Cyclical medication management interventions in health care settings: A systematic review

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Crisostomo Mercado, Rachel Urwin, Karla Seaman, Anna Kelly, Osman Qadri, Johanna Westbrook I.
{"title":"Cyclical medication management interventions in health care settings: A systematic review","authors":"Isabelle Meulenbroeks,&nbsp;Crisostomo Mercado,&nbsp;Rachel Urwin,&nbsp;Karla Seaman,&nbsp;Anna Kelly,&nbsp;Osman Qadri,&nbsp;Johanna Westbrook I.","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>It is estimated that one in 30 patients experiences at least one preventable medication-related harm while receiving care. Cyclical medicine improvement interventions, where health systems continuously collect data, implement prescribing/dispensing interventions, review outcomes, and revise the intervention, have demonstrated health outcome improvements in a range of health care settings. This systematic review aimed to synthesize information on the characteristics and outcomes of cyclical medication management interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Five databases were systematically searched for cyclical medication management interventions from 2000 to 2023. Studies were screened in a two-step process: title/abstract and full-text screening. All intervention, population, and outcome data were extracted. Intervention data were thematically categorized, and outcome data were categorized using Proctor's framework. The quality of data was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-five cyclical interventions from 46 publications were included. Most interventions studied cyclical medication management interventions in hospital settings (80%, <i>n</i> = 37) and utilized the plan-do-study-act framework to guide intervention design (64%, <i>n</i> = 29). Cyclical medication management interventions comprised multiple components (mean 2.4 components), with common components including practice standardization (<i>n</i> = 23), clinician feedback (<i>n</i> = 20), and clinician education (<i>n</i> = 18). One hundred and twenty-two outcome measures were extracted and categorized as implementation (<i>n</i> = 77), service (<i>n</i> = 41), and patient outcomes (<i>n</i> = 4). The quality of many publications was poor; 8 publications could not be scored or scored 0 on the MMAT, and the remaining publications scored on average (mean) 60% on the MMAT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Cyclical medication management interventions show weak evidence that they can be implemented successfully and improve health system and service outcomes. Significant further research and health system structuring are required to address the quality issues surrounding cyclical medication management implementation and reporting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is estimated that one in 30 patients experiences at least one preventable medication-related harm while receiving care. Cyclical medicine improvement interventions, where health systems continuously collect data, implement prescribing/dispensing interventions, review outcomes, and revise the intervention, have demonstrated health outcome improvements in a range of health care settings. This systematic review aimed to synthesize information on the characteristics and outcomes of cyclical medication management interventions.

Methods

Five databases were systematically searched for cyclical medication management interventions from 2000 to 2023. Studies were screened in a two-step process: title/abstract and full-text screening. All intervention, population, and outcome data were extracted. Intervention data were thematically categorized, and outcome data were categorized using Proctor's framework. The quality of data was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

Results

Forty-five cyclical interventions from 46 publications were included. Most interventions studied cyclical medication management interventions in hospital settings (80%, n = 37) and utilized the plan-do-study-act framework to guide intervention design (64%, n = 29). Cyclical medication management interventions comprised multiple components (mean 2.4 components), with common components including practice standardization (n = 23), clinician feedback (n = 20), and clinician education (n = 18). One hundred and twenty-two outcome measures were extracted and categorized as implementation (n = 77), service (n = 41), and patient outcomes (n = 4). The quality of many publications was poor; 8 publications could not be scored or scored 0 on the MMAT, and the remaining publications scored on average (mean) 60% on the MMAT.

Conclusion

Cyclical medication management interventions show weak evidence that they can be implemented successfully and improve health system and service outcomes. Significant further research and health system structuring are required to address the quality issues surrounding cyclical medication management implementation and reporting.

Abstract Image

卫生保健环境中的周期性药物管理干预:系统综述
据估计,每30名患者中就有1人在接受治疗时至少遭受一种可预防的药物相关伤害。周期性药物改善干预措施,即卫生系统不断收集数据,实施处方/配药干预措施,审查结果并修订干预措施,已在一系列卫生保健环境中证明了健康结果的改善。本系统综述旨在综合有关周期性药物管理干预的特点和结果的信息。方法系统检索2000 - 2023年5个数据库的周期性用药管理干预措施。研究的筛选分为两步:标题/摘要筛选和全文筛选。提取所有干预、人口和结局数据。干预数据按主题分类,结果数据使用Proctor框架分类。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估数据质量。结果纳入46篇文献的45项周期性干预措施。大多数干预研究了医院环境中的周期性药物管理干预(80%,n = 37),并利用计划-做-研究-行动框架来指导干预设计(64%,n = 29)。周期性药物管理干预包括多个组成部分(平均2.4个组成部分),常见组成部分包括实践标准化(n = 23)、临床医生反馈(n = 20)和临床医生教育(n = 18)。提取了122个结果测量指标,并将其分类为实施(n = 77)、服务(n = 41)和患者结果(n = 4)。许多出版物的质量很差;8篇论文MMAT无法得分或得分为0分,其余论文MMAT平均得分为60%。结论循环用药管理干预措施实施成功,改善卫生系统和服务效果的证据不足。需要进一步的研究和卫生系统结构来解决围绕周期性药物管理实施和报告的质量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信