Anaesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Turkish version in paediatric surgery team.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nazmiye Celik, Senay Sarmasoglu Kilikcier, Gulsen Tasdelen Teker, Gulsen Keskin, Mine Akın, Sengul Ozmert, Melih Elcin, Emrah Senel
{"title":"Anaesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Turkish version in paediatric surgery team.","authors":"Nazmiye Celik, Senay Sarmasoglu Kilikcier, Gulsen Tasdelen Teker, Gulsen Keskin, Mine Akın, Sengul Ozmert, Melih Elcin, Emrah Senel","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Anaesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form (ANTSdk) is a widely accepted, practical, and comprehensive measurement tool used by anaesthesiologists and other healthcare professionals. This study aims to adapt the ANTSdk into Turkish as a valid and reliable assessment instrument. By doing so, it will contribute to establishing a common language and standardised terminology for integrating non-technical skills into the Turkish healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a standardised cross-cultural adaptation process. The psychometric properties of the Turkish-adapted version of the ANTSdk were evaluated through observations of 81 real paediatric surgical operating room teams, assessed simultaneously by two independent observers. Validity was examined using content validity analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the Turkish version of ANTSdk (ANTStr) were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The specified factorial model retained the same grouping of elements into four domains as in the original version of ANTSdk. All standardised factor loadings were greater than 0.3. The inter-rater reliability, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient of the global score, was 0.98. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scores provided by the first rater ranged from 0.83 to 0.94, while for the second rater, it ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. The generalisability coefficient calculated for ANTStr was exceptionally high at 0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of ANTSdk demonstrates strong psychometric properties for evaluating paediatric surgical team performance in the operating room. This translated instrument can be used to assess non-technical skills in paediatric surgical teams within real clinical settings, facilitating benchmarking and international collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Anaesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills in Denmark Form (ANTSdk) is a widely accepted, practical, and comprehensive measurement tool used by anaesthesiologists and other healthcare professionals. This study aims to adapt the ANTSdk into Turkish as a valid and reliable assessment instrument. By doing so, it will contribute to establishing a common language and standardised terminology for integrating non-technical skills into the Turkish healthcare system.

Methods: We conducted a standardised cross-cultural adaptation process. The psychometric properties of the Turkish-adapted version of the ANTSdk were evaluated through observations of 81 real paediatric surgical operating room teams, assessed simultaneously by two independent observers. Validity was examined using content validity analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the Turkish version of ANTSdk (ANTStr) were also assessed.

Results: The specified factorial model retained the same grouping of elements into four domains as in the original version of ANTSdk. All standardised factor loadings were greater than 0.3. The inter-rater reliability, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient of the global score, was 0.98. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scores provided by the first rater ranged from 0.83 to 0.94, while for the second rater, it ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. The generalisability coefficient calculated for ANTStr was exceptionally high at 0.96.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of ANTSdk demonstrates strong psychometric properties for evaluating paediatric surgical team performance in the operating room. This translated instrument can be used to assess non-technical skills in paediatric surgical teams within real clinical settings, facilitating benchmarking and international collaboration.

丹麦麻醉医师的非技术技能形式:跨文化适应,土耳其语版本在儿科外科团队中的可靠性和有效性。
背景:丹麦麻醉师非技术技能表(ANTSdk)是一种被麻醉师和其他医疗保健专业人员广泛接受、实用和全面的测量工具。本研究旨在将ANTSdk作为有效和可靠的评估工具适应土耳其语。通过这样做,它将有助于建立一种通用语言和标准化术语,将非技术技能纳入土耳其医疗保健系统。方法:我们进行了标准化的跨文化适应过程。土耳其版ANTSdk的心理测量特性是通过对81个真实儿科外科手术室团队的观察来评估的,同时由两名独立观察员进行评估。采用内容效度分析和验证性因子分析检验效度。对土耳其版ANTSdk (ANTStr)的内部一致性和评分者间可靠性也进行了评估。结果:指定的因子模型保留了与ANTSdk原始版本相同的四个域的元素分组。所有标准化因子负荷均大于0.3。用总体得分的类内相关系数测量的评分者间信度为0.98。第一评分者提供的评分的Cronbach’s alpha系数在0.83 ~ 0.94之间,第二评分者提供的评分的Cronbach’s alpha系数在0.84 ~ 0.94之间。计算出的ANTStr通用性系数异常高,为0.96。结论:土耳其版ANTSdk具有较强的心理测量特性,可用于评估儿科外科团队在手术室中的表现。该翻译工具可用于评估儿科外科团队在实际临床环境中的非技术技能,促进基准制定和国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信