and 38 official matches during the 2023-2024 season. A total of 2,204 observations were recorded, categorizing players into six positional groups. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was used to predict MD types (MD + 1, MD + 2, MD + 3, MD-3, MD-2, MD-1, and MD) based on external (Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS data) and internal (Rating of Perceived Exertion, RPE) load indicators. The model achieved 84% accuracy with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, effectively classifying MD types. K-means clustering categorized intensity profiles into low, medium, and high levels, while feature importance analysis identified key variables. Significant interactions were found between playing position and MD types for total distance/min (F(25, 2168) = 2.764, <i>p</i> < .001), decelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.58, <i>p</i> = .033), and distance per minute at 0-7 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 2.41, <i>p</i> < .001). No significant differences emerged for distance per minute > 14.4 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.952, <i>p</i> = .531), distance per minute > 19.8 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.843, <i>p</i> = .688), or accelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.28, <i>p</i> = .162). Positional differences in training intensity across MD types, provide coaches with data-driven insights for optimizing training loads and recovery strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2521495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined intensity profiles and key load indicators across different Match Days (MD) and playing positions within a standard microcycle in professional soccer. Longitudinal observational study with a machine learning-based analytical approach. Twenty-nine Italian Serie B players (25.9 ± 4.2 years) were monitored across 91 training sessions and 38 official matches during the 2023-2024 season. A total of 2,204 observations were recorded, categorizing players into six positional groups. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was used to predict MD types (MD + 1, MD + 2, MD + 3, MD-3, MD-2, MD-1, and MD) based on external (Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS data) and internal (Rating of Perceived Exertion, RPE) load indicators. The model achieved 84% accuracy with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, effectively classifying MD types. K-means clustering categorized intensity profiles into low, medium, and high levels, while feature importance analysis identified key variables. Significant interactions were found between playing position and MD types for total distance/min (F(25, 2168) = 2.764, p < .001), decelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.58, p = .033), and distance per minute at 0-7 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 2.41, p < .001). No significant differences emerged for distance per minute > 14.4 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.952, p = .531), distance per minute > 19.8 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.843, p = .688), or accelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.28, p = .162). Positional differences in training intensity across MD types, provide coaches with data-driven insights for optimizing training loads and recovery strategies.

职业男子足球运动员标准微循环强度特征及关键指标的机器学习分析。
本研究考察了职业足球在一个标准的微周期内不同比赛日(MD)和比赛位置的强度概况和关键负荷指标。基于机器学习分析方法的纵向观察研究。在2023-2024赛季,对29名意大利乙级球员(25.9±4.2岁)进行了91次训练和38场正式比赛的监测。总共记录了2204次观察,将球员分为六个位置组。基于外部(全球导航卫星系统,GNSS数据)和内部(感知消耗等级,RPE)负载指标,使用光梯度增强机(LightGBM)模型预测MD类型(MD + 1、MD + 2、MD + 3、MD-3、MD-2、MD-1和MD)。该模型达到了84%的准确率,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.97,有效地分类了MD类型。K-means聚类将强度概况分为低、中、高水平,而特征重要性分析确定了关键变量。在总距离/分钟(F(25,2168) = 2.764, p p = 0.033)、0-7 km/h的每分钟距离(F(25,2168) = 2.41, p 14.4 km/h (F(25,2168) = 0.952, p = 0.531)、每分钟距离> 19.8 km/h (F(25,2168) = 0.843, p = 0.688)或加速度/分钟(F(25,2168) = 1.28, p = 0.162)之间发现了显著的相互作用。不同MD类型训练强度的位置差异,为教练提供数据驱动的见解,以优化训练负荷和恢复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信