Predictive factors for bladder function recovery following cervical OPLL surgery: a comprehensive analysis.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yusuke Setojima, Kengo Fujii, Toru Funayama, Toshitaka Yoshii, Satoru Egawa, Takashi Hirai, Hiroshi Takahashi, Masashi Yamazaki, Masao Koda
{"title":"Predictive factors for bladder function recovery following cervical OPLL surgery: a comprehensive analysis.","authors":"Yusuke Setojima, Kengo Fujii, Toru Funayama, Toshitaka Yoshii, Satoru Egawa, Takashi Hirai, Hiroshi Takahashi, Masashi Yamazaki, Masao Koda","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Neurogenic bladder dysfunction, a condition affecting both bladder storage and voiding function, remains a primary source of morbidity in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments (OPLL). Prognosticating the functional outcomes of bladder function postoperatively in patients with cervical OPLL is crucial for patient counseling, rehabilitation planning, and discharge protocols. However, a validated prediction model for bladder function outcomes is currently unavailable. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, a comprehensive assessment tool for cervical compressive myelopathy, comprises six domains: upper extremity motor function, lower extremity motor function, upper extremity sensory function, trunk sensory function, lower extremity sensory function, and bladder function. The total score ranges from -2 to 17.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the correlation between postoperative bladder function outcomes and preoperative parameters, including the JOA score, with an aim to identify independent prognostic factors for bladder function recovery one year postoperatively in patients with OPLL.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective review of prospectively collected data across multiple institutions.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Data were collected from 477 patients who underwent surgical intervention for cervical OPLL. After applying the exclusion criteria, data from 192 patients were included in the final analysis. The following variables were examined at the initial presentation: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, preoperative JOA score, OPLL occupation ratio, K-line, surgical approach, spinal fusion, and number of vertebral levels involved.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative bladder function outcomes one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed utilizing the Cox proportional hazards regression model. This study was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant number 23ek0109541h0003; total amount: $85,000). All authors have disclosed financial relationships in accordance with ICMJE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable analyses revealed that age (p=.003), preoperative JOA lower extremity motor function score (p<.001), and preoperative JOA trunk sensory function score significantly influenced bladder function recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that preoperative JOA scores of 1.5 points for both lower extremity motor function and trunk sensory function were the optimal thresholds for predicting complete bladder function recovery (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, preoperative JOA lower extremity motor function score, and JOA trunk sensory function score were identified as significant predictors of bladder function recovery following cervical OPLL surgery and may be used to develop a prediction model to guide clinical decision-making and facilitate patient counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.07.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Neurogenic bladder dysfunction, a condition affecting both bladder storage and voiding function, remains a primary source of morbidity in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments (OPLL). Prognosticating the functional outcomes of bladder function postoperatively in patients with cervical OPLL is crucial for patient counseling, rehabilitation planning, and discharge protocols. However, a validated prediction model for bladder function outcomes is currently unavailable. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, a comprehensive assessment tool for cervical compressive myelopathy, comprises six domains: upper extremity motor function, lower extremity motor function, upper extremity sensory function, trunk sensory function, lower extremity sensory function, and bladder function. The total score ranges from -2 to 17.

Purpose: To determine the correlation between postoperative bladder function outcomes and preoperative parameters, including the JOA score, with an aim to identify independent prognostic factors for bladder function recovery one year postoperatively in patients with OPLL.

Study design/setting: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data across multiple institutions.

Patient sample: Data were collected from 477 patients who underwent surgical intervention for cervical OPLL. After applying the exclusion criteria, data from 192 patients were included in the final analysis. The following variables were examined at the initial presentation: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, preoperative JOA score, OPLL occupation ratio, K-line, surgical approach, spinal fusion, and number of vertebral levels involved.

Outcome measures: Postoperative bladder function outcomes one year after surgery.

Methods: Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed utilizing the Cox proportional hazards regression model. This study was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant number 23ek0109541h0003; total amount: $85,000). All authors have disclosed financial relationships in accordance with ICMJE guidelines.

Results: Multivariable analyses revealed that age (p=.003), preoperative JOA lower extremity motor function score (p<.001), and preoperative JOA trunk sensory function score significantly influenced bladder function recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that preoperative JOA scores of 1.5 points for both lower extremity motor function and trunk sensory function were the optimal thresholds for predicting complete bladder function recovery (p<.001).

Conclusion: Age, preoperative JOA lower extremity motor function score, and JOA trunk sensory function score were identified as significant predictors of bladder function recovery following cervical OPLL surgery and may be used to develop a prediction model to guide clinical decision-making and facilitate patient counseling.

颈椎病后OPLL术后膀胱功能恢复的预测因素:综合分析。
背景:神经源性膀胱功能障碍,一种影响膀胱储存和排尿功能的疾病,仍然是颈后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)患者发病的主要原因。预测颈椎OPLL患者术后膀胱功能的预后对患者咨询、康复计划和出院方案至关重要。然而,目前还没有一个有效的膀胱功能预后预测模型。日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association, JOA)评分是颈椎病压缩性脊髓病的综合评估工具,包括上肢运动功能、下肢运动功能、上肢感觉功能、躯干感觉功能、下肢感觉功能和膀胱功能六个领域。总分在-2到17之间。目的:确定OPLL患者术后膀胱功能结局与术前参数(包括JOA评分)的相关性,旨在确定OPLL患者术后1年膀胱功能恢复的独立预后因素。研究设计/设置:对多个机构前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。患者样本:数据收集自477例接受手术治疗颈椎OPLL的患者。应用排除标准后,192例患者的数据被纳入最终分析。在初次就诊时检查以下变量:年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、术前JOA评分、OPLL占位率、k线、手术入路、脊柱融合和受累椎节段数。结局指标:术后1年膀胱功能结局。方法:采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行单变量和多变量分析。本研究由日本医学研究与发展机构资助(资助号23ek0109541h0003;总金额:8.5万美元)。所有作者均按照ICMJE准则披露了财务关系。结果:多变量分析显示,年龄(p= 0.003)、术前JOA下肢运动功能评分(p= 0.003)、JOA躯干感觉功能评分是颈OPLL术后膀胱功能恢复的显著预测因子,可用于建立预测模型,指导临床决策和患者咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信