Associations Between Fear-Avoidance or Pain Catastrophizing and Gait Quality in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Anna H Bailes, Gina P McKernan, Mark S Redfern, Rakié Cham, Carol M Greco, Jennifer S Brach, Sara R Piva, Nam Vo, Gwendolyn Sowa
{"title":"Associations Between Fear-Avoidance or Pain Catastrophizing and Gait Quality in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Anna H Bailes, Gina P McKernan, Mark S Redfern, Rakié Cham, Carol M Greco, Jennifer S Brach, Sara R Piva, Nam Vo, Gwendolyn Sowa","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with reduced gait speed and other gait quality impairments. Fear-avoidance and pain catastrophizing impact movement in cLBP, but their specific impact on gait quality is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine associations between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality in cLBP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study occurred at a university.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>There were 500 individuals (56.6 [SD = 16.5] years old.; 311 female) with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and 6-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6). Participants were divided into high and low fear-avoidance subgroups based on an established FABQ-PA cutoff (>14).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Gait speed was measured during a 4-meter walk test, while step time average, step time variability, and symmetry were derived from a lumbar inertial measurement unit worn during a 2-minute walk test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine relationships between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality. T tests were used to determine gait quality differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High fear-avoidance was associated with reduced gait speed (B = -0.0039), but pain catastrophizing was not. The high fear-avoidance subgroup had slower gait speed (mean difference = 0.05 m/s), longer step time (mean difference = 0.02 s), and higher step time variability (mean difference = 0.004 s) compared to the low fear-avoidance subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fear-avoidance is associated with slower gait speeds, even after adjusting for demographics, pain, and disability. The established FABQ-PA cutoff is robust in detecting gait differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>It may be important to consider fear-avoidance in the delivery of multi-modal interventions to address gait impairments. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of addressing fear-avoidance alongside traditional gait interventions in cLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with reduced gait speed and other gait quality impairments. Fear-avoidance and pain catastrophizing impact movement in cLBP, but their specific impact on gait quality is unknown.

Objective: This study aimed to determine associations between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality in cLBP.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study.

Setting: This study occurred at a university.

Participants: There were 500 individuals (56.6 [SD = 16.5] years old.; 311 female) with cLBP.

Interventions: Participants completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and 6-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-6). Participants were divided into high and low fear-avoidance subgroups based on an established FABQ-PA cutoff (>14).

Main outcomes and measures: Gait speed was measured during a 4-meter walk test, while step time average, step time variability, and symmetry were derived from a lumbar inertial measurement unit worn during a 2-minute walk test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine relationships between fear-avoidance or pain catastrophizing and gait quality. T tests were used to determine gait quality differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.

Results: High fear-avoidance was associated with reduced gait speed (B = -0.0039), but pain catastrophizing was not. The high fear-avoidance subgroup had slower gait speed (mean difference = 0.05 m/s), longer step time (mean difference = 0.02 s), and higher step time variability (mean difference = 0.004 s) compared to the low fear-avoidance subgroup.

Conclusions: Fear-avoidance is associated with slower gait speeds, even after adjusting for demographics, pain, and disability. The established FABQ-PA cutoff is robust in detecting gait differences between high versus low fear-avoidance subgroups.

Relevance: It may be important to consider fear-avoidance in the delivery of multi-modal interventions to address gait impairments. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of addressing fear-avoidance alongside traditional gait interventions in cLBP.

慢性腰痛患者的恐惧回避或疼痛突变与步态质量之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
重要性:慢性腰痛(cLBP)与步态速度减慢和其他步态质量损害有关。恐惧回避和疼痛灾难化影响cLBP患者的运动,但它们对步态质量的具体影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在确定cLBP中恐惧回避或疼痛灾难与步态质量之间的关系。设计:这是一项横断面研究。背景:本研究发生在一所大学。受试者:500人(56.6 [SD = 16.5]岁);311名女性)患有cLBP。干预措施:参与者完成了恐惧-回避信念问卷-身体活动(FABQ-PA)和6项疼痛灾难量表(PCS-6)。根据既定的FABQ-PA临界值(bbb14),参与者被分为高恐惧回避亚组和低恐惧回避亚组。主要结果和测量方法:在4米步行测试中测量步态速度,而在2分钟步行测试中佩戴的腰椎惯性测量单元获得了步时间平均值,步时间变异性和对称性。采用多元线性回归模型确定恐惧回避或疼痛灾变与步态质量之间的关系。使用T检验来确定高和低恐惧回避亚组之间的步态质量差异。结果:高恐惧回避与步态速度降低相关(B = -0.0039),但与疼痛灾难化无关。与低恐惧回避亚组相比,高恐惧回避亚组的步态速度较慢(平均差值0.05 m/s),步幅时间较长(平均差值0.02 s),步幅时间变异性较大(平均差值0.004 s)。结论:即使在调整了人口统计学、疼痛和残疾因素后,恐惧回避与较慢的步态速度有关。建立的FABQ-PA截止在检测高和低恐惧回避亚组之间的步态差异方面是鲁棒的。相关性:在提供多模式干预以解决步态障碍时,考虑恐惧避免可能是重要的。未来的研究需要确定解决恐惧回避和传统步态干预对cLBP的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信