Examining the Influence of Shift Length on Nurse Fatigue, Patient Care, Quality of Life, and Work-Life Dynamics in a Tertiary Hospital in Oman: Comparative Study.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/nrp/7946997
Asma Al Yahyaei, Eman Al Rabaani, Rahaf Alkasbi, Yumna Alhashmi, Ibrahim Al Hatmi
{"title":"Examining the Influence of Shift Length on Nurse Fatigue, Patient Care, Quality of Life, and Work-Life Dynamics in a Tertiary Hospital in Oman: Comparative Study.","authors":"Asma Al Yahyaei, Eman Al Rabaani, Rahaf Alkasbi, Yumna Alhashmi, Ibrahim Al Hatmi","doi":"10.1155/nrp/7946997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The adoption of 12-h shifts in response to workforce shortages has raised questions about their impact on nurses' well-being and patient care quality. While international studies offer mixed findings, little is known about these effects in the Omani context. <b>Aim:</b> To compare the effects of 8-h and 12-h shifts on nurse fatigue, quality of life, satisfaction, turnover intention, and perceived patient care in a tertiary hospital in Oman. <b>Methods:</b> A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted with 100 nurses from Sultan Qaboos University Hospital using self-administered surveys. Descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and chi-square tests were performed to compare outcomes across shift types. A multiple regression analysis was also conducted to assess predictors of quality of life, controlling for shift type, age, gender, marital status, satisfaction, fatigue, and unit assignment. <b>Results:</b> Nurses working 12-h shifts reported significantly higher levels of fatigue (<i>p</i> < 0.001; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.82) but also reported higher quality of life (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>d</i> = 0.91) and greater satisfaction with their shift length (<i>p</i>=0.001; <i>d</i> = 0.72). No significant differences were found in turnover intention. Patient falls were more frequently reported among 12-h shift nurses, while other safety incidents showed no significant variation. A multiple regression model predicting QOL was significant (<i>F</i>(16, 83) = 9.64, <i>p</i> < 0.001, adjusted <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.583). Satisfaction with shift was the strongest positive predictor (<i>β</i> = 0.432, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI [0.117, 0.287]), while working a 12-h shift had a significant negative association with QOL (<i>β</i> = -0.232, <i>p</i>=0.004, 95% CI [-0.603, -0.117]). Marital status showed a marginally significant positive effect (<i>β</i> = 0.180, <i>p</i>=0.051, 95% CI [-0.001, 0.555]). <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite increased fatigue, nurses working 12-h shifts reported higher quality of life, possibly due to more days off and enhanced work-life balance. However, elevated fatigue and fall rates warrant caution. The findings underscore the importance of implementing flexible and individualized scheduling policies rather than universally adopting 12-h shifts. Further longitudinal studies are needed to explore long-term effects of shift length on nurse and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7946997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/7946997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adoption of 12-h shifts in response to workforce shortages has raised questions about their impact on nurses' well-being and patient care quality. While international studies offer mixed findings, little is known about these effects in the Omani context. Aim: To compare the effects of 8-h and 12-h shifts on nurse fatigue, quality of life, satisfaction, turnover intention, and perceived patient care in a tertiary hospital in Oman. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted with 100 nurses from Sultan Qaboos University Hospital using self-administered surveys. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests were performed to compare outcomes across shift types. A multiple regression analysis was also conducted to assess predictors of quality of life, controlling for shift type, age, gender, marital status, satisfaction, fatigue, and unit assignment. Results: Nurses working 12-h shifts reported significantly higher levels of fatigue (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.82) but also reported higher quality of life (p < 0.001; d = 0.91) and greater satisfaction with their shift length (p=0.001; d = 0.72). No significant differences were found in turnover intention. Patient falls were more frequently reported among 12-h shift nurses, while other safety incidents showed no significant variation. A multiple regression model predicting QOL was significant (F(16, 83) = 9.64, p < 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.583). Satisfaction with shift was the strongest positive predictor (β = 0.432, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.117, 0.287]), while working a 12-h shift had a significant negative association with QOL (β = -0.232, p=0.004, 95% CI [-0.603, -0.117]). Marital status showed a marginally significant positive effect (β = 0.180, p=0.051, 95% CI [-0.001, 0.555]). Conclusion: Despite increased fatigue, nurses working 12-h shifts reported higher quality of life, possibly due to more days off and enhanced work-life balance. However, elevated fatigue and fall rates warrant caution. The findings underscore the importance of implementing flexible and individualized scheduling policies rather than universally adopting 12-h shifts. Further longitudinal studies are needed to explore long-term effects of shift length on nurse and patient outcomes.

检查轮班长度对护士疲劳,病人护理,生活质量和工作-生活动态在阿曼三级医院的影响:比较研究。
背景:采用12小时轮班以应对劳动力短缺,这对护士的福祉和患者护理质量的影响提出了问题。虽然国际研究提供了不同的结果,但对阿曼环境中的这些影响知之甚少。目的:比较8小时和12小时轮班对阿曼一家三级医院护士疲劳、生活质量、满意度、离职意向和感知患者护理的影响。方法:对苏丹卡布斯大学医院的100名护士进行横断面比较研究。采用描述性统计、t检验和卡方检验来比较不同移位类型的结果。在控制轮班类型、年龄、性别、婚姻状况、满意度、疲劳程度和单位分配的情况下,还进行了多元回归分析来评估生活质量的预测因子。结果:每班工作12小时的护士报告的疲劳水平显著较高(p < 0.001;Cohen’s d = 0.82),但也报告了更高的生活质量(p < 0.001;D = 0.91),对移位长度的满意度更高(p=0.001;d = 0.72)。离职倾向差异无统计学意义。在12小时轮班的护士中,病人摔倒的报告更频繁,而其他安全事件没有明显的变化。多元回归模型预测生活质量显著(F(16,83) = 9.64, p < 0.001,调整后r2 = 0.583)。轮班满意度是最强的正向预测因子(β = 0.432, p < 0.001, 95% CI[0.117, 0.287]),而轮班12小时与生活质量呈显著负相关(β = -0.232, p=0.004, 95% CI[-0.603, -0.117])。婚姻状况有显著的正影响(β = 0.180, p=0.051, 95% CI[-0.001, 0.555])。结论:尽管疲劳增加,但12小时轮班的护士报告了更高的生活质量,可能是由于更多的休息时间和工作与生活的平衡。然而,疲劳和跌倒率升高需要谨慎。研究结果强调了实施灵活和个性化的调度政策的重要性,而不是普遍采用12小时制。需要进一步的纵向研究来探索轮班长度对护士和患者预后的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信