Comparison of catheter wound infusion, intrathecal morphine, and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain management in open liver resection: randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf074
Damien Rousseleau, Barthélémy Plane, Julien Labreuche, Adeline Pierache, Younes El Amine, Sabine Ethgen, Jean-Michel Wattier, Cédric Cirenei, Emmanuel Boleslawski, Gilles Lebuffe
{"title":"Comparison of catheter wound infusion, intrathecal morphine, and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain management in open liver resection: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Damien Rousseleau, Barthélémy Plane, Julien Labreuche, Adeline Pierache, Younes El Amine, Sabine Ethgen, Jean-Michel Wattier, Cédric Cirenei, Emmanuel Boleslawski, Gilles Lebuffe","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain relief is an important aspect of recovery after open liver resection. This randomized open-label single-centre trial assessed the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) analgesia alone or in combination with catheter wound infusion (CWI) or intrathecal morphine (ITM) after open liver resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing open liver resection were randomly assigned to receive either i.v. analgesia alone or in combination with ITM or CWI. In this study, i.v. analgesia consisted of systematic i.v. paracetamol and i.v. morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, with i.v. nefopam as rescue analgesia for a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score > 4. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine dose at 24 hours (h). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, cumulative opioid use at 48 and 72 h, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 186 patients were included in the study (62 patients in each group). The median 24-h morphine dose was 14 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 6-25) mg in the i.v. analgesia group, 14 (i.q.r. 7-23) mg in the CWI group, and 7 (i.q.r. 3-15) mg in the ITM group. ITM significantly reduced morphine use compared with i.v. analgesia alone (mean difference on log-transformed values 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.93; Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.002) and lowered pain scores during the first 12 h. No significant differences were observed between the CWI and i.v. analgesia groups. By 72 h, cumulative opioid use was similar across all groups. Adverse events and postoperative complications were comparable across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ITM reduced the cumulative morphine dose and pain intensity in the first 24 h after liver resection, providing a valuable option for postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT03238430 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain relief is an important aspect of recovery after open liver resection. This randomized open-label single-centre trial assessed the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) analgesia alone or in combination with catheter wound infusion (CWI) or intrathecal morphine (ITM) after open liver resection.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing open liver resection were randomly assigned to receive either i.v. analgesia alone or in combination with ITM or CWI. In this study, i.v. analgesia consisted of systematic i.v. paracetamol and i.v. morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, with i.v. nefopam as rescue analgesia for a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score > 4. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine dose at 24 hours (h). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, cumulative opioid use at 48 and 72 h, and postoperative complications.

Results: In all, 186 patients were included in the study (62 patients in each group). The median 24-h morphine dose was 14 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 6-25) mg in the i.v. analgesia group, 14 (i.q.r. 7-23) mg in the CWI group, and 7 (i.q.r. 3-15) mg in the ITM group. ITM significantly reduced morphine use compared with i.v. analgesia alone (mean difference on log-transformed values 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.93; Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.002) and lowered pain scores during the first 12 h. No significant differences were observed between the CWI and i.v. analgesia groups. By 72 h, cumulative opioid use was similar across all groups. Adverse events and postoperative complications were comparable across the three groups.

Conclusion: ITM reduced the cumulative morphine dose and pain intensity in the first 24 h after liver resection, providing a valuable option for postoperative analgesia.

Registration number: NCT03238430 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

开放性肝切除术术后疼痛管理中切口导管输注、鞘内吗啡和静脉镇痛的比较:随机临床试验。
背景:缓解疼痛是开放肝切除术后恢复的一个重要方面。这项随机、开放标签的单中心试验评估了开放肝切除术后单独静脉(i.v.)镇痛或联合伤口导管输注(CWI)或鞘内吗啡(ITM)的疗效。方法:将行开放肝切除术的成年患者随机分为单独静脉注射镇痛组和联合ITM或CWI组。在本研究中,静脉注射镇痛包括系统静脉注射扑热息痛和静脉注射吗啡,通过患者控制的镇痛泵,静脉注射尼泊泮作为救援镇痛,数值评定量表(NRS)评分为bbb40。主要终点为24小时吗啡累积剂量(h)。次要结局包括疼痛强度、48和72小时阿片类药物的累积使用以及术后并发症。结果:共纳入186例患者(每组62例)。静脉注射镇痛组吗啡24小时的中位剂量为14(四分位数间距6 ~ 25)mg, CWI组为14(四分位数间距7 ~ 23)mg, ITM组为7(四分位数间距3 ~ 15)mg。与单纯静脉注射镇痛相比,ITM显著减少了吗啡的使用(对数转换值的平均差异为0.57;95%置信区间0.21 ~ 0.93;bonferroni校正P = 0.002),疼痛评分在前12小时内降低。CWI组与静脉注射镇痛组间无显著差异。到72小时,所有组的阿片类药物累积使用情况相似。三组的不良事件和术后并发症具有可比性。结论:ITM降低了肝切除术后24 h吗啡的累积剂量和疼痛强度,为术后镇痛提供了一种有价值的选择。注册号:NCT03238430 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信