Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic: An Australian Virtual Care Experience.

IF 1.3 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1442
Marwan Shawki, Thalys S Rodrigues, Hussein Al-Fiadh, Karen Sanders, Ali H Al-Fiadh
{"title":"Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic: An Australian Virtual Care Experience.","authors":"Marwan Shawki, Thalys S Rodrigues, Hussein Al-Fiadh, Karen Sanders, Ali H Al-Fiadh","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low to intermediate-risk chest pain patients, reducing hospitalisation and healthcare costs. However, there is limited data on the virtual model of care for RACPAC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to evaluate the structure, cost-effectiveness, and imaging modalities performance of face-to-face and virtual RACPAC in an Australian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients attending the RACPAC within a large Australian quaternary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We described the clinic parameters and imaging modality utilisation with parametric and non-parametric descriptive statics. Patterns of diagnostic modality utilisation were assessed with logistic regression. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3976 consecutive patients attended RACPAC, with a mean age of 55.2 years (±11.6), and 48.7 % were females. RACPAC transitioned to Virtual service during the COVID-19 pandemic, witnessing the highest attendance rate at 95 %, despite increased patient load by 10.7 %, with a lower re-presentation rate of 1.5 % compared to 2.8 % pre-pandemic (p < 0.01). The revascularisation rates were 34.6 % after positive CT coronary angiogram, 26.7 % for Treadmill Stress Echocardiogram, 20 % for Myocardial Perfusion Scan, and 33.3 % for Invasive Angiogram. The cost-effective analysis of virtual care reduced evaluation costs to one-fourth, with 460 days of in-hospital stays and AUD 283,663 of cost saved annually.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of virtual RACPAC, emphasising its potential to extend RACPAC services to remote areas or limited-resource countries. It underscores CTCA's utility as a diagnostic tool in the RACPAC setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"37 3","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low to intermediate-risk chest pain patients, reducing hospitalisation and healthcare costs. However, there is limited data on the virtual model of care for RACPAC.

Aim: We sought to evaluate the structure, cost-effectiveness, and imaging modalities performance of face-to-face and virtual RACPAC in an Australian setting.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending the RACPAC within a large Australian quaternary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We described the clinic parameters and imaging modality utilisation with parametric and non-parametric descriptive statics. Patterns of diagnostic modality utilisation were assessed with logistic regression. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: 3976 consecutive patients attended RACPAC, with a mean age of 55.2 years (±11.6), and 48.7 % were females. RACPAC transitioned to Virtual service during the COVID-19 pandemic, witnessing the highest attendance rate at 95 %, despite increased patient load by 10.7 %, with a lower re-presentation rate of 1.5 % compared to 2.8 % pre-pandemic (p < 0.01). The revascularisation rates were 34.6 % after positive CT coronary angiogram, 26.7 % for Treadmill Stress Echocardiogram, 20 % for Myocardial Perfusion Scan, and 33.3 % for Invasive Angiogram. The cost-effective analysis of virtual care reduced evaluation costs to one-fourth, with 460 days of in-hospital stays and AUD 283,663 of cost saved annually.

Conclusion: This study highlights the feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of virtual RACPAC, emphasising its potential to extend RACPAC services to remote areas or limited-resource countries. It underscores CTCA's utility as a diagnostic tool in the RACPAC setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

快速访问胸痛评估诊所:澳大利亚虚拟护理经验。
背景:快速胸痛评估诊所(RACPAC)简化了低至中危胸痛患者的评估,减少了住院和医疗费用。然而,关于RACPAC的虚拟护理模型的数据有限。目的:我们试图在澳大利亚评估面对面和虚拟RACPAC的结构、成本效益和成像方式的性能。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2021年在澳大利亚一家大型第四医院RACPAC就诊的患者。我们描述了临床参数和成像模式利用参数和非参数描述性静态。使用逻辑回归评估诊断模式的使用模式。p值结果:连续3976例患者参加了RACPAC,平均年龄为55.2岁(±11.6),其中48.7%为女性。在COVID-19大流行期间,RACPAC过渡到虚拟服务,尽管患者负荷增加了10.7%,但最高的出勤率为95%,与大流行前的2.8%相比,重新就诊率为1.5% (p < 0.01)。CT冠脉造影阳性血运重建率为34.6%,跑步机负荷超声心动图阳性血运重建率为26.7%,心肌灌注扫描阳性血运重建率为20%,有创血管造影阳性血运重建率为33.3%。虚拟护理的成本效益分析将评估成本降低到四分之一,每年节省住院时间460天,节省成本283,663澳元。结论:本研究强调了虚拟的RACPAC的可行性、成本效益和可接受性,强调了将RACPAC服务扩展到偏远地区或资源有限的国家的潜力。它强调了CTCA作为RACPAC设置中的诊断工具的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信