Sensory evaluation of plant-based cheese: a systematic review with a focus on texture and mouthfeel.

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Christina J Birke Rune, Mathias Porsmose Clausen, Davide Giacalone
{"title":"Sensory evaluation of plant-based cheese: a systematic review with a focus on texture and mouthfeel.","authors":"Christina J Birke Rune, Mathias Porsmose Clausen, Davide Giacalone","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2025.2531220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer interest in plant-based cheese is rising due to environmental, animal welfare, and health concerns, but texture remains a major challenge in replicating the creaminess, smoothness, and meltability of dairy cheese. The absence of casein in plant-based cheese often results in brittle or gummy textures, whereas plant-based fats and proteins often lead to phase separation and weak cohesion, thereby affecting sensory quality. While instrumental texture analysis is common in the lietarature, many studies lack a correlation between instrumental measures, sensory perception and consumer acceptance, limiting practical relevance. Against this background, this review systematically examined 85 sensory studies on plant-based cheese focusing on texture modification, sensory evaluation, and consumer response. Second, the review assessed the standardization of texture and mouthfeel terminology. Only four studies provided clear definitions of texture attributes, underscoring the need for greater standardization across studies. Third, it evaluated the quality of sensory and consumer analyses within these studies. A total of 60% of the studies (51 out of 85) had methodological issues, including small sample sizes and poorly reported sensory evaluation methods, highlighting key gaps in sensory studies on plant-based cheese. Future studies must refine sensory and consumer evaluation techniques to better replicate the dairy-like texture and mouthfeel in order and meet consumer expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10767,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2025.2531220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer interest in plant-based cheese is rising due to environmental, animal welfare, and health concerns, but texture remains a major challenge in replicating the creaminess, smoothness, and meltability of dairy cheese. The absence of casein in plant-based cheese often results in brittle or gummy textures, whereas plant-based fats and proteins often lead to phase separation and weak cohesion, thereby affecting sensory quality. While instrumental texture analysis is common in the lietarature, many studies lack a correlation between instrumental measures, sensory perception and consumer acceptance, limiting practical relevance. Against this background, this review systematically examined 85 sensory studies on plant-based cheese focusing on texture modification, sensory evaluation, and consumer response. Second, the review assessed the standardization of texture and mouthfeel terminology. Only four studies provided clear definitions of texture attributes, underscoring the need for greater standardization across studies. Third, it evaluated the quality of sensory and consumer analyses within these studies. A total of 60% of the studies (51 out of 85) had methodological issues, including small sample sizes and poorly reported sensory evaluation methods, highlighting key gaps in sensory studies on plant-based cheese. Future studies must refine sensory and consumer evaluation techniques to better replicate the dairy-like texture and mouthfeel in order and meet consumer expectations.

植物奶酪的感官评价:一个系统的回顾,重点是质地和口感。
由于环境、动物福利和健康方面的考虑,消费者对植物奶酪的兴趣正在上升,但质地仍然是复制乳制品奶酪的奶油、光滑和可溶性的主要挑战。植物奶酪中缺乏酪蛋白通常会导致脆或粘稠的质地,而植物脂肪和蛋白质通常会导致相分离和凝聚力弱,从而影响感官质量。虽然仪器质地分析在文献中很常见,但许多研究缺乏仪器测量,感官知觉和消费者接受度之间的相关性,限制了实际相关性。在此背景下,本综述系统地检查了85项关于植物奶酪的感官研究,重点是质地修饰,感官评价和消费者反应。其次,综述评估了质地和口感术语的标准化。只有四项研究提供了纹理属性的明确定义,强调了在研究中进行更大标准化的必要性。第三,它评估了这些研究中感官和消费者分析的质量。总共有60%的研究(85项中的51项)存在方法学问题,包括样本量小和报告不佳的感官评估方法,突出了植物性奶酪感官研究的关键空白。未来的研究必须完善感官和消费者评价技术,以更好地复制乳制品般的质地和口感,以满足消费者的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
600
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition serves as an authoritative outlet for critical perspectives on contemporary technology, food science, and human nutrition. With a specific focus on issues of national significance, particularly for food scientists, nutritionists, and health professionals, the journal delves into nutrition, functional foods, food safety, and food science and technology. Research areas span diverse topics such as diet and disease, antioxidants, allergenicity, microbiological concerns, flavor chemistry, nutrient roles and bioavailability, pesticides, toxic chemicals and regulation, risk assessment, food safety, and emerging food products, ingredients, and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信