View of current vascular surgery on asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Q4 Medicine
R Vlachovský, T Novotný, R Staffa
{"title":"View of current vascular surgery on asymptomatic carotid stenosis.","authors":"R Vlachovský, T Novotný, R Staffa","doi":"10.48095/ccrvch2025252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the significant progress in the outcomes of conservative treatment for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis has sparked discussions about the most effective invasive treatment. The necessity of such treatment is still being debated in certain cases. Several studies have already been conducted to find the most appropriate approach for asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis, while others are still randomizing and awaiting results. A major unanswered question is whether revascularization is more beneficial than intensive conservative treatment, particularly in view of the lower stroke rates achieved in recent years without conventional or endovascular intervention. The long-term goal should be to identify a subset of patients who would benefit from conservative treatment. In this text, we summarize the issue in the context of the results of two recently completed pivotal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"104 6","pages":"252-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the significant progress in the outcomes of conservative treatment for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis has sparked discussions about the most effective invasive treatment. The necessity of such treatment is still being debated in certain cases. Several studies have already been conducted to find the most appropriate approach for asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis, while others are still randomizing and awaiting results. A major unanswered question is whether revascularization is more beneficial than intensive conservative treatment, particularly in view of the lower stroke rates achieved in recent years without conventional or endovascular intervention. The long-term goal should be to identify a subset of patients who would benefit from conservative treatment. In this text, we summarize the issue in the context of the results of two recently completed pivotal studies.

无症状颈动脉狭窄的血管外科治疗现状。
近年来,无症状颈动脉狭窄患者保守治疗结果的显著进展引发了关于最有效的侵入性治疗的讨论。在某些情况下,这种治疗的必要性仍在辩论中。已经进行了几项研究,为无症状颈动脉狭窄患者寻找最合适的方法,而其他研究仍在随机化,等待结果。一个悬而未决的主要问题是血运重建术是否比强化保守治疗更有益,特别是考虑到近年来在没有常规或血管内干预的情况下卒中发生率较低。长期目标应该是确定能从保守治疗中获益的患者亚群。在本文中,我们总结了两个最近完成的关键研究结果的背景下的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信