Jeremiah Jones, Ashkan Ertefaie, Robert L Strawderman
{"title":"Causal mediation analysis: selection with asymptotically valid inference.","authors":"Jeremiah Jones, Ashkan Ertefaie, Robert L Strawderman","doi":"10.1093/jrsssb/qkae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers are often interested in learning not only the effect of treatments on outcomes, but also the mechanisms that transmit these effects. A mediator is a variable that is affected by treatment and subsequently affects outcome. Existing methods for penalized mediation analyses may lead to ignoring important mediators and either assume that finite-dimensional linear models are sufficient to remove confounding bias, or perform no confounding control at all. In practice, these assumptions may not hold. We propose a method that considers the confounding functions as nuisance parameters to be estimated using data-adaptive methods. We then use a novel regularization method applied to this objective function to identify a set of important mediators. We consider natural direct and indirect effects as our target parameters. We then proceed to derive the asymptotic properties of our estimators and establish the oracle property under specific assumptions. Asymptotic results are also presented in a local setting, which contrast the proposal with the standard adaptive lasso. We also propose a perturbation bootstrap technique to provide asymptotically valid postselection inference for the mediated effects of interest. The performance of these methods will be discussed and demonstrated through simulation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49982,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology","volume":"87 3","pages":"678-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkae109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Researchers are often interested in learning not only the effect of treatments on outcomes, but also the mechanisms that transmit these effects. A mediator is a variable that is affected by treatment and subsequently affects outcome. Existing methods for penalized mediation analyses may lead to ignoring important mediators and either assume that finite-dimensional linear models are sufficient to remove confounding bias, or perform no confounding control at all. In practice, these assumptions may not hold. We propose a method that considers the confounding functions as nuisance parameters to be estimated using data-adaptive methods. We then use a novel regularization method applied to this objective function to identify a set of important mediators. We consider natural direct and indirect effects as our target parameters. We then proceed to derive the asymptotic properties of our estimators and establish the oracle property under specific assumptions. Asymptotic results are also presented in a local setting, which contrast the proposal with the standard adaptive lasso. We also propose a perturbation bootstrap technique to provide asymptotically valid postselection inference for the mediated effects of interest. The performance of these methods will be discussed and demonstrated through simulation studies.
期刊介绍:
Series B (Statistical Methodology) aims to publish high quality papers on the methodological aspects of statistics and data science more broadly. The objective of papers should be to contribute to the understanding of statistical methodology and/or to develop and improve statistical methods; any mathematical theory should be directed towards these aims. The kinds of contribution considered include descriptions of new methods of collecting or analysing data, with the underlying theory, an indication of the scope of application and preferably a real example. Also considered are comparisons, critical evaluations and new applications of existing methods, contributions to probability theory which have a clear practical bearing (including the formulation and analysis of stochastic models), statistical computation or simulation where original methodology is involved and original contributions to the foundations of statistical science. Reviews of methodological techniques are also considered. A paper, even if correct and well presented, is likely to be rejected if it only presents straightforward special cases of previously published work, if it is of mathematical interest only, if it is too long in relation to the importance of the new material that it contains or if it is dominated by computations or simulations of a routine nature.