{"title":"Out of sight, out of mind? Working with separation and risk when patients are away from the hospital","authors":"Sarah Miell, Simmi Protab","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Risk management in all institutions can become unthinking and process-led, and in this paper we, as psychosocial nurses, have sought to convey how we think about risk at weekends for our patients at the Cassel Hospital. In contrast to many mental health inpatient settings, inpatients at the Cassel go home for the weekend. On one hand, this supports the development of their responsibility for themselves and their social relationships, and on the other, it raises difficulties around separation. These two aspects present us with questions around how to manage risk when patients are not in the hospital. We took as our starting point formal discussions with our inpatient group and nurse team, and linked the ideas that emerged from those discussions with ideas from former members of Cassel staff, drawing on psychoanalytic and psychosocial theories. A dominant theme that emerged was the existence of two selves in the patients' minds – their home self and their Cassel self, and the anxiety shared by patients and nurses about how these two selves can become integrated. Such learning can inform practitioners and policy makers interested in creating services that use relational practice as well as trauma-informed care. These principles could be considered applicable also to health, social care and criminal justice systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"41 3","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Risk management in all institutions can become unthinking and process-led, and in this paper we, as psychosocial nurses, have sought to convey how we think about risk at weekends for our patients at the Cassel Hospital. In contrast to many mental health inpatient settings, inpatients at the Cassel go home for the weekend. On one hand, this supports the development of their responsibility for themselves and their social relationships, and on the other, it raises difficulties around separation. These two aspects present us with questions around how to manage risk when patients are not in the hospital. We took as our starting point formal discussions with our inpatient group and nurse team, and linked the ideas that emerged from those discussions with ideas from former members of Cassel staff, drawing on psychoanalytic and psychosocial theories. A dominant theme that emerged was the existence of two selves in the patients' minds – their home self and their Cassel self, and the anxiety shared by patients and nurses about how these two selves can become integrated. Such learning can inform practitioners and policy makers interested in creating services that use relational practice as well as trauma-informed care. These principles could be considered applicable also to health, social care and criminal justice systems.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.