Understanding Pain as Threat or Challenge: Predictive Roles of Resilience, Attachment, and Sensory Sensitivity.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf091
Aurianna M Lajaunie, Dennis Smythe, Guohao Zhu, John A Sturgeon, Jennifer Pierce
{"title":"Understanding Pain as Threat or Challenge: Predictive Roles of Resilience, Attachment, and Sensory Sensitivity.","authors":"Aurianna M Lajaunie, Dennis Smythe, Guohao Zhu, John A Sturgeon, Jennifer Pierce","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appraisals of pain as threatening or as a challenge are important for chronic pain patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the role of psychosocial factors (attachment, resilience, and self-esteem), as well as pain characteristics (pain intensity and generalized sensory sensitivity) in shaping pain appraisals among individuals with chronic pain from a single medical center in the Midwestern United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 278 participants from Michigan Medicine who reported chronic pain. Participants completed measures assessing psychosocial factors (attachment orientation, resilience, self-esteem), pain characteristics (pain intensity, generalized sensory sensitivity), and pain appraisals (threat and challenge). Gamma regression models were used to analyze the predictors of threat and challenge appraisals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher pain intensity (β  =  1.11, p < 0.001), generalized sensory sensitivity (β  =  1.03, p = 0.005), anxious attachment (β  =  1.04, p = 0.002), and lower resilience (β  =  0.99, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher threat appraisals. Challenge appraisals were seldom endorsed and were significantly associated with higher resilience (β  =  1.02, p = 0.001) and pain intensity (β  =  1.05, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pain characteristics, anxious attachment, and resilience were associated with pain appraisals. Identifying the potential antecedents of pain appraisals will provide a more comprehensive view of this important cognitive process linked to quality of life among individuals with chronic pain. Additionally, it may guide clinicians in identifying and applying appropriate pain interventions that best fit clients' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Appraisals of pain as threatening or as a challenge are important for chronic pain patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the role of psychosocial factors (attachment, resilience, and self-esteem), as well as pain characteristics (pain intensity and generalized sensory sensitivity) in shaping pain appraisals among individuals with chronic pain from a single medical center in the Midwestern United States.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 278 participants from Michigan Medicine who reported chronic pain. Participants completed measures assessing psychosocial factors (attachment orientation, resilience, self-esteem), pain characteristics (pain intensity, generalized sensory sensitivity), and pain appraisals (threat and challenge). Gamma regression models were used to analyze the predictors of threat and challenge appraisals.

Results: Higher pain intensity (β  =  1.11, p < 0.001), generalized sensory sensitivity (β  =  1.03, p = 0.005), anxious attachment (β  =  1.04, p = 0.002), and lower resilience (β  =  0.99, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher threat appraisals. Challenge appraisals were seldom endorsed and were significantly associated with higher resilience (β  =  1.02, p = 0.001) and pain intensity (β  =  1.05, p = 0.003).

Discussion: Pain characteristics, anxious attachment, and resilience were associated with pain appraisals. Identifying the potential antecedents of pain appraisals will provide a more comprehensive view of this important cognitive process linked to quality of life among individuals with chronic pain. Additionally, it may guide clinicians in identifying and applying appropriate pain interventions that best fit clients' needs.

理解疼痛是威胁还是挑战:弹性、依恋和感觉敏感性的预测作用。
将疼痛评估为威胁或挑战对慢性疼痛患者的生活质量很重要。本研究的目的是研究心理社会因素(依恋、恢复力和自尊)以及疼痛特征(疼痛强度和广义感觉敏感性)在塑造美国中西部单一医疗中心慢性疼痛患者疼痛评估中的作用。方法:对来自密歇根医学院的278名慢性疼痛患者进行横断面调查研究。参与者完成了评估心理社会因素(依恋取向、恢复力、自尊)、疼痛特征(疼痛强度、广义感觉敏感性)和疼痛评估(威胁和挑战)的测量。采用伽玛回归模型分析威胁和挑战评价的预测因子。结果:较高的疼痛强度(β = 1.11, p)。讨论:疼痛特征、焦虑依恋和恢复力与疼痛评估相关。识别疼痛评估的潜在前因将提供一个更全面的观点,这一重要的认知过程与慢性疼痛患者的生活质量有关。此外,它可以指导临床医生识别和应用适当的疼痛干预,最适合客户的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信