{"title":"Effects of inbreeding on balancing selection: insights from Fisher's geometric model.","authors":"Colin Olito, Tim Connallon","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.