Jamiel Williams, Jared Cammon, David Horton Jr., Jerrod A. Henderson
{"title":"Engineering while Black: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of Black males' construction and negotiation of engineering identity","authors":"Jamiel Williams, Jared Cammon, David Horton Jr., Jerrod A. Henderson","doi":"10.1002/jee.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite ongoing efforts to broaden the participation of Black males in engineering, historical data point to a stagnation in their engineering bachelor's degree attainment. Furthermore, the relative dearth of literature that centers the voices of Black male engineering students has limited the propagation of positive change in producing more Black engineers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Given links between engineering identity and educational outcomes, such as persistence in engineering, we engaged engineering role identity to sensitize ourselves to themes that might emerge during the study of how Black male undergraduate engineering students constructed and negotiated their identities as engineers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\n \n <p>Guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), we conducted semi-structured interviews with seven Black male engineering undergraduates to explore the following question: How do Black males construct and negotiate their engineering identities?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We inductively developed three themes, namely “Identity as Others,” “Identity as Validators,” and “Identity as Representatives for All.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight the psychological costs that these Black males experienced and how their racial and engineering identities were inseparable—what we describe as “Engineering While Black.” At the same time, navigating engineering classrooms and workspaces demanded ongoing negotiation that cultivated a sense of agency and empowered participants to define and assert their identities on their own terms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite ongoing efforts to broaden the participation of Black males in engineering, historical data point to a stagnation in their engineering bachelor's degree attainment. Furthermore, the relative dearth of literature that centers the voices of Black male engineering students has limited the propagation of positive change in producing more Black engineers.
Purpose
Given links between engineering identity and educational outcomes, such as persistence in engineering, we engaged engineering role identity to sensitize ourselves to themes that might emerge during the study of how Black male undergraduate engineering students constructed and negotiated their identities as engineers.
Design/Method
Guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), we conducted semi-structured interviews with seven Black male engineering undergraduates to explore the following question: How do Black males construct and negotiate their engineering identities?
Results
We inductively developed three themes, namely “Identity as Others,” “Identity as Validators,” and “Identity as Representatives for All.”
Conclusions
Findings highlight the psychological costs that these Black males experienced and how their racial and engineering identities were inseparable—what we describe as “Engineering While Black.” At the same time, navigating engineering classrooms and workspaces demanded ongoing negotiation that cultivated a sense of agency and empowered participants to define and assert their identities on their own terms.