Marwan Shawki, Thalys S Rodrigues, Hussein Al-Fiadh, Karen Sanders, Ali H Al-Fiadh
{"title":"Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic: An Australian Virtual Care Experience.","authors":"Marwan Shawki, Thalys S Rodrigues, Hussein Al-Fiadh, Karen Sanders, Ali H Al-Fiadh","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low to intermediate-risk chest pain patients, reducing hospitalisation and healthcare costs. However, there is limited data on the virtual model of care for RACPAC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to evaluate the structure, cost-effectiveness, and imaging modalities performance of face-to-face and virtual RACPAC in an Australian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients attending the RACPAC within a large Australian quaternary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We described the clinic parameters and imaging modality utilisation with parametric and non-parametric descriptive statics. Patterns of diagnostic modality utilisation were assessed with logistic regression. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3976 consecutive patients attended RACPAC, with a mean age of 55.2 years (±11.6), and 48.7 % were females. RACPAC transitioned to Virtual service during the COVID-19 pandemic, witnessing the highest attendance rate at 95 %, despite increased patient load by 10.7 %, with a lower re-presentation rate of 1.5 % compared to 2.8 % pre-pandemic (p < 0.01). The revascularisation rates were 34.6 % after positive CT coronary angiogram, 26.7 % for Treadmill Stress Echocardiogram, 20 % for Myocardial Perfusion Scan, and 33.3 % for Invasive Angiogram. The cost-effective analysis of virtual care reduced evaluation costs to one-fourth, with 460 days of in-hospital stays and AUD 283,663 of cost saved annually.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of virtual RACPAC, emphasising its potential to extend RACPAC services to remote areas or limited-resource countries. It underscores CTCA's utility as a diagnostic tool in the RACPAC setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"37 3","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low to intermediate-risk chest pain patients, reducing hospitalisation and healthcare costs. However, there is limited data on the virtual model of care for RACPAC.
Aim: We sought to evaluate the structure, cost-effectiveness, and imaging modalities performance of face-to-face and virtual RACPAC in an Australian setting.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending the RACPAC within a large Australian quaternary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We described the clinic parameters and imaging modality utilisation with parametric and non-parametric descriptive statics. Patterns of diagnostic modality utilisation were assessed with logistic regression. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: 3976 consecutive patients attended RACPAC, with a mean age of 55.2 years (±11.6), and 48.7 % were females. RACPAC transitioned to Virtual service during the COVID-19 pandemic, witnessing the highest attendance rate at 95 %, despite increased patient load by 10.7 %, with a lower re-presentation rate of 1.5 % compared to 2.8 % pre-pandemic (p < 0.01). The revascularisation rates were 34.6 % after positive CT coronary angiogram, 26.7 % for Treadmill Stress Echocardiogram, 20 % for Myocardial Perfusion Scan, and 33.3 % for Invasive Angiogram. The cost-effective analysis of virtual care reduced evaluation costs to one-fourth, with 460 days of in-hospital stays and AUD 283,663 of cost saved annually.
Conclusion: This study highlights the feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of virtual RACPAC, emphasising its potential to extend RACPAC services to remote areas or limited-resource countries. It underscores CTCA's utility as a diagnostic tool in the RACPAC setting.