Confidence, Competence and Cadavers: Improving the Self-Perception of Practice through Practical Teaching.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jill R D MacKay, Kirsty Hughes, John Ryan, Kelly L Bowlt Blacklock
{"title":"Confidence, Competence and Cadavers: Improving the Self-Perception of Practice through Practical Teaching.","authors":"Jill R D MacKay, Kirsty Hughes, John Ryan, Kelly L Bowlt Blacklock","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practical sessions using cadavers are one method of teaching clinical skills <i>en masse</i> to veterinary students, supporting students to learn the skills and gain the confidence to become Day One competent veterinarians. As confidence and competence are often conflated in Competency-Based Education approaches, in this study we used a pre-post survey design to evaluate 67 student self-ratings of confidence and self-assessed competence to explore whether a cadaver practical can change student confidence and self-assessed competence, and how comparable confidence and self-assessed competence are as measures. In a linear mixed effects model, we found that the practical improved the overall confidence score by 0.44 points (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.22, 0.66], <i>t</i><sub>(120)</sub> = 3.97, <i>p</i> < .001). Self-assessed competence also increased by 0.60 (95% CI [0.41, 0.79], <i>t</i><sub>(118)</sub> = 6.21, <i>p</i> < .001). However, although female students saw their overall self-assessed competence increase, they showed lower self-assessed competence scores by 0.87 points than males (95% CI [-1.47, -0.28], <i>t</i><sub>(118)</sub> = -2.89, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Despite confidence and self-assessed competence being strongly associated, direct agreement between the measures in a weighted kappa test was weak (pre-practical κ<sub>weighted</sub> = 0.49, [95% CI 0.33, 0.66], post-practical κ<sub>weighted</sub> = 0.44, [95% CI 0.10, 0.28]). We discuss the implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20240112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practical sessions using cadavers are one method of teaching clinical skills en masse to veterinary students, supporting students to learn the skills and gain the confidence to become Day One competent veterinarians. As confidence and competence are often conflated in Competency-Based Education approaches, in this study we used a pre-post survey design to evaluate 67 student self-ratings of confidence and self-assessed competence to explore whether a cadaver practical can change student confidence and self-assessed competence, and how comparable confidence and self-assessed competence are as measures. In a linear mixed effects model, we found that the practical improved the overall confidence score by 0.44 points (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.22, 0.66], t(120) = 3.97, p < .001). Self-assessed competence also increased by 0.60 (95% CI [0.41, 0.79], t(118) = 6.21, p < .001). However, although female students saw their overall self-assessed competence increase, they showed lower self-assessed competence scores by 0.87 points than males (95% CI [-1.47, -0.28], t(118) = -2.89, p = 0.005). Despite confidence and self-assessed competence being strongly associated, direct agreement between the measures in a weighted kappa test was weak (pre-practical κweighted = 0.49, [95% CI 0.33, 0.66], post-practical κweighted = 0.44, [95% CI 0.10, 0.28]). We discuss the implications of these findings.

自信、能力与尸体:通过实践教学提高实践自我认知。
以尸体为教学对象的临床实践课程是向兽医学生讲授临床技能的一种方法,帮助学生学习技能,获得成为第一天合格兽医的信心。在能力本位教育方法中,自信和能力常常被混淆,因此本研究采用前后调查设计,对67名学生的自信和自我评估能力进行评估,以探讨尸体实践是否会改变学生的自信和自我评估能力,以及自信和自我评估能力作为衡量标准的可比性。在线性混合效应模型中,我们发现实用方法使总体置信度得分提高了0.44点(95%置信区间[CI] [0.22, 0.66], t(120) = 3.97, p < .001)。自我评估能力也提高了0.60 (95% CI [0.41, 0.79], t(118) = 6.21, p < .001)。然而,尽管女生的整体自评能力有所提高,但自评能力得分比男生低0.87分(95% CI [-1.47, -0.28], t(118) = -2.89, p = 0.005)。尽管自信和自我评估能力强相关,但加权卡帕检验中测量结果之间的直接一致性较弱(实用前κ加权= 0.49,[95% CI 0.33, 0.66],实用后κ加权= 0.44,[95% CI 0.10, 0.28])。我们将讨论这些发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信