Defensive care

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Ricardo Readi
{"title":"Defensive care","authors":"Ricardo Readi","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This work consists of an approach to the concept of Social Defences, which consolidates one way of applying psychoanalytic thinking to human institutionality. The author briefly describes the path psychoanalytic theory takes towards the outline of this concept, to emphasise later the implications it has for health institutions. There is a statement about the importance of considering the ways in which individual defences tend to collude with the institutionalized group's unconscious mechanisms, where certain conditions will be determined for the containment of primitive states of mind. Emphasis is made about the possibility that these dynamics have concrete effects on the workers' capacities and health, on the patients' treatment, and mainly on the loss of meaning that these people experience in their link with this institution. Two vignettes are included to attempt an illustration of these dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"41 3","pages":"384-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work consists of an approach to the concept of Social Defences, which consolidates one way of applying psychoanalytic thinking to human institutionality. The author briefly describes the path psychoanalytic theory takes towards the outline of this concept, to emphasise later the implications it has for health institutions. There is a statement about the importance of considering the ways in which individual defences tend to collude with the institutionalized group's unconscious mechanisms, where certain conditions will be determined for the containment of primitive states of mind. Emphasis is made about the possibility that these dynamics have concrete effects on the workers' capacities and health, on the patients' treatment, and mainly on the loss of meaning that these people experience in their link with this institution. Two vignettes are included to attempt an illustration of these dynamics.

防御性医疗
这项工作包括对社会防御概念的一种方法,它巩固了将精神分析思维应用于人类制度的一种方法。作者简要地描述了精神分析理论走向这一概念轮廓的路径,以强调它对卫生机构的影响。有一种说法是关于考虑个人防御倾向于与制度化群体的无意识机制相勾结的方式的重要性,在这种情况下,将确定某些条件来遏制原始的心理状态。报告强调,这些动态可能对工人的能力和健康、对病人的治疗产生具体影响,主要是对这些人在与该机构的联系中失去意义产生具体影响。包括两个小插曲,试图说明这些动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信