Validating the Data Completeness and Accuracy of the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/carj/8893074
Ranjani Somayaji, Stephanie Y Cheng, Noma Abdulrahem, Sanja Stanojevic, Paul Eckford, Bradley S Quon, Elizabeth Cromwell, Albert Faro, Christopher H Goss, Anne L Stephenson
{"title":"Validating the Data Completeness and Accuracy of the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.","authors":"Ranjani Somayaji, Stephanie Y Cheng, Noma Abdulrahem, Sanja Stanojevic, Paul Eckford, Bradley S Quon, Elizabeth Cromwell, Albert Faro, Christopher H Goss, Anne L Stephenson","doi":"10.1155/carj/8893074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry (CCFR) was developed in the 1970s and has longitudinal demographic and clinical data on persons living with cystic fibrosis (CF) attending accredited clinics in Canada. We aimed to validate the data collection and identify potential limitations of the CCFR. <b>Methods:</b> Of 40 accredited CF clinics in Canada invited and based on an a priori sample size calculation, eight clinics were included. 15% of each CF clinic's population in 2019 were randomly selected. Data variables were selected based on their importance to care, epidemiologic trends, and data related to demography, clinic visits, and hospitalizations. The accuracy of the registry data was compared to the medical records as the gold standard. Each data element was categorized as correct, incorrect, or not able to be validated. The accuracy rate was calculated as the percent correct out of all records validated. <b>Results:</b> A total of 4382 individuals had data entered into the CCFR in 2019. The validation cohort consisted of 208 individuals from 8 clinics, which were representative across location, size of clinic (small/medium/large), and type of clinic (adult, pediatric, and combined). The 208 individuals were 52% male and 95% White, and with a median age of 26.3 years (IQR: 15.2-36.6). Approximately 95% of CCFR data on clinical measurements, infections, treatments, and hospitalizations validated were accurate as compared to the medical record. For demography, sex and date of birth had 100% accuracy. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our validation of the CCFR demonstrated high accuracy for clinical and demographic variables used in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8893074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/carj/8893074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry (CCFR) was developed in the 1970s and has longitudinal demographic and clinical data on persons living with cystic fibrosis (CF) attending accredited clinics in Canada. We aimed to validate the data collection and identify potential limitations of the CCFR. Methods: Of 40 accredited CF clinics in Canada invited and based on an a priori sample size calculation, eight clinics were included. 15% of each CF clinic's population in 2019 were randomly selected. Data variables were selected based on their importance to care, epidemiologic trends, and data related to demography, clinic visits, and hospitalizations. The accuracy of the registry data was compared to the medical records as the gold standard. Each data element was categorized as correct, incorrect, or not able to be validated. The accuracy rate was calculated as the percent correct out of all records validated. Results: A total of 4382 individuals had data entered into the CCFR in 2019. The validation cohort consisted of 208 individuals from 8 clinics, which were representative across location, size of clinic (small/medium/large), and type of clinic (adult, pediatric, and combined). The 208 individuals were 52% male and 95% White, and with a median age of 26.3 years (IQR: 15.2-36.6). Approximately 95% of CCFR data on clinical measurements, infections, treatments, and hospitalizations validated were accurate as compared to the medical record. For demography, sex and date of birth had 100% accuracy. Conclusion: Our validation of the CCFR demonstrated high accuracy for clinical and demographic variables used in clinical research.

验证加拿大囊性纤维化登记数据的完整性和准确性。
加拿大囊性纤维化登记处(CCFR)建立于20世纪70年代,拥有在加拿大认可的诊所就诊的囊性纤维化(CF)患者的纵向人口统计学和临床数据。我们的目的是验证数据收集并确定CCFR的潜在局限性。方法:在加拿大邀请的40家经认证的CF诊所中,根据先验样本量计算,包括8家诊所。每个CF诊所2019年的人口随机抽取15%。数据变量的选择基于其对护理的重要性、流行病学趋势以及与人口统计学、诊所访问量和住院率相关的数据。将登记数据的准确性与作为金标准的医疗记录进行比较。每个数据元素被分类为正确、不正确或无法验证。准确率计算为验证的所有记录中正确率的百分比。结果:2019年共有4382人的数据输入了CCFR。验证队列包括来自8家诊所的208人,这些诊所在地理位置、诊所规模(小/中/大)和诊所类型(成人、儿科和联合)方面具有代表性。208只,男性52%,白人95%,平均年龄26.3岁(IQR: 15.2 ~ 36.6)。与医疗记录相比,大约95%关于临床测量、感染、治疗和住院的CCFR数据是准确的。在人口学方面,性别和出生日期的准确率为100%。结论:我们对CCFR的验证表明临床研究中使用的临床和人口学变量具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信