Anna H Bailes, Gina P McKernan, Mark S Redfern, Rakié Cham, Carol M Greco, Jennifer S Brach, Sara R Piva, Nam Vo, Gwendolyn Sowa
{"title":"Associations Between Fear-Avoidance or Pain Catastrophizing and Gait Quality in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Anna H Bailes, Gina P McKernan, Mark S Redfern, Rakié Cham, Carol M Greco, Jennifer S Brach, Sara R Piva, Nam Vo, Gwendolyn Sowa","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with reduced gait speed and other gait quality impairments. Fear-avoidance and pain catastrophizing impact movement in cLBP, but their specific impact on gait quality is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine associations between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality in cLBP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study occurred at a university.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>There were 500 individuals (56.6 [SD = 16.5] years old.; 311 female) with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and 6-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6). Participants were divided into high and low fear-avoidance subgroups based on an established FABQ-PA cutoff (>14).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Gait speed was measured during a 4-meter walk test, while step time average, step time variability, and symmetry were derived from a lumbar inertial measurement unit worn during a 2-minute walk test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine relationships between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality. T tests were used to determine gait quality differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High fear-avoidance was associated with reduced gait speed (B = -0.0039), but pain catastrophizing was not. The high fear-avoidance subgroup had slower gait speed (mean difference = 0.05 m/s), longer step time (mean difference = 0.02 s), and higher step time variability (mean difference = 0.004 s) compared to the low fear-avoidance subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fear-avoidance is associated with slower gait speeds, even after adjusting for demographics, pain, and disability. The established FABQ-PA cutoff is robust in detecting gait differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>It may be important to consider fear-avoidance in the delivery of multi-modal interventions to address gait impairments. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of addressing fear-avoidance alongside traditional gait interventions in cLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with reduced gait speed and other gait quality impairments. Fear-avoidance and pain catastrophizing impact movement in cLBP, but their specific impact on gait quality is unknown.
Objective: This study aimed to determine associations between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality in cLBP.
Design: This was a cross-sectional study.
Setting: This study occurred at a university.
Participants: There were 500 individuals (56.6 [SD = 16.5] years old.; 311 female) with cLBP.
Interventions: Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and 6-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6). Participants were divided into high and low fear-avoidance subgroups based on an established FABQ-PA cutoff (>14).
Main outcomes and measures: Gait speed was measured during a 4-meter walk test, while step time average, step time variability, and symmetry were derived from a lumbar inertial measurement unit worn during a 2-minute walk test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine relationships between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality. T tests were used to determine gait quality differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.
Results: High fear-avoidance was associated with reduced gait speed (B = -0.0039), but pain catastrophizing was not. The high fear-avoidance subgroup had slower gait speed (mean difference = 0.05 m/s), longer step time (mean difference = 0.02 s), and higher step time variability (mean difference = 0.004 s) compared to the low fear-avoidance subgroup.
Conclusions: Fear-avoidance is associated with slower gait speeds, even after adjusting for demographics, pain, and disability. The established FABQ-PA cutoff is robust in detecting gait differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.
Relevance: It may be important to consider fear-avoidance in the delivery of multi-modal interventions to address gait impairments. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of addressing fear-avoidance alongside traditional gait interventions in cLBP.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.