Mpox stigma in the UK and implications for future outbreak control: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Amy Paterson, Ashleigh Cheyne, Harun Tulunay, Chloe Orkin, Will Nutland, Jake Dunning, Jeni Stolow, Nina Gobat, Piero Olliaro, Amanda Rojek
{"title":"Mpox stigma in the UK and implications for future outbreak control: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.","authors":"Amy Paterson, Ashleigh Cheyne, Harun Tulunay, Chloe Orkin, Will Nutland, Jake Dunning, Jeni Stolow, Nina Gobat, Piero Olliaro, Amanda Rojek","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04243-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stigma emerged as a prominent public health challenge in the global mpox outbreak that began in 2022, impeding outbreak control efforts and the well-being of affected individuals. Addressing stigma is important for improving infection prevention and control. Despite frequent mention in public and policy discourse, robust assessment of mpox stigma is lacking. This study investigated the causes, manifestations, and impacts of mpox-related stigma in the UK, focusing on anticipated stigma among directly and indirectly affected communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online, mixed-methods cross-sectional survey to assess mpox stigma. We developed and content validated a new tool, the Stigma Survey and Community-based Assessment for New and Re-emerging outbreaks (Stigma-SCANR) for this purpose. Through quota sampling, the survey targeted populations most affected by mpox at the time of data collection (March-July 2024), including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and healthcare workers. The survey primarily explored anticipated stigma. Respondents with previous mpox diagnoses were asked about personal experiences of stigma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 479 respondents who initiated the survey, 437 (91%) were included in analyses. In modules related to drivers of stigma, pre-existing prejudices towards associated groups such as GBMSM and migrants were emphasised, alongside fear and misinformation. On average, respondents anticipated higher levels of negative judgement and unwarranted avoidance compared to other forms of social stigma, particularly from casual partners and the public. Among the 13 respondents who reported a previous mpox diagnosis, 11 (85%) had experienced mpox-related stigma. Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) said they would not, or were unlikely to, tell a recent sexual partner about an mpox diagnosis. Feelings of shame were considered the most common barrier to care-seeking (299 respondents, 68%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis of mpox stigma in the UK offers insights for international outbreak response, particularly in countries with similarly affected communities. Lessons learnt may also be transferable to other disease outbreaks. We propose practical recommendations for reducing stigma in future outbreaks, including peer support initiatives, distributing accessible information about safe timelines for returning to socialising and work or school, and co-designing public communications and contact tracing programmes with affected community members.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"422"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04243-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stigma emerged as a prominent public health challenge in the global mpox outbreak that began in 2022, impeding outbreak control efforts and the well-being of affected individuals. Addressing stigma is important for improving infection prevention and control. Despite frequent mention in public and policy discourse, robust assessment of mpox stigma is lacking. This study investigated the causes, manifestations, and impacts of mpox-related stigma in the UK, focusing on anticipated stigma among directly and indirectly affected communities.

Methods: We conducted an online, mixed-methods cross-sectional survey to assess mpox stigma. We developed and content validated a new tool, the Stigma Survey and Community-based Assessment for New and Re-emerging outbreaks (Stigma-SCANR) for this purpose. Through quota sampling, the survey targeted populations most affected by mpox at the time of data collection (March-July 2024), including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and healthcare workers. The survey primarily explored anticipated stigma. Respondents with previous mpox diagnoses were asked about personal experiences of stigma.

Results: Of 479 respondents who initiated the survey, 437 (91%) were included in analyses. In modules related to drivers of stigma, pre-existing prejudices towards associated groups such as GBMSM and migrants were emphasised, alongside fear and misinformation. On average, respondents anticipated higher levels of negative judgement and unwarranted avoidance compared to other forms of social stigma, particularly from casual partners and the public. Among the 13 respondents who reported a previous mpox diagnosis, 11 (85%) had experienced mpox-related stigma. Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) said they would not, or were unlikely to, tell a recent sexual partner about an mpox diagnosis. Feelings of shame were considered the most common barrier to care-seeking (299 respondents, 68%).

Conclusions: This analysis of mpox stigma in the UK offers insights for international outbreak response, particularly in countries with similarly affected communities. Lessons learnt may also be transferable to other disease outbreaks. We propose practical recommendations for reducing stigma in future outbreaks, including peer support initiatives, distributing accessible information about safe timelines for returning to socialising and work or school, and co-designing public communications and contact tracing programmes with affected community members.

英国m痘病耻感及其对未来疫情控制的影响:一项横断面混合方法研究。
背景:在2022年开始的全球麻疹疫情中,污名成为一项突出的公共卫生挑战,阻碍了疫情控制工作和受影响个体的福祉。解决耻辱感问题对于改善感染预防和控制非常重要。尽管在公共和政策讨论中经常提及,但缺乏对麻疹病耻感的有力评估。本研究调查了英国与麻疹相关的耻辱感的原因、表现和影响,重点关注直接和间接受影响社区的预期耻辱感。方法:我们进行了一项在线、混合方法的横断面调查,以评估m痘病耻感。为此,我们开发并验证了一个新工具,即新发和再发疾病的病耻感调查和社区评估(Stigma- scanr)。通过配额抽样,调查的目标是在收集数据时(2024年3月至7月)受麻疹影响最严重的人群,包括同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)以及卫生保健工作者。该调查主要探讨预期的病耻感。曾被诊断出m痘的应答者被问及个人的污名经历。结果:在发起调查的479名应答者中,有437人(91%)被纳入分析。在与污名驱动因素相关的模块中,除了恐惧和错误信息外,还强调了对同性恋和移徙者等相关群体已有的偏见。平均而言,与其他形式的社会耻辱相比,特别是来自普通伴侣和公众的负面评价和无理回避的程度更高。在13名报告曾有过m痘诊断的答复者中,11名(85%)经历过与m痘相关的耻辱感。近四分之一的受访者(24%)表示,他们不会或不太可能告诉最近的性伴侣自己被诊断出痘。羞耻感被认为是寻求护理的最常见障碍(299名受访者,68%)。结论:对英国m痘病耻感的分析为国际疫情应对提供了见解,特别是在具有类似受影响社区的国家。吸取的经验教训也可用于其他疾病暴发。我们提出了切实可行的建议,以减少在未来疫情中出现的耻辱感,包括同伴支持倡议,分发关于重返社交和工作或学校安全时间表的无障碍信息,以及与受影响社区成员共同设计公共沟通和接触者追踪规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信