Research Progress of Biomarkers for Sepsis and Precision Medicine.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/4585495
Neng Wang, Hansheng Huang, Youlin Tan, Nai Zhang
{"title":"Research Progress of Biomarkers for Sepsis and Precision Medicine.","authors":"Neng Wang, Hansheng Huang, Youlin Tan, Nai Zhang","doi":"10.1155/emmi/4585495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1989, the definition of sepsis has been revised several times. The 2016 Sepsis-3 consensus definition of sepsis aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the frequency of misdiagnosis. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system facilitates personalized treatment. Sepsis-related biomarkers are essential for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis; however, their widespread application is limited by their insufficient sensitivity and specificity. From October 2019 to October 2024, 4801 studies had reported on sepsis-related biomarkers. The number of studies initially increased but subsequently decreased over time (beginning from 2021). C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are the most frequently investigated biomarkers, and their combination with other biomarkers can improve diagnostic accuracy. Advancements in data-driven technologies have helped optimize the definition of sepsis, accelerate early diagnosis, clarify subphenotypes, improve prognostic assessment, and develop personalized treatment strategies. With the deepening of research on the pathological mechanisms of sepsis, novel biomarkers such as vascular endothelin, vasoactive peptides, BMP9, cytokines, chemokines, and cfDNA have emerged, which are closely related to the severity of the disease. The clinical application of known biomarkers has expanded, and their kinetic changes are considered more accurate than a single value in predicting outcomes. In addition, related studies have focused on the exploration of precision medicine for sepsis. Efforts have been made to divide patients into more homogeneous subgroups by distinguishing their shared biological characteristics, thus providing valuable avenues for developing novel therapeutic approaches. This article reviews the research status of some commonly used sepsis biomarkers from October 2019 to October 2024, analyzes the current application status and limitations, pays attention to the changes of biomarkers and the exploration of precision medicine for sepsis, and aims to develop new treatment approaches by dividing patients into subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4585495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/4585495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1989, the definition of sepsis has been revised several times. The 2016 Sepsis-3 consensus definition of sepsis aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the frequency of misdiagnosis. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system facilitates personalized treatment. Sepsis-related biomarkers are essential for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis; however, their widespread application is limited by their insufficient sensitivity and specificity. From October 2019 to October 2024, 4801 studies had reported on sepsis-related biomarkers. The number of studies initially increased but subsequently decreased over time (beginning from 2021). C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are the most frequently investigated biomarkers, and their combination with other biomarkers can improve diagnostic accuracy. Advancements in data-driven technologies have helped optimize the definition of sepsis, accelerate early diagnosis, clarify subphenotypes, improve prognostic assessment, and develop personalized treatment strategies. With the deepening of research on the pathological mechanisms of sepsis, novel biomarkers such as vascular endothelin, vasoactive peptides, BMP9, cytokines, chemokines, and cfDNA have emerged, which are closely related to the severity of the disease. The clinical application of known biomarkers has expanded, and their kinetic changes are considered more accurate than a single value in predicting outcomes. In addition, related studies have focused on the exploration of precision medicine for sepsis. Efforts have been made to divide patients into more homogeneous subgroups by distinguishing their shared biological characteristics, thus providing valuable avenues for developing novel therapeutic approaches. This article reviews the research status of some commonly used sepsis biomarkers from October 2019 to October 2024, analyzes the current application status and limitations, pays attention to the changes of biomarkers and the exploration of precision medicine for sepsis, and aims to develop new treatment approaches by dividing patients into subgroups.

脓毒症生物标志物与精准医学研究进展
自1989年以来,脓毒症的定义已被多次修订。2016年脓毒症-3共识定义脓毒症旨在提高诊断准确性,减少误诊频率。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分系统有助于个性化治疗。败血症相关生物标志物对诊断、治疗和预后至关重要;然而,由于其敏感性和特异性不足,限制了其广泛应用。从2019年10月到2024年10月,有4801项研究报道了败血症相关的生物标志物。研究的数量最初增加,但随后随着时间的推移而减少(从2021年开始)。c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)是最常被研究的生物标志物,它们与其他生物标志物的结合可以提高诊断的准确性。数据驱动技术的进步有助于优化败血症的定义,加速早期诊断,澄清亚表型,改善预后评估,并制定个性化的治疗策略。随着对脓毒症病理机制研究的不断深入,血管内皮素、血管活性肽、BMP9、细胞因子、趋化因子、cfDNA等新型生物标志物不断涌现,与脓毒症的严重程度密切相关。已知生物标志物的临床应用已经扩大,它们的动力学变化被认为比预测结果的单一值更准确。此外,相关研究也集中在败血症的精准医学探索上。通过区分患者共同的生物学特征,将患者划分为更均匀的亚组,从而为开发新的治疗方法提供了有价值的途径。本文综述了2019年10月至2024年10月部分常用脓毒症生物标志物的研究现状,分析了目前的应用现状及局限性,关注生物标志物的变化及脓毒症精准医学的探索,旨在通过对患者进行亚群划分,开拓新的治疗途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信