Hayley E Cunningham, Dirk A Davis, Charles M Burns, Katherine Link, Sara LeGrand, Carly Kelley, Kathryn Whetten, Mehri S McKellar
{"title":"Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition: Perceptions among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals in North Carolina.","authors":"Hayley E Cunningham, Dirk A Davis, Charles M Burns, Katherine Link, Sara LeGrand, Carly Kelley, Kathryn Whetten, Mehri S McKellar","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be underprescribed preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but PrEP research on SGM communities other than transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men is limited. We sought to better understand SGM individuals' vulnerability to HIV acquisition and awareness and perceptions of PrEP in North Carolina, with a focus on SGM groups less often included in research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 37-item online survey to adult SGM participants, examining differences in perceived and behavioral HIV risk based on self-reported behaviors. We also compared PrEP awareness, prescriptions, and stigma between SGM identities and used logistic regression to examine associations between HIV risk and PrEP use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 372 participants completed the survey. Although 30.9% reported behaviors that increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition, only 9.5% perceived their risk as elevated. Most (78.5%) were aware of PrEP, but only 15.1% had been prescribed PrEP. PrEP stigma was most pervasive among cisgender women. Nonbinary and queer participants were more likely to have experienced mistreatment by a provider (20.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 19.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and avoid care fearing mistreatment (31.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 27.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with the entire sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP is prescribed at low rates across many SGM communities, with misperception of HIV risk, PrEP stigma, and mistreatment in health care identified as important barriers. Healthcare providers should take steps to create a safe environment for SGM patients and ask all patients about HIV risk factors and provide information about PrEP regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 7","pages":"357-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be underprescribed preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but PrEP research on SGM communities other than transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men is limited. We sought to better understand SGM individuals' vulnerability to HIV acquisition and awareness and perceptions of PrEP in North Carolina, with a focus on SGM groups less often included in research.
Methods: We administered a 37-item online survey to adult SGM participants, examining differences in perceived and behavioral HIV risk based on self-reported behaviors. We also compared PrEP awareness, prescriptions, and stigma between SGM identities and used logistic regression to examine associations between HIV risk and PrEP use.
Results: In total, 372 participants completed the survey. Although 30.9% reported behaviors that increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition, only 9.5% perceived their risk as elevated. Most (78.5%) were aware of PrEP, but only 15.1% had been prescribed PrEP. PrEP stigma was most pervasive among cisgender women. Nonbinary and queer participants were more likely to have experienced mistreatment by a provider (20.3%, P < 0.0001; 19.2%, P < 0.01) and avoid care fearing mistreatment (31.9%, P < 0.001; 27.7%; P < 0.001) compared with the entire sample.
Conclusions: PrEP is prescribed at low rates across many SGM communities, with misperception of HIV risk, PrEP stigma, and mistreatment in health care identified as important barriers. Healthcare providers should take steps to create a safe environment for SGM patients and ask all patients about HIV risk factors and provide information about PrEP regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.