Factors influencing retention of patient-facing genetic counselors: Role of generational age and work environment

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jade R. Frye, Leah Wetherill, Stephanie A. Cohen, Sara M. Fitzgerald-Butt, Benjamin M. Helm, Sandra K. Prucka, Courtney D. Schroeder
{"title":"Factors influencing retention of patient-facing genetic counselors: Role of generational age and work environment","authors":"Jade R. Frye,&nbsp;Leah Wetherill,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Cohen,&nbsp;Sara M. Fitzgerald-Butt,&nbsp;Benjamin M. Helm,&nbsp;Sandra K. Prucka,&nbsp;Courtney D. Schroeder","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Retention is a challenge that every health organization faces in an evolving and competitive market, including those in hospital settings. Some healthcare professions have identified factors that influence their employees to either stay or leave, which has led to the development and implementation of targeted strategies to increase job satisfaction and retention. Prior to this study, only factors associated with leaving have been identified in the genetic counseling profession. Despite the growing number of genetic counselors in the field, a shortage of patient-facing genetic counselors is expected by 2030. Therefore, this study explored three topics among patient-facing genetic counselors: (1) intent to stay in their current position, (2) top factors that influence this decision, (3) whether these factors differ by generational age, and (4) whether these factors differ by work setting. Genetic counselors who were in a patient-facing position for ≥6 months, board-certified, and working in the United States or Canada were eligible for study participation. Of the 520 respondents, the majority (84.6%) intend to stay in their current position. The top factors selected for staying were <i>flexibility</i> (58.9%), <i>colleagues</i> (56.4%), <i>salary</i> (52.0%), <i>autonomy</i> (48.1%), <i>location</i> (47.5%), and <i>specialty</i> (44.0%). Generation X was more likely to choose <i>autonomy</i> and less likely to choose <i>location</i> in their top five factors for staying compared to other generations. Individuals working in industry were more likely to choose <i>flexibility</i> and <i>autonomy</i>; those in academic centers were more likely to choose <i>colleagues</i>; those in non-hospital clinics were more likely to choose <i>salary</i>; and those in non-academic health centers were more likely to choose <i>location</i> compared to other work settings. Based on our results, clinical leadership should allocate resources to strategies that increase flexibility, foster a collaborative environment, and promote autonomy within the workplace to increase retention and prevent the predicted shortage of patient-facing genetic counselors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retention is a challenge that every health organization faces in an evolving and competitive market, including those in hospital settings. Some healthcare professions have identified factors that influence their employees to either stay or leave, which has led to the development and implementation of targeted strategies to increase job satisfaction and retention. Prior to this study, only factors associated with leaving have been identified in the genetic counseling profession. Despite the growing number of genetic counselors in the field, a shortage of patient-facing genetic counselors is expected by 2030. Therefore, this study explored three topics among patient-facing genetic counselors: (1) intent to stay in their current position, (2) top factors that influence this decision, (3) whether these factors differ by generational age, and (4) whether these factors differ by work setting. Genetic counselors who were in a patient-facing position for ≥6 months, board-certified, and working in the United States or Canada were eligible for study participation. Of the 520 respondents, the majority (84.6%) intend to stay in their current position. The top factors selected for staying were flexibility (58.9%), colleagues (56.4%), salary (52.0%), autonomy (48.1%), location (47.5%), and specialty (44.0%). Generation X was more likely to choose autonomy and less likely to choose location in their top five factors for staying compared to other generations. Individuals working in industry were more likely to choose flexibility and autonomy; those in academic centers were more likely to choose colleagues; those in non-hospital clinics were more likely to choose salary; and those in non-academic health centers were more likely to choose location compared to other work settings. Based on our results, clinical leadership should allocate resources to strategies that increase flexibility, foster a collaborative environment, and promote autonomy within the workplace to increase retention and prevent the predicted shortage of patient-facing genetic counselors.

Abstract Image

遗传咨询师保留的影响因素:代际年龄和工作环境的作用
在不断发展和竞争激烈的市场中,包括在医院环境中,保留人员是每个卫生组织面临的挑战。一些医疗保健专业已经确定了影响其员工留下或离开的因素,这导致制定和实施有针对性的战略,以提高工作满意度和保留率。在这项研究之前,只有与离开相关的因素在遗传咨询专业中被确定。尽管该领域的遗传咨询师越来越多,但预计到2030年,面向患者的遗传咨询师将出现短缺。因此,本研究探讨了面对患者的遗传咨询师的三个主题:(1)留在当前职位的意图;(2)影响这一决定的主要因素;(3)这些因素是否因代际年龄而异;(4)这些因素是否因工作环境而异。在美国或加拿大工作且在患者面前工作6个月以上的遗传咨询师有资格参加研究。在520名受访者中,大多数人(84.6%)打算保持目前的职位。选择留下来的首要因素是灵活性(58.9%)、同事(56.4%)、薪酬(52.0%)、自主性(48.1%)、地点(47.5%)和专业(44.0%)。与其他几代人相比,X一代更有可能选择自主性,而不太可能选择地理位置。在工业界工作的个人更有可能选择灵活性和自主性;那些在学术中心的人更有可能选择同事;那些在非医院诊所的人更有可能选择薪水;与其他工作环境相比,那些在非学术性医疗中心工作的人更有可能选择地点。根据我们的研究结果,临床领导应该将资源分配到增加灵活性的策略上,培养协作环境,促进工作场所的自主权,以增加保留率,防止预测的面向患者的遗传咨询师短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信