Comparison of Local Heat and Massage on the Outcomes of Venous Cannulation in Hospitalized Children with Difficult Venous Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Samieh Naseri, Hanieh Neshat, Saeed Musavi, Fatemeh Ghorbani
{"title":"Comparison of Local Heat and Massage on the Outcomes of Venous Cannulation in Hospitalized Children with Difficult Venous Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Samieh Naseri, Hanieh Neshat, Saeed Musavi, Fatemeh Ghorbani","doi":"10.1080/24694193.2025.2530477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral venous cannulation is a common invasive procedure with a high failure rate, particularly challenging in children and young patients due to their unique anatomical characteristics. This study evaluated the effectiveness of local heat and massage in facilitating venous access in hospitalized children with difficult access. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Children's Hospital in Tabriz from December 20, 2023, to May 9, 2024. Ninety-six children aged 6 to 12 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups: two intervention groups and one control group. In the first intervention group, an electric heating pad at 40 ± 2 degrees Celsius was applied to the venous access site for 5 minutes. In the second intervention group, a gentle circular massage from the wrist to the cubital fossa was performed for at least 2 minutes. Outcomes included pain scores using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), time spent, and number of attempts for venous access, along with vein assessment using the Vein Assessment Scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. No significant differences were found in demographic factors among the groups (<i>p</i> > .05). The vein assessment showed improved visibility and palpability with local heat and massage. Pain scores significantly decreased in both intervention groups (<i>p</i> ≤ .001), with the local heat group reporting lower mean pain scores and shorter cannulation duration compared to the massage group (<i>p</i> ≤ .001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of cannulation attempts (<i>p</i> > .05). Applying local heat and massaging the venous cannulation site prior to venous cannulation significantly increases the ease of venous access. However, in a comparison of these two methods, local heat was more effective than massage in reducing perceived pain in children with difficult access. Therefore, using local heat can be recommended as a simple and cost-effective intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72655,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2025.2530477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral venous cannulation is a common invasive procedure with a high failure rate, particularly challenging in children and young patients due to their unique anatomical characteristics. This study evaluated the effectiveness of local heat and massage in facilitating venous access in hospitalized children with difficult access. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Children's Hospital in Tabriz from December 20, 2023, to May 9, 2024. Ninety-six children aged 6 to 12 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to three groups: two intervention groups and one control group. In the first intervention group, an electric heating pad at 40 ± 2 degrees Celsius was applied to the venous access site for 5 minutes. In the second intervention group, a gentle circular massage from the wrist to the cubital fossa was performed for at least 2 minutes. Outcomes included pain scores using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), time spent, and number of attempts for venous access, along with vein assessment using the Vein Assessment Scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. No significant differences were found in demographic factors among the groups (p > .05). The vein assessment showed improved visibility and palpability with local heat and massage. Pain scores significantly decreased in both intervention groups (p ≤ .001), with the local heat group reporting lower mean pain scores and shorter cannulation duration compared to the massage group (p ≤ .001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of cannulation attempts (p > .05). Applying local heat and massaging the venous cannulation site prior to venous cannulation significantly increases the ease of venous access. However, in a comparison of these two methods, local heat was more effective than massage in reducing perceived pain in children with difficult access. Therefore, using local heat can be recommended as a simple and cost-effective intervention.

一项随机对照试验:局部热敷与按摩对住院静脉通道困难患儿静脉插管效果的比较
外周静脉插管是一种常见的侵入性手术,失败率很高,由于其独特的解剖特点,对儿童和青少年患者尤其具有挑战性。本研究评估局部加热和按摩在促进静脉通路困难的住院儿童的有效性。于2023年12月20日至2024年5月9日在大不里士儿童医院进行了一项单盲随机对照试验。96名6至12岁的儿童被随机分为三组:两个干预组和一个对照组。第一干预组在静脉通路部位敷40±2℃电热垫5分钟。在第二个干预组,从手腕到肘窝进行轻柔的圆形按摩至少2分钟。结果包括使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)的疼痛评分,花费的时间和尝试静脉通路的次数,以及使用静脉评估量表(VAS)的静脉评估。数据分析采用SPSS version 23。组间人口学因素差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。静脉评估显示,局部加热和按摩可改善静脉的可视性和触感。两个干预组的疼痛评分均显著降低(p≤0.001),与按摩组相比,局部热组的平均疼痛评分较低,插管时间较短(p≤0.001)。两组间插管次数差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在静脉插管之前,对静脉插管部位进行局部加热和按摩,可显著增加静脉通路的便利性。然而,在这两种方法的比较中,局部加热比按摩更有效地减轻难以接触的儿童的感知疼痛。因此,可以推荐使用局部加热作为一种简单且具有成本效益的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信