{"title":"The Impact of Coercive Measures on the Therapeutic Relationship Between Patients and Nurses in the Acute Psychiatric Care. An Integrative Review.","authors":"Florian Wostry, Sabine Hahn, Berta Schrems","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The reduction of coercion requires a stable therapeutic relationship. It is generally assumed that coercive measures have a negative effect on the therapeutic relationship, but little is known about the specific impact.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>What is the impact of coercive measures in acute psychiatric care on the therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An integrative review and a thematic analysis were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Theme 1, labelled 'Destructive effects', encompasses three subthemes: 'Loss of trust', 'Power imbalance' and 'Engagement reduction' and highlights the negative impact on the therapeutic relationship. Theme 2, entitled 'Nursing dilemma', with the subtheme 'Dehumanisation' discusses the inherent conflicts faced by mental health nurses. Theme 3, 'Reinforcement', suggests potential enhancements in therapeutic relationships.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Key characteristics of the therapeutic relationship, such as providing support, meeting at eye level, empathy and trust, can suffer damage from coercive measures and diminish a fundamental aspect of psychiatric nursing. Moreover, the absence of a therapeutic relationship can foster behaviours that prompt additional coercive measures, creating a negative cycle with adverse effects for all involved.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurses need to be aware of the effects of coercive measures on therapeutic relationships and use coercive measures as a last resort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The reduction of coercion requires a stable therapeutic relationship. It is generally assumed that coercive measures have a negative effect on the therapeutic relationship, but little is known about the specific impact.
Question: What is the impact of coercive measures in acute psychiatric care on the therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients?
Method: An integrative review and a thematic analysis were undertaken.
Results: Theme 1, labelled 'Destructive effects', encompasses three subthemes: 'Loss of trust', 'Power imbalance' and 'Engagement reduction' and highlights the negative impact on the therapeutic relationship. Theme 2, entitled 'Nursing dilemma', with the subtheme 'Dehumanisation' discusses the inherent conflicts faced by mental health nurses. Theme 3, 'Reinforcement', suggests potential enhancements in therapeutic relationships.
Discussion: Key characteristics of the therapeutic relationship, such as providing support, meeting at eye level, empathy and trust, can suffer damage from coercive measures and diminish a fundamental aspect of psychiatric nursing. Moreover, the absence of a therapeutic relationship can foster behaviours that prompt additional coercive measures, creating a negative cycle with adverse effects for all involved.
Implications for practice: Nurses need to be aware of the effects of coercive measures on therapeutic relationships and use coercive measures as a last resort.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally.
All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.