Durgesh Wankhede, Niels Halama, Matthias Kloor, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister
{"title":"Diabetes and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Survival According to Tumor Immunity Status.","authors":"Durgesh Wankhede, Niels Halama, Matthias Kloor, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and poorer survival outcomes. However, the role of tumor immune status in influencing these relationships remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based matched case-control study (n = 4,724) with prospective long-term follow-up of CRC cases (n = 2,321; median follow-up, 9.5 years). Tumor immune status was assessed using an immune cell score (ICS), derived from CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell densities measured at the invasive margin and tumor core of resected specimens. ICS was stratified into high (ICS<sup>Hi</sup>), intermediate (ICS<sup>Int</sup>), and low (ICS<sup>Low</sup>) immune infiltration on the basis of standard cutoffs (25% and 70%). Multivariable logistic regression estimated CRC risk, whereas time-dependent Cox regression evaluated survival outcomes. Primary end points included CRC-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between T2D and CRC risk differed significantly by ICS (<i>P</i> for heterogeneity = .02). T2D was associated with an increased risk of CRC (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.66]), particularly for ICS<sup>Low</sup> (OR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.35 to 2.39]) and ICS<sup>Int</sup> subtypes (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.66]), but not for ICS<sup>Hi</sup> CRC subtype (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.52]). Patients with T2D with ICS<sup>Low</sup> tumors showed poorer CRC-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.30 to 3.05]) and DFS (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.26]) than those without T2D, but not for ICS<sup>Int</sup> and ICS<sup>Hi</sup> CRC subtypes. Patients with T2D showed inferior overall and non-cancer-related survival regardless of immune subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>T2D disproportionately affects CRC risk and survival in tumors with low immune infiltration, suggesting a continuum of T2D's impact from tumorigenesis to prognosis, through systemic and tumor-specific immune modulation. These findings highlight the need for precision prevention strategies integrating metabolic and immune-based interventions to mitigate CRC burden in patients with T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2500148"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and poorer survival outcomes. However, the role of tumor immune status in influencing these relationships remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a population-based matched case-control study (n = 4,724) with prospective long-term follow-up of CRC cases (n = 2,321; median follow-up, 9.5 years). Tumor immune status was assessed using an immune cell score (ICS), derived from CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities measured at the invasive margin and tumor core of resected specimens. ICS was stratified into high (ICSHi), intermediate (ICSInt), and low (ICSLow) immune infiltration on the basis of standard cutoffs (25% and 70%). Multivariable logistic regression estimated CRC risk, whereas time-dependent Cox regression evaluated survival outcomes. Primary end points included CRC-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS).
Results: The association between T2D and CRC risk differed significantly by ICS (P for heterogeneity = .02). T2D was associated with an increased risk of CRC (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.66]), particularly for ICSLow (OR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.35 to 2.39]) and ICSInt subtypes (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.66]), but not for ICSHi CRC subtype (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.52]). Patients with T2D with ICSLow tumors showed poorer CRC-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.30 to 3.05]) and DFS (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.26]) than those without T2D, but not for ICSInt and ICSHi CRC subtypes. Patients with T2D showed inferior overall and non-cancer-related survival regardless of immune subtypes.
Conclusion: T2D disproportionately affects CRC risk and survival in tumors with low immune infiltration, suggesting a continuum of T2D's impact from tumorigenesis to prognosis, through systemic and tumor-specific immune modulation. These findings highlight the need for precision prevention strategies integrating metabolic and immune-based interventions to mitigate CRC burden in patients with T2D.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.