Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes After Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: The Impact of Preoperative Modic Changes.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kota Watanabe, Takeshi Fujii, Takehiro Michikawa, Takahito Iga, Toshiki Okubo, Kazuki Takeda, Satoshi Suzuki, Masahiro Ozaki, Osahiko Tsuji, Narihiro Nagoshi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura
{"title":"Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes After Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: The Impact of Preoperative Modic Changes.","authors":"Kota Watanabe, Takeshi Fujii, Takehiro Michikawa, Takahito Iga, Toshiki Okubo, Kazuki Takeda, Satoshi Suzuki, Masahiro Ozaki, Osahiko Tsuji, Narihiro Nagoshi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/21925682251361034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveModic changes (MCs) have been associated with low back pain; however, their prognostic value in surgical outcomes-particularly in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with decompression alone-remains unclear. Few studies have investigated the progression and long-term clinical impact of MCs. This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year progression of MCs and their association with clinical outcomes following posterior decompression surgery for LSS.MethodsThis study included 62 patients who underwent posterior decompression for LSS and completed a 10-year follow-up with MRI and clinical assessments. MCs and disc degeneration were evaluated using standardized MRI criteria. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rates were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up. Outcomes were compared between Modic-negative patients and those with preoperative Modic Type 1 or Type 2 changes. Analysis of covariance adjusted for confounding variables.ResultsThe prevalence of MCs increased from 37.1% preoperatively to 74.2% at 10 years. Type 1 changes were dynamic, often progressing to Type 2 or 3. Type 2 changes were more stable and associated with significantly lower postoperative JOA scores and recovery rates compared to Modic-negative or Type 1 patients (<i>P</i> < 0.05), after adjustment for age, sex, sagittal alignment parameters, and disc degeneration. Type 2 MCs were also linked with minimal improvement in back pain.ConclusionModic changes, particularly Type 2, are associated with inferior long-term outcomes. These findings suggest that Modic Type 2 may serve as a prognostic marker of advanced degeneration and may be associated with reduced recovery following decompression surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251361034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251361034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveModic changes (MCs) have been associated with low back pain; however, their prognostic value in surgical outcomes-particularly in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with decompression alone-remains unclear. Few studies have investigated the progression and long-term clinical impact of MCs. This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year progression of MCs and their association with clinical outcomes following posterior decompression surgery for LSS.MethodsThis study included 62 patients who underwent posterior decompression for LSS and completed a 10-year follow-up with MRI and clinical assessments. MCs and disc degeneration were evaluated using standardized MRI criteria. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rates were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up. Outcomes were compared between Modic-negative patients and those with preoperative Modic Type 1 or Type 2 changes. Analysis of covariance adjusted for confounding variables.ResultsThe prevalence of MCs increased from 37.1% preoperatively to 74.2% at 10 years. Type 1 changes were dynamic, often progressing to Type 2 or 3. Type 2 changes were more stable and associated with significantly lower postoperative JOA scores and recovery rates compared to Modic-negative or Type 1 patients (P < 0.05), after adjustment for age, sex, sagittal alignment parameters, and disc degeneration. Type 2 MCs were also linked with minimal improvement in back pain.ConclusionModic changes, particularly Type 2, are associated with inferior long-term outcomes. These findings suggest that Modic Type 2 may serve as a prognostic marker of advanced degeneration and may be associated with reduced recovery following decompression surgery.

腰椎管狭窄减压手术后10年临床结果:术前改变的影响。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的emodic改变(MCs)与腰痛相关;然而,它们在手术结果中的预后价值,特别是在腰椎管狭窄(LSS)患者单独接受减压治疗时,仍不清楚。很少有研究调查MCs的进展和长期临床影响。本研究旨在评估LSS后路减压手术后MCs的10年进展及其与临床结果的关系。方法本研究纳入62例行后路减压治疗LSS的患者,并完成了10年的MRI随访和临床评估。使用标准化的MRI标准评估MCs和椎间盘退变。术前和随访时分别评估日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和康复率。比较Modic阴性患者和术前Modic 1型或2型改变患者的结果。校正混杂变量的协方差分析。结果MCs患病率由术前的37.1%上升至10年时的74.2%。1型变化是动态的,经常进展到2型或3型。在调整年龄、性别、矢状面排列参数和椎间盘退变后,与modic阴性或1型患者相比,2型变化更稳定,术后JOA评分和恢复率显著降低(P < 0.05)。2型MCs也与背部疼痛的轻微改善有关。结论改进性改变,尤其是2型,与较差的长期预后相关。这些发现提示Modic 2型可作为晚期退变的预后标志,并可能与减压手术后恢复减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信