A dimensional approach to psychosis: identifying cognition, depression, and thought disorder factors in a clinical sample.

IF 4.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mikkel Schöttner Sieler, Philippe Golay, Sandra Vieira, Luis Alameda, Philippe Conus, Paul Klauser, Raoul Jenni, Jagruti Patel, Thomas A W Bolton, Patric Hagmann
{"title":"A dimensional approach to psychosis: identifying cognition, depression, and thought disorder factors in a clinical sample.","authors":"Mikkel Schöttner Sieler, Philippe Golay, Sandra Vieira, Luis Alameda, Philippe Conus, Paul Klauser, Raoul Jenni, Jagruti Patel, Thomas A W Bolton, Patric Hagmann","doi":"10.1038/s41537-025-00641-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional classification systems based on broad nosological categories do not adequately capture the high heterogeneity of mental illness. One possible solution to this is to move to a multi-dimensional model of mental illness, as has been proposed by the Research Domain Criteria and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology frameworks. In this study, we explored the dimensional structure of psychotic disorders. We focused on the question whether combining measures of psychosis with cognitive and depression-related measures results in meaningful, clinically relevant, and valid latent dimensions in a sample of early psychosis (n = 113) and chronic schizophrenia patients (n = 43, total n = 156). We used exploratory factor analysis to identify the symptom dimensions in the Lausanne Psychosis data, a multi-modal prospective data set that includes a broad behavioral assessment of patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders. We evaluated the validity of these dimensions by regressing them to several functioning measures. Our analysis revealed three dimensions: Cognition, Depression/Negative, and Thought Disorder, explaining 49.2% of the variance. They were related to measures of functioning, the R² ranging between 0.38 and 0.42. This study advances the development of a multi-dimensional characterization of psychotic disorders by identifying three symptom dimensions with predictive validity in people with psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"11 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00641-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional classification systems based on broad nosological categories do not adequately capture the high heterogeneity of mental illness. One possible solution to this is to move to a multi-dimensional model of mental illness, as has been proposed by the Research Domain Criteria and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology frameworks. In this study, we explored the dimensional structure of psychotic disorders. We focused on the question whether combining measures of psychosis with cognitive and depression-related measures results in meaningful, clinically relevant, and valid latent dimensions in a sample of early psychosis (n = 113) and chronic schizophrenia patients (n = 43, total n = 156). We used exploratory factor analysis to identify the symptom dimensions in the Lausanne Psychosis data, a multi-modal prospective data set that includes a broad behavioral assessment of patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders. We evaluated the validity of these dimensions by regressing them to several functioning measures. Our analysis revealed three dimensions: Cognition, Depression/Negative, and Thought Disorder, explaining 49.2% of the variance. They were related to measures of functioning, the R² ranging between 0.38 and 0.42. This study advances the development of a multi-dimensional characterization of psychotic disorders by identifying three symptom dimensions with predictive validity in people with psychosis.

Abstract Image

精神病的维度方法:在临床样本中识别认知、抑郁和思维障碍因素。
基于广泛的病种分类的传统分类系统不能充分反映精神疾病的高度异质性。一个可能的解决方案是转向精神疾病的多维模型,正如精神病理学框架的研究领域标准和层次分类法所提出的那样。在这项研究中,我们探索了精神障碍的维度结构。我们关注的问题是,在早期精神病患者(n = 113)和慢性精神分裂症患者(n = 43,总n = 156)的样本中,将精神病测量与认知和抑郁相关测量相结合是否会产生有意义、临床相关和有效的潜在维度。我们使用探索性因素分析来确定洛桑精神病数据中的症状维度,这是一个多模式前瞻性数据集,包括对诊断为精神障碍的患者的广泛行为评估。我们通过将这些维度回归到几个功能测量来评估它们的有效性。我们的分析揭示了三个维度:认知、抑郁/消极和思维障碍,解释了49.2%的差异。它们与功能测量有关,R²在0.38到0.42之间。本研究通过确定精神病患者具有预测效度的三个症状维度,促进了精神障碍多维特征的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信